Rachel H Park, Ugochukwu K Odega, Robert G DeVito, Jesse Chou, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix
{"title":"经腹平面(TAP)阻滞在腹部组织游离皮瓣乳房重建中的效果。","authors":"Rachel H Park, Ugochukwu K Odega, Robert G DeVito, Jesse Chou, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix","doi":"10.1055/a-2671-7296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regional blocks are effective adjuncts in autologous breast reconstruction. Data on specific regional blocks and agents remain unclear.We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent abdominal free flap breast reconstruction between July 2017 and June 2022. A total of 256 patients were included with 181 who received Exparel transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, 54 with non-Exparel TAP blocks, and 21 without a TAP block. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and average total MME were collected.Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-Exparel TAP block cohort, there was no difference in LOS (2.71 vs. 2.72 days, <i>p</i> = 0.96), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 0.56 days, <i>p</i> = 0.18), daily MME (29.08 vs. 29.71 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.85), and total MME (113.69 vs. 113.92 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.99). Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-TAP block cohort, there were significant differences in LOS (2.71 vs. 3.62 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 1.1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001), daily MME (29.08 vs. 39.56, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and total MME (113.69 vs. 195.55, <i>p</i> = 0.001). When comparing the non-Exparel TAP block cohort and the non-TAP block cohort, there were differences in LOS (2.72 vs. 3.62 days, <i>p</i> = 0.004), ICU LOS (0.56 vs. 1.1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and total MME (113.92 vs. 195.55 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.006).TAP block can effectively reduce the LOS and postoperative narcotic use in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction regardless of the choice of local anesthetic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominal Tissue Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel H Park, Ugochukwu K Odega, Robert G DeVito, Jesse Chou, Chris A Campbell, John T Stranix\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2671-7296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regional blocks are effective adjuncts in autologous breast reconstruction. Data on specific regional blocks and agents remain unclear.We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent abdominal free flap breast reconstruction between July 2017 and June 2022. A total of 256 patients were included with 181 who received Exparel transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, 54 with non-Exparel TAP blocks, and 21 without a TAP block. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and average total MME were collected.Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-Exparel TAP block cohort, there was no difference in LOS (2.71 vs. 2.72 days, <i>p</i> = 0.96), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 0.56 days, <i>p</i> = 0.18), daily MME (29.08 vs. 29.71 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.85), and total MME (113.69 vs. 113.92 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.99). Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-TAP block cohort, there were significant differences in LOS (2.71 vs. 3.62 days, <i>p</i> = 0.003), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 1.1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001), daily MME (29.08 vs. 39.56, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and total MME (113.69 vs. 195.55, <i>p</i> = 0.001). When comparing the non-Exparel TAP block cohort and the non-TAP block cohort, there were differences in LOS (2.72 vs. 3.62 days, <i>p</i> = 0.004), ICU LOS (0.56 vs. 1.1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.04), and total MME (113.92 vs. 195.55 MME, <i>p</i> = 0.006).TAP block can effectively reduce the LOS and postoperative narcotic use in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction regardless of the choice of local anesthetic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2671-7296\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2671-7296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:局部阻滞是自体乳房再造术的有效辅助手段。具体区域阻滞和药物的数据尚不清楚。方法:我们对2017年7月至2022年6月期间接受腹部游离皮瓣乳房重建术的患者进行回顾性分析。共纳入256例患者,其中181例接受Exparel TAP阻滞,54例接受非Exparel TAP阻滞,21例未接受TAP阻滞。收集住院时间、ICU住院时间、平均每日MME、平均总MME。结果:Exparel TAP Block队列与非Exparel TAP Block队列比较,LOS (2.71 vs 2.72天,p = 0.96)、ICU LOS (0.35 vs 0.56天,p = 0.18)、Daily MME (29.08 vs 29.71 MME, p = 0.85)和Total MME (113.69 vs 113.92 MME, p = 0.99)均无差异。Exparel TAP Block队列和Non-TAP Block队列比较,LOS (2.71 vs. 3.62天,p = 0.003)、ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 1.1天,p = 0.001)、Daily MME (29.08 vs. 39.56, p = 0.04)和total MME (113.69 vs. 195.55, p = 0.001)存在显著差异。当比较非exparel TAP Block队列和非TAP Block队列时,LOS (2.72 vs. 3.62天,p = 0.004)、ICU LOS (0.56 vs. 1.1天,p = 0.04)和总MME (113.92 vs. 195.55 MME, p = 0.006)存在差异。结论:无论选择何种局麻药,TAP阻滞均能有效减少自体乳房再造术患者的住院时间和术后麻醉的使用。
The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Abdominal Tissue Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Regional blocks are effective adjuncts in autologous breast reconstruction. Data on specific regional blocks and agents remain unclear.We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent abdominal free flap breast reconstruction between July 2017 and June 2022. A total of 256 patients were included with 181 who received Exparel transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, 54 with non-Exparel TAP blocks, and 21 without a TAP block. Length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and average total MME were collected.Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-Exparel TAP block cohort, there was no difference in LOS (2.71 vs. 2.72 days, p = 0.96), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 0.56 days, p = 0.18), daily MME (29.08 vs. 29.71 MME, p = 0.85), and total MME (113.69 vs. 113.92 MME, p = 0.99). Comparing the Exparel TAP block cohort and non-TAP block cohort, there were significant differences in LOS (2.71 vs. 3.62 days, p = 0.003), ICU LOS (0.35 vs. 1.1 days, p = 0.001), daily MME (29.08 vs. 39.56, p = 0.04), and total MME (113.69 vs. 195.55, p = 0.001). When comparing the non-Exparel TAP block cohort and the non-TAP block cohort, there were differences in LOS (2.72 vs. 3.62 days, p = 0.004), ICU LOS (0.56 vs. 1.1 days, p = 0.04), and total MME (113.92 vs. 195.55 MME, p = 0.006).TAP block can effectively reduce the LOS and postoperative narcotic use in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction regardless of the choice of local anesthetic.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.