用于筛选药物配方的加速预测稳定性(APS)策略:喷雾干燥和热熔挤压硝苯地平非晶态固体分散体的比较。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Peter O'Connell, Joshua H Yoon, Luke M Geever, Dinesh Kumar, Anne-Marie Healy, Dolores R Serrano
{"title":"用于筛选药物配方的加速预测稳定性(APS)策略:喷雾干燥和热熔挤压硝苯地平非晶态固体分散体的比较。","authors":"Peter O'Connell, Joshua H Yoon, Luke M Geever, Dinesh Kumar, Anne-Marie Healy, Dolores R Serrano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses the challenges in designing stable amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) for pharmaceutical applications, focusing on nifedipine ASDs. The research involved manufacturing four different nifedipine ASDs using scalable pharmaceutical techniques-hot melt extrusion (HME) and spray drying (SD). Two pharmaceutical grade polymers, Soluplus® and poly-vinylpyrrolidone vinyl acetate (PVPVA, Kollidon® VA64), were used as carriers. The study employed an Accelerated Predictive Stability (APS) approach to assess the stability of these formulations. This included High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for quantifying nifedipine degradation, Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) for measuring crystallisation kinetics. Additionally, Near-Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was utilised to develop Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression models, providing a cost-effective and non-destructive method to quantify physicochemical changes. The results revealed that all four ASDs significantly improved the dissolution rate of nifedipine compared to its crystalline form. However, notable differences in stability among the formulations were observed through APS. The SD powders demonstrated greater physical stability, evidenced by a single glass transition temperature, in contrast to the extrudates, which showed dual glass transition temperatures indicating phase separation. Conversely, the HME formulations exhibited superior chemical stability compared to their SD counterparts, with the latter showing increased moisture sensitivity. Additionally, the degradation kinetics of the SD formulations were more complex than those of the extruded materials. Under less extreme conditions, SD systems followed Avrami-type kinetics, whereas more extreme conditions led to a shift from Avrami to diffusion kinetics, likely due to the miscibility of degradation products with polymer chains. In conclusion, the SD-PVPVA64 ASD was identified as the most balanced formulation in terms of physical and chemical stability, making it a prime candidate for further development. The study underscores the effectiveness of the APS approach, combined with chemometrics, as a robust methodology for guiding decision-making in the development of pharmaceutical amorphous formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14187,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","volume":" ","pages":"126012"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated predictive stability (APS) strategies applied to screening pharmaceutical formulations: A comparison of spray dried and hot melt extruded nifedipine amorphous solid dispersions.\",\"authors\":\"Peter O'Connell, Joshua H Yoon, Luke M Geever, Dinesh Kumar, Anne-Marie Healy, Dolores R Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study addresses the challenges in designing stable amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) for pharmaceutical applications, focusing on nifedipine ASDs. The research involved manufacturing four different nifedipine ASDs using scalable pharmaceutical techniques-hot melt extrusion (HME) and spray drying (SD). Two pharmaceutical grade polymers, Soluplus® and poly-vinylpyrrolidone vinyl acetate (PVPVA, Kollidon® VA64), were used as carriers. The study employed an Accelerated Predictive Stability (APS) approach to assess the stability of these formulations. This included High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for quantifying nifedipine degradation, Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) for measuring crystallisation kinetics. Additionally, Near-Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was utilised to develop Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression models, providing a cost-effective and non-destructive method to quantify physicochemical changes. The results revealed that all four ASDs significantly improved the dissolution rate of nifedipine compared to its crystalline form. However, notable differences in stability among the formulations were observed through APS. The SD powders demonstrated greater physical stability, evidenced by a single glass transition temperature, in contrast to the extrudates, which showed dual glass transition temperatures indicating phase separation. Conversely, the HME formulations exhibited superior chemical stability compared to their SD counterparts, with the latter showing increased moisture sensitivity. Additionally, the degradation kinetics of the SD formulations were more complex than those of the extruded materials. Under less extreme conditions, SD systems followed Avrami-type kinetics, whereas more extreme conditions led to a shift from Avrami to diffusion kinetics, likely due to the miscibility of degradation products with polymer chains. In conclusion, the SD-PVPVA64 ASD was identified as the most balanced formulation in terms of physical and chemical stability, making it a prime candidate for further development. The study underscores the effectiveness of the APS approach, combined with chemometrics, as a robust methodology for guiding decision-making in the development of pharmaceutical amorphous formulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"126012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.126012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究解决了设计稳定的非晶固体分散体(asd)用于制药应用的挑战,重点是硝苯地平asd。该研究涉及使用可扩展的制药技术-热熔挤压(HME)和喷雾干燥(SD)制造四种不同的硝苯地平asd。用两种医药级聚合物Soluplus®和聚乙烯基吡咯烷酮醋酸乙烯酯(PVPVA, Kollidon®VA64)作为载体。该研究采用了加速预测稳定性(APS)方法来评估这些配方的稳定性。这包括用于定量硝苯地平降解的高效液相色谱(HPLC),粉末x射线衍射(PXRD)和用于测量结晶动力学的差示扫描量热法(DSC)。此外,利用近红外(NIR)光谱建立偏最小二乘(PLS)回归模型,提供了一种经济有效且无损的方法来量化理化变化。结果显示,与硝苯地平的结晶形式相比,四种asd均显著提高了硝苯地平的溶出速度。然而,通过APS观察到不同配方的稳定性有显著差异。SD粉末表现出更大的物理稳定性,单玻璃化转变温度证明了这一点,而挤出物则表现出双玻璃化转变温度,表明相分离。相反,与SD相比,HME配方表现出更好的化学稳定性,后者表现出更高的水分敏感性。此外,SD配方的降解动力学比挤出材料的降解动力学更复杂。在不太极端的条件下,SD系统遵循Avrami型动力学,而在更极端的条件下,可能由于降解产物与聚合物链的混溶,系统从Avrami型动力学转向扩散动力学。总之,SD-PVPVA64 ASD在物理和化学稳定性方面被确定为最平衡的配方,使其成为进一步开发的首选候选物。该研究强调了APS方法与化学计量学相结合的有效性,作为指导药物非晶态制剂开发决策的有力方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accelerated predictive stability (APS) strategies applied to screening pharmaceutical formulations: A comparison of spray dried and hot melt extruded nifedipine amorphous solid dispersions.

This study addresses the challenges in designing stable amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) for pharmaceutical applications, focusing on nifedipine ASDs. The research involved manufacturing four different nifedipine ASDs using scalable pharmaceutical techniques-hot melt extrusion (HME) and spray drying (SD). Two pharmaceutical grade polymers, Soluplus® and poly-vinylpyrrolidone vinyl acetate (PVPVA, Kollidon® VA64), were used as carriers. The study employed an Accelerated Predictive Stability (APS) approach to assess the stability of these formulations. This included High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for quantifying nifedipine degradation, Powder X-Ray Diffraction (PXRD), and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) for measuring crystallisation kinetics. Additionally, Near-Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was utilised to develop Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression models, providing a cost-effective and non-destructive method to quantify physicochemical changes. The results revealed that all four ASDs significantly improved the dissolution rate of nifedipine compared to its crystalline form. However, notable differences in stability among the formulations were observed through APS. The SD powders demonstrated greater physical stability, evidenced by a single glass transition temperature, in contrast to the extrudates, which showed dual glass transition temperatures indicating phase separation. Conversely, the HME formulations exhibited superior chemical stability compared to their SD counterparts, with the latter showing increased moisture sensitivity. Additionally, the degradation kinetics of the SD formulations were more complex than those of the extruded materials. Under less extreme conditions, SD systems followed Avrami-type kinetics, whereas more extreme conditions led to a shift from Avrami to diffusion kinetics, likely due to the miscibility of degradation products with polymer chains. In conclusion, the SD-PVPVA64 ASD was identified as the most balanced formulation in terms of physical and chemical stability, making it a prime candidate for further development. The study underscores the effectiveness of the APS approach, combined with chemometrics, as a robust methodology for guiding decision-making in the development of pharmaceutical amorphous formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
951
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmaceutics is the third most cited journal in the "Pharmacy & Pharmacology" category out of 366 journals, being the true home for pharmaceutical scientists concerned with the physical, chemical and biological properties of devices and delivery systems for drugs, vaccines and biologicals, including their design, manufacture and evaluation. This includes evaluation of the properties of drugs, excipients such as surfactants and polymers and novel materials. The journal has special sections on pharmaceutical nanotechnology and personalized medicines, and publishes research papers, reviews, commentaries and letters to the editor as well as special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信