接受神经康复治疗的老年多发性硬化症患者的性别差异:有多少事情是理所当然的?回顾性研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Davide Cardile, Maria Grazia Maggio, Lilla Bonanno, Mirjam Bonanno, Rosaria De Luca, Francesco Corallo, Fausto Famà, Amelia Rizzo, Angelo Quartarone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
{"title":"接受神经康复治疗的老年多发性硬化症患者的性别差异:有多少事情是理所当然的?回顾性研究。","authors":"Davide Cardile, Maria Grazia Maggio, Lilla Bonanno, Mirjam Bonanno, Rosaria De Luca, Francesco Corallo, Fausto Famà, Amelia Rizzo, Angelo Quartarone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò","doi":"10.1177/08919887251354899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOur aim is to evaluate the intricate dynamics of gender differences in cognitive rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with MS undergoing cognitive rehabilitation using robotics plus virtual reality.MethodsThis retrospective study included 80 RRMS patients aged >60 years, matched for demographic and clinical variables and divided into two groups. The experimental group (EG, n = 40) received Lokomat Free-D training with VR integration, while the control group (CG, n = 40) underwent traditional rehabilitation. Cognitive, functional, and emotional outcomes were assessed before and after treatment.ResultsIntergroup analysis revealed significantly greater improvements in the EG compared to the CG in MoCA (<i>P</i> < 0.001 in males, <i>P</i> = 0.001 in females), FIM (<i>P</i> = 0.02 in females), and HRS-A (<i>P</i> = 0.01 in males, <i>P</i> = 0.005 in females). Within-group analyses showed that both males and females in the EG experienced significant improvements across all domains (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but in the CG, improvements were more limited, particularly in mood scores. Notably, a positive correlation between MoCA and gender was found in EG (r = 0.47; <i>P</i> = 0.002), suggesting stronger cognitive gains among women.ConclusionOur results provide preliminary data on the influence of gender differences on neurological rehabilitation outcomes, which should be evaluated and taken into due consideration to personalize and improve rehabilitation treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251354899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Differences in Elderly Multiple Sclerosis Patients Undergoing Neurorehabilitation: How Many Things are Taken for Granted? A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Cardile, Maria Grazia Maggio, Lilla Bonanno, Mirjam Bonanno, Rosaria De Luca, Francesco Corallo, Fausto Famà, Amelia Rizzo, Angelo Quartarone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887251354899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundOur aim is to evaluate the intricate dynamics of gender differences in cognitive rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with MS undergoing cognitive rehabilitation using robotics plus virtual reality.MethodsThis retrospective study included 80 RRMS patients aged >60 years, matched for demographic and clinical variables and divided into two groups. The experimental group (EG, n = 40) received Lokomat Free-D training with VR integration, while the control group (CG, n = 40) underwent traditional rehabilitation. Cognitive, functional, and emotional outcomes were assessed before and after treatment.ResultsIntergroup analysis revealed significantly greater improvements in the EG compared to the CG in MoCA (<i>P</i> < 0.001 in males, <i>P</i> = 0.001 in females), FIM (<i>P</i> = 0.02 in females), and HRS-A (<i>P</i> = 0.01 in males, <i>P</i> = 0.005 in females). Within-group analyses showed that both males and females in the EG experienced significant improvements across all domains (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but in the CG, improvements were more limited, particularly in mood scores. Notably, a positive correlation between MoCA and gender was found in EG (r = 0.47; <i>P</i> = 0.002), suggesting stronger cognitive gains among women.ConclusionOur results provide preliminary data on the influence of gender differences on neurological rehabilitation outcomes, which should be evaluated and taken into due consideration to personalize and improve rehabilitation treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8919887251354899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251354899\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251354899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是评估使用机器人技术和虚拟现实技术进行认知康复的老年MS患者认知康复结果的性别差异的复杂动态。方法回顾性研究80例RRMS患者,年龄80 ~ 60岁,人口学和临床变量匹配,分为两组。实验组(EG, n = 40)采用Lokomat Free-D结合VR训练,对照组(CG, n = 40)采用传统康复治疗。治疗前后分别评估认知、功能和情绪结果。结果组间分析显示,与MoCA组相比,EG(男性P < 0.001,女性P = 0.001)、FIM(女性P = 0.02)和hr - a(男性P = 0.01,女性P = 0.005)的改善显著高于MoCA组。组内分析显示,EG中的男性和女性在所有领域都有显著改善(P < 0.001),但在CG中,改善更为有限,特别是在情绪得分方面。值得注意的是,在EG中,MoCA与性别呈正相关(r = 0.47;P = 0.002),表明女性的认知能力提高更强。结论本研究结果为性别差异对神经系统康复结果的影响提供了初步数据,应加以评估和考虑,以个性化和改进康复治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Differences in Elderly Multiple Sclerosis Patients Undergoing Neurorehabilitation: How Many Things are Taken for Granted? A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundOur aim is to evaluate the intricate dynamics of gender differences in cognitive rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with MS undergoing cognitive rehabilitation using robotics plus virtual reality.MethodsThis retrospective study included 80 RRMS patients aged >60 years, matched for demographic and clinical variables and divided into two groups. The experimental group (EG, n = 40) received Lokomat Free-D training with VR integration, while the control group (CG, n = 40) underwent traditional rehabilitation. Cognitive, functional, and emotional outcomes were assessed before and after treatment.ResultsIntergroup analysis revealed significantly greater improvements in the EG compared to the CG in MoCA (P < 0.001 in males, P = 0.001 in females), FIM (P = 0.02 in females), and HRS-A (P = 0.01 in males, P = 0.005 in females). Within-group analyses showed that both males and females in the EG experienced significant improvements across all domains (P < 0.001), but in the CG, improvements were more limited, particularly in mood scores. Notably, a positive correlation between MoCA and gender was found in EG (r = 0.47; P = 0.002), suggesting stronger cognitive gains among women.ConclusionOur results provide preliminary data on the influence of gender differences on neurological rehabilitation outcomes, which should be evaluated and taken into due consideration to personalize and improve rehabilitation treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信