{"title":"崛起,根丝胞菌:在角孢菌科(木链菌,Cantharellales)中,移动到一个真菌,一个名称。","authors":"R P O'Donnell, C C Linde, T W May","doi":"10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> is a family of cryptic basidiomycetous fungi, most notable for the plant pathogens known under generic names such as <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, <i>Thanatephorus</i>, <i>Ceratorhiza</i>, and <i>Ceratobasidium</i>. While responsible for billions of dollars in crop losses annually, members of these genera also serve important ecological functions as orchid mycorrhizal symbionts and saprotrophs. While asexually-typified (<i>Rhizoctonia</i> and <i>Ceratorhiza</i>) and sexually-typified (<i>Thanatephorus</i> and <i>Ceratobasidium</i>) names have been utilised, molecular studies have repeatedly demonstrated these genera to be paraphyletic. In addition, the type of <i>Ceratobasidium</i> is not congeneric with the many other species introduced in the genus. Despite previous attempts to synonymise various names under a broadly-defined <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, authors have continued to describe new species using outdated generic names. Using publicly-available ITS, LSU, <i>ATP6, RPB2</i>, and <i>TEF1</i> sequences generated from holotype specimens or from isolates obtained from permanently preserved cultures of type collections (ex-type specimens), we recovered a phylogeny of the <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> that reiterates the paraphyly of various genera within a well-supported clade to which we apply the name <i>Rhizoctonia</i>. We review the placements of names introduced in the genera <i>Ceratobasidium</i>, <i>Ceratorhiza</i>, and <i>Thanatephorus</i>, and formalise 32 new combinations in <i>Rhizoctonia</i>. While it is accepted that the type of <i>Ceratobasidium</i> does not belong in <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, we advocate continued use of the family name <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> and discuss a nomenclatural solution to formally cement this usage. Using <i>Rhizoctonia</i> as a case study, we argue that continued use of names that are evident synonyms is out of step with contemporary fungal taxonomic practice and precludes a holistic understanding of the classification and biology of this group. <b>Citation:</b> O'Donnell RP, Linde CC, May TW (2025). Rise up, <i>Rhizoctonia</i>: moving to one fungus, one name in the <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> (<i>Agaricomycetes</i>, <i>Cantharellales</i>). <i>Persoonia</i> <b>54</b>: 285-325. doi: 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09.</p>","PeriodicalId":20014,"journal":{"name":"Persoonia","volume":"54 ","pages":"285-325"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rise up, <i>Rhizoctonia</i>: moving to one fungus, one name in the <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> (<i>Agaricomycetes</i>, <i>Cantharellales</i>).\",\"authors\":\"R P O'Donnell, C C Linde, T W May\",\"doi\":\"10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> is a family of cryptic basidiomycetous fungi, most notable for the plant pathogens known under generic names such as <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, <i>Thanatephorus</i>, <i>Ceratorhiza</i>, and <i>Ceratobasidium</i>. While responsible for billions of dollars in crop losses annually, members of these genera also serve important ecological functions as orchid mycorrhizal symbionts and saprotrophs. While asexually-typified (<i>Rhizoctonia</i> and <i>Ceratorhiza</i>) and sexually-typified (<i>Thanatephorus</i> and <i>Ceratobasidium</i>) names have been utilised, molecular studies have repeatedly demonstrated these genera to be paraphyletic. In addition, the type of <i>Ceratobasidium</i> is not congeneric with the many other species introduced in the genus. Despite previous attempts to synonymise various names under a broadly-defined <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, authors have continued to describe new species using outdated generic names. Using publicly-available ITS, LSU, <i>ATP6, RPB2</i>, and <i>TEF1</i> sequences generated from holotype specimens or from isolates obtained from permanently preserved cultures of type collections (ex-type specimens), we recovered a phylogeny of the <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> that reiterates the paraphyly of various genera within a well-supported clade to which we apply the name <i>Rhizoctonia</i>. We review the placements of names introduced in the genera <i>Ceratobasidium</i>, <i>Ceratorhiza</i>, and <i>Thanatephorus</i>, and formalise 32 new combinations in <i>Rhizoctonia</i>. While it is accepted that the type of <i>Ceratobasidium</i> does not belong in <i>Rhizoctonia</i>, we advocate continued use of the family name <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> and discuss a nomenclatural solution to formally cement this usage. Using <i>Rhizoctonia</i> as a case study, we argue that continued use of names that are evident synonyms is out of step with contemporary fungal taxonomic practice and precludes a holistic understanding of the classification and biology of this group. <b>Citation:</b> O'Donnell RP, Linde CC, May TW (2025). Rise up, <i>Rhizoctonia</i>: moving to one fungus, one name in the <i>Ceratobasidiaceae</i> (<i>Agaricomycetes</i>, <i>Cantharellales</i>). <i>Persoonia</i> <b>54</b>: 285-325. doi: 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Persoonia\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"285-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Persoonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Persoonia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Ceratobasidiaceae是一种隐生担子菌属真菌,最著名的植物病原体有Rhizoctonia、Thanatephorus、Ceratobasidium和Ceratobasidium等。虽然每年造成数十亿美元的作物损失,但这些属的成员也作为兰花菌根共生体和腐殖质具有重要的生态功能。虽然无性分型(Rhizoctonia和Ceratorhiza)和性分型(Thanatephorus和Ceratobasidium)的名称已被使用,但分子研究一再证明这些属是附生的。此外,角鼻虫的类型与引入该属的许多其他物种不相同。尽管以前尝试在广泛定义的根核菌下对各种名称进行同义化,但作者继续使用过时的属名来描述新物种。利用可公开获得的ITS、LSU、ATP6、RPB2和TEF1序列,从全模式标本或从永久保存的模式集合培养物(前模式标本)中获得的分离物中获得,我们恢复了角鼻虫科的系统发育,重申了在一个得到良好支持的分支中不同属的部分,我们将其命名为根丝胞菌。我们回顾了在Ceratobasidium, Ceratorhiza和Thanatephorus属中引入的名称的位置,并在Rhizoctonia中正式确定了32个新的组合。虽然它被接受的类型,Ceratobasidium不属于根核菌,我们主张继续使用家族名称Ceratobasidiaceae和讨论命名的解决方案,以正式巩固这一用法。以根丝核菌为例,我们认为继续使用明显的同义词名称与当代真菌分类实践不一致,并且妨碍了对这一群体的分类和生物学的全面理解。引用本文:O'Donnell RP, Linde CC, May TW(2025)。崛起,根丝胞菌:在角孢菌科(木链菌,Cantharellales)中,移动到一个真菌,一个名称。《人》54:285-325。doi: 10.3114 / persoonia.2025.54.09。
Rise up, Rhizoctonia: moving to one fungus, one name in the Ceratobasidiaceae (Agaricomycetes, Cantharellales).
Ceratobasidiaceae is a family of cryptic basidiomycetous fungi, most notable for the plant pathogens known under generic names such as Rhizoctonia, Thanatephorus, Ceratorhiza, and Ceratobasidium. While responsible for billions of dollars in crop losses annually, members of these genera also serve important ecological functions as orchid mycorrhizal symbionts and saprotrophs. While asexually-typified (Rhizoctonia and Ceratorhiza) and sexually-typified (Thanatephorus and Ceratobasidium) names have been utilised, molecular studies have repeatedly demonstrated these genera to be paraphyletic. In addition, the type of Ceratobasidium is not congeneric with the many other species introduced in the genus. Despite previous attempts to synonymise various names under a broadly-defined Rhizoctonia, authors have continued to describe new species using outdated generic names. Using publicly-available ITS, LSU, ATP6, RPB2, and TEF1 sequences generated from holotype specimens or from isolates obtained from permanently preserved cultures of type collections (ex-type specimens), we recovered a phylogeny of the Ceratobasidiaceae that reiterates the paraphyly of various genera within a well-supported clade to which we apply the name Rhizoctonia. We review the placements of names introduced in the genera Ceratobasidium, Ceratorhiza, and Thanatephorus, and formalise 32 new combinations in Rhizoctonia. While it is accepted that the type of Ceratobasidium does not belong in Rhizoctonia, we advocate continued use of the family name Ceratobasidiaceae and discuss a nomenclatural solution to formally cement this usage. Using Rhizoctonia as a case study, we argue that continued use of names that are evident synonyms is out of step with contemporary fungal taxonomic practice and precludes a holistic understanding of the classification and biology of this group. Citation: O'Donnell RP, Linde CC, May TW (2025). Rise up, Rhizoctonia: moving to one fungus, one name in the Ceratobasidiaceae (Agaricomycetes, Cantharellales). Persoonia54: 285-325. doi: 10.3114/persoonia.2025.54.09.
期刊介绍:
Persoonia aspires to publish papers focusing on the molecular systematics and evolution of fungi. Additionally, it seeks to advance fungal taxonomy by employing a polythetic approach to elucidate the genuine phylogeny and relationships within the kingdom Fungi. The journal is dedicated to disseminating high-quality papers that unravel both known and novel fungal taxa at the DNA level. Moreover, it endeavors to provide fresh insights into evolutionary processes and relationships. The scope of papers considered encompasses research articles, along with topical and book reviews.