波多黎各老年人的肠道健康、泻药使用和认知功能。

IF 2.1 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jare/2674457
Deepika Dinesh, Jong Soo Lee, Tammy M Scott, Katherine L Tucker, Natalia Palacios
{"title":"波多黎各老年人的肠道健康、泻药使用和认知功能。","authors":"Deepika Dinesh, Jong Soo Lee, Tammy M Scott, Katherine L Tucker, Natalia Palacios","doi":"10.1155/jare/2674457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Bowel dysfunction and habitual laxative use are indicators of poor gastrointestinal (GI) health and are inversely associated with cognitive function. These associations are understudied in Latino and Hispanic populations. Therefore, we examined the associations between bowel frequency, stool type, laxative use, and cognitive function in the Boston Puerto Rican Health Study (BPRHS). <b>Methods:</b> The BPRHS is a prospective cohort that enrolled 1502 Puerto Rican adults residing in the Boston Area, aged 45-75 years at baseline, with four waves of collection across 13 years. Cognitive function was measured using a composite global cognitive score (GCS) with low scores indicating worse cognitive function. Bowel health at Wave 4 was assessed by self-reported bowel frequency (times/day) and stool type. Self-reported laxative use (yes/no) was assessed at baseline and Wave 4. Adjusting for relevant covariates, we examined cross-sectional association between bowel frequency, stool type and GCS at Wave 4, and serial cross-sectional associations between laxative use and GCS at baseline and Wave 4. We used linear mixed models to examine time-varying laxative use and GCS over 13 years of follow-up. <b>Results:</b> At Wave 4, 155 (27.1%), 235 (41.0%), and 183 (31.9%) participants self-reported normal, low, and high bowel frequency, respectively, and 334 (65.9%), 72 (14.2%), and 101(19.9%) self-reported normal, hard, and loose stool type, respectively. At Wave 4, participants with high bowel frequency had low GCS (<i>β</i> = -0.152, <i>p</i>=0.02), but stool type was not associated with GCS. Self-reported laxative use increased from 6.8% (baseline) to 18.4% (Wave 4). Laxative users had low GCS at baseline (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i>=0.01) and Wave 4 (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i>=0.05). However, laxative use was not associated with a change in GCS over 13 years of follow-up (laxative use∗time <i>β</i> = 0.006, <i>p</i>=0.28). <b>Conclusion:</b> Low or high bowel frequency and laxative use may be inversely associated with cognitive function. Our results suggest a relationship between bowel and cognitive health. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231958.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2674457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bowel Health, Laxative Use, and Cognitive Function in Older Puerto Rican Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Deepika Dinesh, Jong Soo Lee, Tammy M Scott, Katherine L Tucker, Natalia Palacios\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jare/2674457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Bowel dysfunction and habitual laxative use are indicators of poor gastrointestinal (GI) health and are inversely associated with cognitive function. These associations are understudied in Latino and Hispanic populations. Therefore, we examined the associations between bowel frequency, stool type, laxative use, and cognitive function in the Boston Puerto Rican Health Study (BPRHS). <b>Methods:</b> The BPRHS is a prospective cohort that enrolled 1502 Puerto Rican adults residing in the Boston Area, aged 45-75 years at baseline, with four waves of collection across 13 years. Cognitive function was measured using a composite global cognitive score (GCS) with low scores indicating worse cognitive function. Bowel health at Wave 4 was assessed by self-reported bowel frequency (times/day) and stool type. Self-reported laxative use (yes/no) was assessed at baseline and Wave 4. Adjusting for relevant covariates, we examined cross-sectional association between bowel frequency, stool type and GCS at Wave 4, and serial cross-sectional associations between laxative use and GCS at baseline and Wave 4. We used linear mixed models to examine time-varying laxative use and GCS over 13 years of follow-up. <b>Results:</b> At Wave 4, 155 (27.1%), 235 (41.0%), and 183 (31.9%) participants self-reported normal, low, and high bowel frequency, respectively, and 334 (65.9%), 72 (14.2%), and 101(19.9%) self-reported normal, hard, and loose stool type, respectively. At Wave 4, participants with high bowel frequency had low GCS (<i>β</i> = -0.152, <i>p</i>=0.02), but stool type was not associated with GCS. Self-reported laxative use increased from 6.8% (baseline) to 18.4% (Wave 4). Laxative users had low GCS at baseline (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i>=0.01) and Wave 4 (<i>β</i> = -0.13, <i>p</i>=0.05). However, laxative use was not associated with a change in GCS over 13 years of follow-up (laxative use∗time <i>β</i> = 0.006, <i>p</i>=0.28). <b>Conclusion:</b> Low or high bowel frequency and laxative use may be inversely associated with cognitive function. Our results suggest a relationship between bowel and cognitive health. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231958.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Research\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2674457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313385/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/2674457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/2674457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肠功能障碍和习惯性使用泻药是胃肠道(GI)健康状况不佳的指标,与认知功能呈负相关。这些关联在拉丁裔和西班牙裔人群中尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们在波士顿波多黎各健康研究(BPRHS)中研究了排便频率、大便类型、泻药使用和认知功能之间的关系。方法:BPRHS是一项前瞻性队列研究,招募了1502名居住在波士顿地区的波多黎各成年人,基线年龄为45-75岁,在13年内进行了四次收集。认知功能采用综合整体认知评分(GCS)测量,得分低表明认知功能较差。第4阶段的肠道健康状况通过自我报告的排便频率(次/天)和大便类型进行评估。自我报告的泻药使用情况(是/否)在基线和第4期进行评估。调整相关协变量后,我们检查了第4阶段排便频率、大便类型与GCS之间的横断面关联,以及基线和第4阶段通便药使用与GCS之间的连续横断面关联。我们使用线性混合模型在13年的随访中检查随时间变化的泻药使用和GCS。结果:在第4波,155(27.1%)、235(41.0%)和183(31.9%)参与者分别自我报告正常、低和高排便频率,334(65.9%)、72(14.2%)和101(19.9%)参与者分别自我报告正常、硬便和稀便类型。在第4阶段,排便频率高的受试者GCS较低(β = -0.152, p=0.02),但大便类型与GCS无关。自我报告的泻药使用从6.8%(基线)增加到18.4%(第四波)。通便药使用者在基线(β = -0.13, p=0.01)和波4 (β = -0.13, p=0.05)时GCS较低。然而,在13年的随访中,泻药的使用与GCS的变化无关(泻药使用*时间β = 0.006, p=0.28)。结论:低或高的排便频率和泻药的使用可能与认知功能呈负相关。我们的研究结果表明,肠道和认知健康之间存在关系。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01231958。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bowel Health, Laxative Use, and Cognitive Function in Older Puerto Rican Adults.

Bowel Health, Laxative Use, and Cognitive Function in Older Puerto Rican Adults.

Bowel Health, Laxative Use, and Cognitive Function in Older Puerto Rican Adults.

Bowel Health, Laxative Use, and Cognitive Function in Older Puerto Rican Adults.

Objectives: Bowel dysfunction and habitual laxative use are indicators of poor gastrointestinal (GI) health and are inversely associated with cognitive function. These associations are understudied in Latino and Hispanic populations. Therefore, we examined the associations between bowel frequency, stool type, laxative use, and cognitive function in the Boston Puerto Rican Health Study (BPRHS). Methods: The BPRHS is a prospective cohort that enrolled 1502 Puerto Rican adults residing in the Boston Area, aged 45-75 years at baseline, with four waves of collection across 13 years. Cognitive function was measured using a composite global cognitive score (GCS) with low scores indicating worse cognitive function. Bowel health at Wave 4 was assessed by self-reported bowel frequency (times/day) and stool type. Self-reported laxative use (yes/no) was assessed at baseline and Wave 4. Adjusting for relevant covariates, we examined cross-sectional association between bowel frequency, stool type and GCS at Wave 4, and serial cross-sectional associations between laxative use and GCS at baseline and Wave 4. We used linear mixed models to examine time-varying laxative use and GCS over 13 years of follow-up. Results: At Wave 4, 155 (27.1%), 235 (41.0%), and 183 (31.9%) participants self-reported normal, low, and high bowel frequency, respectively, and 334 (65.9%), 72 (14.2%), and 101(19.9%) self-reported normal, hard, and loose stool type, respectively. At Wave 4, participants with high bowel frequency had low GCS (β = -0.152, p=0.02), but stool type was not associated with GCS. Self-reported laxative use increased from 6.8% (baseline) to 18.4% (Wave 4). Laxative users had low GCS at baseline (β = -0.13, p=0.01) and Wave 4 (β = -0.13, p=0.05). However, laxative use was not associated with a change in GCS over 13 years of follow-up (laxative use∗time β = 0.006, p=0.28). Conclusion: Low or high bowel frequency and laxative use may be inversely associated with cognitive function. Our results suggest a relationship between bowel and cognitive health. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01231958.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信