评估肥胖患者体重偏倚内化的性别差异的混合方法。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70084
Marianne O Olaniran, Jackson Francis, Sitapriya Neti, Dhatri Polavarapu, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz
{"title":"评估肥胖患者体重偏倚内化的性别差异的混合方法。","authors":"Marianne O Olaniran, Jackson Francis, Sitapriya Neti, Dhatri Polavarapu, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with obesity frequently encounter weight bias, which can contribute to the internalization of negative weight-related attitudes. This study examined sex differences in self-reported weight bias internalization among a racially and ethnically diverse sample of adults with obesity engaged in treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed method approach was used. Weight bias internalization was assessed quantitatively using the 11-item weight bias internalization scale (WBIS) and qualitatively through in-depth interviews. Sex differences were examined with univariate and multivariate linear regressions. Interviews were thematically analyzed to explore sex differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis (<i>n</i> = 60, 62% female) revealed that non-Hispanic White individuals with obesity exhibited significantly greater weight bias internalization than non-Hispanic Black individuals with obesity. There was no significant difference in mean WBIS scores between males (4.15 ± 1.34; <i>p</i> = 0.13) and females (3.68 ± 1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Qualitative analysis (<i>n</i> = 24, 50% female) identified themes such as childhood trauma, self-esteem, health challenges, discrimination, and social interactions. No major conceptual differences emerged in the internalization of weight bias between male and female participants. However, female participants mostly described weight bias internalization as contributing to social avoidance and negatively impacting their career prospects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative analyses indicated no statistically significant sex differences in weight bias internalization, and qualitative findings revealed no substantial conceptual differences between male and female participants. Future research should explore socioecological factors such as race/ethnicity, relationship status, and employment to identify populations at greater risk and inform targeted strategies for improving health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 4","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed Methods to Assess Sex Differences in Weight Bias Internalization Among Patients With Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne O Olaniran, Jackson Francis, Sitapriya Neti, Dhatri Polavarapu, Eda G Kapti, M Sunil Mathew, Jeffrey N Schellinger, Marlyn A Allicock, Sarah E Messiah, Jaime P Almandoz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with obesity frequently encounter weight bias, which can contribute to the internalization of negative weight-related attitudes. This study examined sex differences in self-reported weight bias internalization among a racially and ethnically diverse sample of adults with obesity engaged in treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed method approach was used. Weight bias internalization was assessed quantitatively using the 11-item weight bias internalization scale (WBIS) and qualitatively through in-depth interviews. Sex differences were examined with univariate and multivariate linear regressions. Interviews were thematically analyzed to explore sex differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis (<i>n</i> = 60, 62% female) revealed that non-Hispanic White individuals with obesity exhibited significantly greater weight bias internalization than non-Hispanic Black individuals with obesity. There was no significant difference in mean WBIS scores between males (4.15 ± 1.34; <i>p</i> = 0.13) and females (3.68 ± 1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Qualitative analysis (<i>n</i> = 24, 50% female) identified themes such as childhood trauma, self-esteem, health challenges, discrimination, and social interactions. No major conceptual differences emerged in the internalization of weight bias between male and female participants. However, female participants mostly described weight bias internalization as contributing to social avoidance and negatively impacting their career prospects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative analyses indicated no statistically significant sex differences in weight bias internalization, and qualitative findings revealed no substantial conceptual differences between male and female participants. Future research should explore socioecological factors such as race/ethnicity, relationship status, and employment to identify populations at greater risk and inform targeted strategies for improving health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e70084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖个体经常遇到体重偏见,这可能有助于内化与体重相关的负面态度。本研究调查了在接受治疗的不同种族和民族的肥胖成人样本中,自我报告的体重偏见内化的性别差异。方法:采用混合方法。采用11项权重偏差内化量表(WBIS)进行定量评估,并通过深度访谈进行定性评估。用单变量和多变量线性回归检验性别差异。对访谈进行主题分析,以探索性别差异。结果:定量分析(n = 60, 62%为女性)显示,非西班牙裔白人肥胖个体比非西班牙裔黑人肥胖个体表现出更大的体重偏见内化。男性患者的平均WBIS评分无显著差异(4.15±1.34;P = 0.13),女性(3.68±1.02;p = 0.13)。定性分析(n = 24, 50%为女性)确定了诸如童年创伤、自尊、健康挑战、歧视和社会互动等主题。在男性和女性参与者之间,体重偏见的内化没有出现重大的概念差异。然而,女性参与者大多认为体重偏见内化导致了社交回避,并对她们的职业前景产生了负面影响。结论:定量分析表明,在体重偏见内化方面没有统计学意义上的性别差异,定性研究结果显示,男性和女性参与者在概念上没有实质性差异。未来的研究应探索社会生态因素,如种族/民族、关系状况和就业,以确定风险较大的人群,并为改善健康结果提供有针对性的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mixed Methods to Assess Sex Differences in Weight Bias Internalization Among Patients With Obesity.

Mixed Methods to Assess Sex Differences in Weight Bias Internalization Among Patients With Obesity.

Background: Individuals with obesity frequently encounter weight bias, which can contribute to the internalization of negative weight-related attitudes. This study examined sex differences in self-reported weight bias internalization among a racially and ethnically diverse sample of adults with obesity engaged in treatment.

Methods: Mixed method approach was used. Weight bias internalization was assessed quantitatively using the 11-item weight bias internalization scale (WBIS) and qualitatively through in-depth interviews. Sex differences were examined with univariate and multivariate linear regressions. Interviews were thematically analyzed to explore sex differences.

Results: Quantitative analysis (n = 60, 62% female) revealed that non-Hispanic White individuals with obesity exhibited significantly greater weight bias internalization than non-Hispanic Black individuals with obesity. There was no significant difference in mean WBIS scores between males (4.15 ± 1.34; p = 0.13) and females (3.68 ± 1.02; p = 0.13). Qualitative analysis (n = 24, 50% female) identified themes such as childhood trauma, self-esteem, health challenges, discrimination, and social interactions. No major conceptual differences emerged in the internalization of weight bias between male and female participants. However, female participants mostly described weight bias internalization as contributing to social avoidance and negatively impacting their career prospects.

Conclusion: Quantitative analyses indicated no statistically significant sex differences in weight bias internalization, and qualitative findings revealed no substantial conceptual differences between male and female participants. Future research should explore socioecological factors such as race/ethnicity, relationship status, and employment to identify populations at greater risk and inform targeted strategies for improving health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信