卫生系统如何从紧急情况中汲取经验教训?来自哥伦比亚的证据。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0322486
Simon Turner, Mary Ruth Guevara Maldonado
{"title":"卫生系统如何从紧急情况中汲取经验教训?来自哥伦比亚的证据。","authors":"Simon Turner, Mary Ruth Guevara Maldonado","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0322486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic demanded rapid adaptation to health systems internationally, but little is known about the sustained value of the approaches to learning adopted. How does ongoing environmental turbulence influence the lessons drawn from health system responses to pandemics? To address this question, we engage with, and further develop, Levitt and March's highly cited perspective on experiential learning by analyzing Colombian healthcare professionals' experiences gathered during semi-structured interviews. Interviews included representatives of national government, service providers, administrative staff, clinicians, including physicians and nurses, professional associations, and academics. Aspects from the macro, meso, and micro contexts associated with the sustainability of organizational learning were identified. At the macro level, reform efforts seem to overlook lessons learned from the pandemic and divert the attention of key actors. At the meso level, leadership uses success stories to motivate teams, but financial challenges and absence of formal evaluations hinder the sustainability of innovations. At the micro level, there is a diminished workforce capacity, some concerns about virtual professional training and difficulties to address mental health issues is difficult due to stoic professional identities, unrelenting tempo of medical work, and institutional encouragement. This study extends Levitt and March's organizational learning framework to include environmental turbulence as a factor influencing learning. It highlights that a turbulent context simultaneously triggers learning processes while being a precursor to the interpretation of experiences. The research concludes there are additional moderating variables for organizational learning like human resource capacities, political cycles, and infrastructure continuity, which relate to professional pressures to \"turn the page\" on the pandemic, the patchy resourcing of new initiatives at the organizational level, and the distraction of health reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0322486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Turner, Mary Ruth Guevara Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0322486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Covid-19 pandemic demanded rapid adaptation to health systems internationally, but little is known about the sustained value of the approaches to learning adopted. How does ongoing environmental turbulence influence the lessons drawn from health system responses to pandemics? To address this question, we engage with, and further develop, Levitt and March's highly cited perspective on experiential learning by analyzing Colombian healthcare professionals' experiences gathered during semi-structured interviews. Interviews included representatives of national government, service providers, administrative staff, clinicians, including physicians and nurses, professional associations, and academics. Aspects from the macro, meso, and micro contexts associated with the sustainability of organizational learning were identified. At the macro level, reform efforts seem to overlook lessons learned from the pandemic and divert the attention of key actors. At the meso level, leadership uses success stories to motivate teams, but financial challenges and absence of formal evaluations hinder the sustainability of innovations. At the micro level, there is a diminished workforce capacity, some concerns about virtual professional training and difficulties to address mental health issues is difficult due to stoic professional identities, unrelenting tempo of medical work, and institutional encouragement. This study extends Levitt and March's organizational learning framework to include environmental turbulence as a factor influencing learning. It highlights that a turbulent context simultaneously triggers learning processes while being a precursor to the interpretation of experiences. The research concludes there are additional moderating variables for organizational learning like human resource capacities, political cycles, and infrastructure continuity, which relate to professional pressures to \\\"turn the page\\\" on the pandemic, the patchy resourcing of new initiatives at the organizational level, and the distraction of health reform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0322486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322486\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行要求迅速适应国际卫生系统,但人们对所采用的学习方法的持续价值知之甚少。持续的环境动荡如何影响卫生系统应对大流行病的经验教训?为了解决这个问题,我们通过分析哥伦比亚医疗保健专业人员在半结构化访谈中收集的经验,参与并进一步发展了Levitt和March关于体验式学习的高度引用的观点。访谈对象包括国家政府、服务提供者、行政人员、临床医生(包括医生和护士)、专业协会和学者的代表。从宏观、中观和微观三个方面确定了与组织学习可持续性相关的因素。在宏观层面,改革努力似乎忽视了从大流行病中吸取的教训,转移了关键行为体的注意力。在中体层,领导使用成功故事来激励团队,但财务挑战和缺乏正式评估阻碍了创新的可持续性。在微观层面上,劳动力能力下降,对虚拟专业培训的一些担忧,以及由于坚忍的专业身份、医疗工作的无情节奏和体制鼓励,难以解决心理健康问题。本研究扩展了Levitt和March的组织学习框架,将环境动荡作为影响学习的因素纳入其中。它强调,动荡的环境同时触发学习过程,同时也是解释经验的先驱。该研究得出结论,组织学习还存在其他调节变量,如人力资源能力、政治周期和基础设施连续性,这些变量与“翻过”大流行的专业压力、组织层面新举措的资源不完整以及卫生改革的分散有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.

How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.

How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.

How can health systems sustain lessons drawn from emergency contexts? Evidence from Colombia.

The Covid-19 pandemic demanded rapid adaptation to health systems internationally, but little is known about the sustained value of the approaches to learning adopted. How does ongoing environmental turbulence influence the lessons drawn from health system responses to pandemics? To address this question, we engage with, and further develop, Levitt and March's highly cited perspective on experiential learning by analyzing Colombian healthcare professionals' experiences gathered during semi-structured interviews. Interviews included representatives of national government, service providers, administrative staff, clinicians, including physicians and nurses, professional associations, and academics. Aspects from the macro, meso, and micro contexts associated with the sustainability of organizational learning were identified. At the macro level, reform efforts seem to overlook lessons learned from the pandemic and divert the attention of key actors. At the meso level, leadership uses success stories to motivate teams, but financial challenges and absence of formal evaluations hinder the sustainability of innovations. At the micro level, there is a diminished workforce capacity, some concerns about virtual professional training and difficulties to address mental health issues is difficult due to stoic professional identities, unrelenting tempo of medical work, and institutional encouragement. This study extends Levitt and March's organizational learning framework to include environmental turbulence as a factor influencing learning. It highlights that a turbulent context simultaneously triggers learning processes while being a precursor to the interpretation of experiences. The research concludes there are additional moderating variables for organizational learning like human resource capacities, political cycles, and infrastructure continuity, which relate to professional pressures to "turn the page" on the pandemic, the patchy resourcing of new initiatives at the organizational level, and the distraction of health reform.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信