丹麦截肢数据库。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Signe Hulsbæk, Morten Tange Kristensen, Ulla Riis Madsen, Veronica Leeberg, Poul Pedersen, Dea Krogh Larsen, Anne Mette Sørensen, Christen Ravn, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Rehne Lessmann Hansen
{"title":"丹麦截肢数据库。","authors":"Signe Hulsbæk, Morten Tange Kristensen, Ulla Riis Madsen, Veronica Leeberg, Poul Pedersen, Dea Krogh Larsen, Anne Mette Sørensen, Christen Ravn, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Rehne Lessmann Hansen","doi":"10.61409/A02250084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>National data has the potential to advance future research and drive quality improvements for patients with major lower-extremity amputations (MLEA). This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Danish Amputation Database (DanAmp) by investigating data completeness and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic, surgical and post-surgery data were collected during hospital admission. After implementation at three departments, completeness and validity were evaluated from 1 February to 1 June 2024. Completeness was evaluated by comparing the number of surgical procedures in the hospital's electronic system with registrations in DanAmp. Data validity was evaluated by an audit of up to 15 consecutive patient records per department. The percentage agreement was calculated (agreement (n)/total possible numbers (N)). Variables with an agreement exceeding 90% were considered satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 procedures were registered in DanAmp across the three departments, and 71 procedures were registered in the hospital's electronic system, corresponding to 96% completeness for all types of procedures. A total of 43 patient records were audited, revealing that 29 of 35 variables had a satisfactory validity exceeding 90% agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a high completeness and satisfactory validity of data from three orthopaedic departments, underscoring DanAmp's potential in driving research and quality improvements for MLEA.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The project is funded by the Region Zealand and Region of Southern Denmark Research Fund (2022) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF), grant ID: 10.46540/3165-00053B (2023).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Danish Amputation Database.\",\"authors\":\"Signe Hulsbæk, Morten Tange Kristensen, Ulla Riis Madsen, Veronica Leeberg, Poul Pedersen, Dea Krogh Larsen, Anne Mette Sørensen, Christen Ravn, Per Hviid Gundtoft, Rehne Lessmann Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.61409/A02250084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>National data has the potential to advance future research and drive quality improvements for patients with major lower-extremity amputations (MLEA). This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Danish Amputation Database (DanAmp) by investigating data completeness and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic, surgical and post-surgery data were collected during hospital admission. After implementation at three departments, completeness and validity were evaluated from 1 February to 1 June 2024. Completeness was evaluated by comparing the number of surgical procedures in the hospital's electronic system with registrations in DanAmp. Data validity was evaluated by an audit of up to 15 consecutive patient records per department. The percentage agreement was calculated (agreement (n)/total possible numbers (N)). Variables with an agreement exceeding 90% were considered satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 procedures were registered in DanAmp across the three departments, and 71 procedures were registered in the hospital's electronic system, corresponding to 96% completeness for all types of procedures. A total of 43 patient records were audited, revealing that 29 of 35 variables had a satisfactory validity exceeding 90% agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a high completeness and satisfactory validity of data from three orthopaedic departments, underscoring DanAmp's potential in driving research and quality improvements for MLEA.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The project is funded by the Region Zealand and Region of Southern Denmark Research Fund (2022) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF), grant ID: 10.46540/3165-00053B (2023).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"72 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61409/A02250084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A02250084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家数据有可能推进未来的研究,并推动重度下肢截肢(MLEA)患者的质量改善。本研究旨在通过调查数据的完整性和有效性来评估丹麦截肢数据库(DanAmp)的实施。方法:收集住院期间的人口学、手术及术后资料。在三个部门实施后,于2024年2月1日至6月1日对完整性和有效性进行了评估。通过比较医院电子系统中的外科手术数量与DanAmp中的登记数量来评估完整性。通过对每个科室多达15个连续患者记录的审计来评估数据的有效性。计算一致性百分比(一致性(n)/可能总数(n))。一致性超过90%的变量被认为是满意的。结果:三个科室在DanAmp中共登记了68个程序,在医院电子系统中登记了71个程序,各类型程序的完整度为96%。共审核了43例患者记录,发现35个变量中有29个具有令人满意的效度,一致性超过90%。结论:本研究显示了三个骨科数据的高完整性和令人满意的有效性,强调了DanAmp在推动MLEA研究和质量改进方面的潜力。项目由新西兰地区和南丹麦地区研究基金(2022)和丹麦独立研究基金(DFF)资助,资助号:10.46540/3165-00053B(2023)。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Danish Amputation Database.

Introduction: National data has the potential to advance future research and drive quality improvements for patients with major lower-extremity amputations (MLEA). This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Danish Amputation Database (DanAmp) by investigating data completeness and validity.

Methods: Demographic, surgical and post-surgery data were collected during hospital admission. After implementation at three departments, completeness and validity were evaluated from 1 February to 1 June 2024. Completeness was evaluated by comparing the number of surgical procedures in the hospital's electronic system with registrations in DanAmp. Data validity was evaluated by an audit of up to 15 consecutive patient records per department. The percentage agreement was calculated (agreement (n)/total possible numbers (N)). Variables with an agreement exceeding 90% were considered satisfactory.

Results: A total of 68 procedures were registered in DanAmp across the three departments, and 71 procedures were registered in the hospital's electronic system, corresponding to 96% completeness for all types of procedures. A total of 43 patient records were audited, revealing that 29 of 35 variables had a satisfactory validity exceeding 90% agreement.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a high completeness and satisfactory validity of data from three orthopaedic departments, underscoring DanAmp's potential in driving research and quality improvements for MLEA.

Funding: The project is funded by the Region Zealand and Region of Southern Denmark Research Fund (2022) and the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF), grant ID: 10.46540/3165-00053B (2023).

Trial registration: Not relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信