严重精神疾病成人社会包容的预测因素:一项横断面研究的结果。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mara Ohlhoff, Alexander Pabst, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne
{"title":"严重精神疾病成人社会包容的预测因素:一项横断面研究的结果。","authors":"Mara Ohlhoff, Alexander Pabst, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne","doi":"10.1177/00207640251350218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Promoting social inclusion is crucial for people living with severe mental illness (SMI), who often experience high levels of social exclusion. However, research that uses a psychometric social inclusion measure to identify factors that determine varying levels of social inclusion in individuals with SMI is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to examine to what extent people with SMI feel socially included and to identify factors associated with perceived social inclusion among people with SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional multicenter investigation of psychiatric inpatients and day hospital patients with SMI aged 18 to 65 years (<i>n</i> = 358) was conducted. Perceived social inclusion, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were assessed using the Measure of Participation and Social Inclusion for Use in People with a Chronic Mental Disorder (F-INK). Hierarchical multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the association between social inclusion and potential predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' overall level of social inclusion was moderate (F-INK social inclusion total score <i>M</i> = 1.9, <i>SD</i> = 0.6). Age, relationship status, diagnostic group, employment status, and living situation emerged as predictors of social inclusion. Greater subjective social inclusion was predicted by older age (<i>p</i> = .027), being in a committed intimate relationship (<i>p</i> = .037), diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (compared to diagnosis of depression, <i>p</i> = .020), being competitively employed or in education (compared to being in sheltered employment, <i>p</i> = .022; compared to being unemployed or receiving a disability pension, <i>p</i> = .007), and living with other people (<i>p</i> = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirm deficiencies in social inclusion of people with SMI. Individuals with SMI who are younger, single, have a diagnosis of depression, are in sheltered employment, are unemployed or receiving a disability pension, and are living alone seem to be particularly at risk of experiencing low social inclusion. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial interventions in rehabilitative mental healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251350218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of social inclusion among adults with severe mental illness: Results of a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Mara Ohlhoff, Alexander Pabst, Johanna Breilmann, Thomas Becker, Andreas Allgöwer, Reinhold Kilian, Alkomiet Hasan, Peter Falkai, Klemens Ajayi, Theresa Halms, Peter Brieger, Karel Frasch, Stephan Heres, Markus Jäger, Andreas Küthmann, Albert Putzhammer, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Bertram Schneeweiß, Michael Schwarz, Markus Kösters, Uta Gühne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251350218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Promoting social inclusion is crucial for people living with severe mental illness (SMI), who often experience high levels of social exclusion. However, research that uses a psychometric social inclusion measure to identify factors that determine varying levels of social inclusion in individuals with SMI is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to examine to what extent people with SMI feel socially included and to identify factors associated with perceived social inclusion among people with SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional multicenter investigation of psychiatric inpatients and day hospital patients with SMI aged 18 to 65 years (<i>n</i> = 358) was conducted. Perceived social inclusion, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were assessed using the Measure of Participation and Social Inclusion for Use in People with a Chronic Mental Disorder (F-INK). Hierarchical multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the association between social inclusion and potential predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' overall level of social inclusion was moderate (F-INK social inclusion total score <i>M</i> = 1.9, <i>SD</i> = 0.6). Age, relationship status, diagnostic group, employment status, and living situation emerged as predictors of social inclusion. Greater subjective social inclusion was predicted by older age (<i>p</i> = .027), being in a committed intimate relationship (<i>p</i> = .037), diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (compared to diagnosis of depression, <i>p</i> = .020), being competitively employed or in education (compared to being in sheltered employment, <i>p</i> = .022; compared to being unemployed or receiving a disability pension, <i>p</i> = .007), and living with other people (<i>p</i> = .042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results confirm deficiencies in social inclusion of people with SMI. Individuals with SMI who are younger, single, have a diagnosis of depression, are in sheltered employment, are unemployed or receiving a disability pension, and are living alone seem to be particularly at risk of experiencing low social inclusion. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial interventions in rehabilitative mental healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251350218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251350218\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251350218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:促进社会包容对于患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人来说至关重要,他们经常经历高度的社会排斥。然而,使用心理测量社会包容测量来确定决定重度精神分裂症患者不同社会包容水平的因素的研究很少。目的:本研究旨在研究重度精神障碍患者感受到社会包容的程度,并确定与重度精神障碍患者感知社会包容相关的因素。方法:对18 ~ 65岁精神科住院和日间住院的重度精神障碍患者(n = 358)进行横断面多中心调查。使用慢性精神障碍患者参与和社会融入量表(F-INK)评估感知社会融入、社会人口学和临床特征。采用层次多元线性回归分析社会包容与潜在预测因子之间的关系。结果:被试的社会包容总体水平为中等水平(F-INK社会包容总分M = 1.9, SD = 0.6)。年龄、关系状况、诊断组、就业状况和生活状况成为社会包容的预测因素。更大的主观社会包容被预测为年龄较大(p = 0.027),处于忠诚的亲密关系中(p = 0.037),诊断为精神分裂症谱系障碍(与诊断为抑郁症相比,p = 0.020),竞争就业或教育(与在庇护就业相比,p = 0.022;与失业或领取残疾养老金(p = .007)和与他人同住(p = .042)相比。结论:结果证实了重度精神障碍患者在社会包容方面的缺陷。年轻的、单身的、被诊断为抑郁症的、受保护的就业、失业或领取残疾养老金的、独居的重度精神障碍患者似乎特别容易经历低社会包容性。这些发现强调了心理社会干预在康复性精神卫生保健中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of social inclusion among adults with severe mental illness: Results of a cross-sectional study.

Background: Promoting social inclusion is crucial for people living with severe mental illness (SMI), who often experience high levels of social exclusion. However, research that uses a psychometric social inclusion measure to identify factors that determine varying levels of social inclusion in individuals with SMI is scarce.

Aims: This study aimed to examine to what extent people with SMI feel socially included and to identify factors associated with perceived social inclusion among people with SMI.

Method: A cross-sectional multicenter investigation of psychiatric inpatients and day hospital patients with SMI aged 18 to 65 years (n = 358) was conducted. Perceived social inclusion, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were assessed using the Measure of Participation and Social Inclusion for Use in People with a Chronic Mental Disorder (F-INK). Hierarchical multiple linear regression was performed to analyse the association between social inclusion and potential predictors.

Results: The participants' overall level of social inclusion was moderate (F-INK social inclusion total score M = 1.9, SD = 0.6). Age, relationship status, diagnostic group, employment status, and living situation emerged as predictors of social inclusion. Greater subjective social inclusion was predicted by older age (p = .027), being in a committed intimate relationship (p = .037), diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder (compared to diagnosis of depression, p = .020), being competitively employed or in education (compared to being in sheltered employment, p = .022; compared to being unemployed or receiving a disability pension, p = .007), and living with other people (p = .042).

Conclusions: The results confirm deficiencies in social inclusion of people with SMI. Individuals with SMI who are younger, single, have a diagnosis of depression, are in sheltered employment, are unemployed or receiving a disability pension, and are living alone seem to be particularly at risk of experiencing low social inclusion. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial interventions in rehabilitative mental healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信