阿根廷潘帕斯湿地在全球滨鸟保护中的作用。

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
N S Martínez-Curci, J P Isacch, J L Fernández, F Bogel, J Ruiz, J G Navedo
{"title":"阿根廷潘帕斯湿地在全球滨鸟保护中的作用。","authors":"N S Martínez-Curci, J P Isacch, J L Fernández, F Bogel, J Ruiz, J G Navedo","doi":"10.1111/cobi.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Less than 10% of migratory bird species worldwide benefit from adequate protected area coverage throughout their annual cycles. This increases their vulnerability and exacerbates the global biodiversity crisis. The ongoing decline of shorebird populations, 60% of which are migratory, suggests critical gaps in current conservation strategies. One such gap is the spatial bias in surveys and monitoring efforts. Such efforts are heavily concentrated in the Global North, leaving regions in the Global South underrepresented. We assessed the importance of a vast inland region in southern South America, the Inland Pampas of Argentina, for shorebird conservation, as it supports thousands of wetlands but has been largely overlooked in shorebird research and conservation. We conducted shorebird counts in 134 wetlands across the region in January and June of 2021, 2022, and 2023. Seventeen species were recorded, including 3 of global conservation concern: white-rumped sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis), Hudsonian godwit (Limosa haemastica), and lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes). Shorebird abundance peaked in January (maximum number of approximately 30,000 individuals) and was dominated by Nearctic migrants. In contrast, June assemblages were dominated by Neotropical species and Hudsonian godwits, indicating the region serves as an important oversummering site for the latter. In June, there was also an influx of godwits from other nonbreeding areas. Three wetlands had notably high numbers of shorebirds, including populations that met criteria for international importance. Because of the abundances we found, our results underscore the urgent need to expand research efforts to identify other high-priority areas for shorebirds in the Global South. Neglecting these regions would bias global population assessments and risk omitting critical habitats from national and international conservation frameworks. Addressing these data gaps is essential not only for updating global priorities but also for promoting more inclusive and geographically balanced approaches to migratory shorebird conservation. The complete Spanish version of the manuscript is available as Supplemental Material (S2).</p>","PeriodicalId":10689,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Biology","volume":" ","pages":"e70104"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of wetlands in the Pampas of Argentina in global shorebird conservation.\",\"authors\":\"N S Martínez-Curci, J P Isacch, J L Fernández, F Bogel, J Ruiz, J G Navedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cobi.70104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Less than 10% of migratory bird species worldwide benefit from adequate protected area coverage throughout their annual cycles. This increases their vulnerability and exacerbates the global biodiversity crisis. The ongoing decline of shorebird populations, 60% of which are migratory, suggests critical gaps in current conservation strategies. One such gap is the spatial bias in surveys and monitoring efforts. Such efforts are heavily concentrated in the Global North, leaving regions in the Global South underrepresented. We assessed the importance of a vast inland region in southern South America, the Inland Pampas of Argentina, for shorebird conservation, as it supports thousands of wetlands but has been largely overlooked in shorebird research and conservation. We conducted shorebird counts in 134 wetlands across the region in January and June of 2021, 2022, and 2023. Seventeen species were recorded, including 3 of global conservation concern: white-rumped sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis), Hudsonian godwit (Limosa haemastica), and lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes). Shorebird abundance peaked in January (maximum number of approximately 30,000 individuals) and was dominated by Nearctic migrants. In contrast, June assemblages were dominated by Neotropical species and Hudsonian godwits, indicating the region serves as an important oversummering site for the latter. In June, there was also an influx of godwits from other nonbreeding areas. Three wetlands had notably high numbers of shorebirds, including populations that met criteria for international importance. Because of the abundances we found, our results underscore the urgent need to expand research efforts to identify other high-priority areas for shorebirds in the Global South. Neglecting these regions would bias global population assessments and risk omitting critical habitats from national and international conservation frameworks. Addressing these data gaps is essential not only for updating global priorities but also for promoting more inclusive and geographically balanced approaches to migratory shorebird conservation. The complete Spanish version of the manuscript is available as Supplemental Material (S2).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70104\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70104","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界不到10%的候鸟物种在其整个年周期中受益于足够的保护区覆盖。这增加了它们的脆弱性,加剧了全球生物多样性危机。滨鸟种群数量的持续下降(其中60%是候鸟)表明,目前的保护策略存在严重缺陷。其中一个差距是调查和监测工作中的空间偏差。这些努力主要集中在全球北方,使全球南方的区域代表性不足。我们评估了南美洲南部广阔的内陆地区——阿根廷内陆潘帕斯草原——对滨鸟保护的重要性,因为它支持着数千个湿地,但在滨鸟研究和保护中却被很大程度上忽视了。我们在2021年、2022年和2023年的1月和6月对该地区的134个湿地进行了滨鸟计数。记录了17个物种,其中包括3个全球保护关注的物种:白臀矶鹬(Calidris fuscicollis),哈德逊鹬(Limosa haemastica)和较小的黄腿鹬(Tringa flavipes)。滨鸟的数量在1月份达到顶峰(最大数量约为30,000只),以新北极地区的候鸟为主。6月份以新热带物种和哈德逊鹬为主,表明该地区是后者的重要越夏场所。6月,也有来自其他非繁殖区的godwit涌入。有三个湿地的滨鸟数量明显很高,其中包括符合国际重要性标准的种群。由于我们发现的丰度,我们的结果强调了迫切需要扩大研究工作,以确定全球南方其他高优先级的滨鸟区域。忽视这些地区将会影响全球人口评估,并有可能在国家和国际保护框架中遗漏关键栖息地。解决这些数据差距不仅对于更新全球优先事项,而且对于促进更包容和地理平衡的迁徙滨鸟保护方法至关重要。完整的西班牙语版本的手稿可作为补充材料(S2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of wetlands in the Pampas of Argentina in global shorebird conservation.

Less than 10% of migratory bird species worldwide benefit from adequate protected area coverage throughout their annual cycles. This increases their vulnerability and exacerbates the global biodiversity crisis. The ongoing decline of shorebird populations, 60% of which are migratory, suggests critical gaps in current conservation strategies. One such gap is the spatial bias in surveys and monitoring efforts. Such efforts are heavily concentrated in the Global North, leaving regions in the Global South underrepresented. We assessed the importance of a vast inland region in southern South America, the Inland Pampas of Argentina, for shorebird conservation, as it supports thousands of wetlands but has been largely overlooked in shorebird research and conservation. We conducted shorebird counts in 134 wetlands across the region in January and June of 2021, 2022, and 2023. Seventeen species were recorded, including 3 of global conservation concern: white-rumped sandpiper (Calidris fuscicollis), Hudsonian godwit (Limosa haemastica), and lesser yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes). Shorebird abundance peaked in January (maximum number of approximately 30,000 individuals) and was dominated by Nearctic migrants. In contrast, June assemblages were dominated by Neotropical species and Hudsonian godwits, indicating the region serves as an important oversummering site for the latter. In June, there was also an influx of godwits from other nonbreeding areas. Three wetlands had notably high numbers of shorebirds, including populations that met criteria for international importance. Because of the abundances we found, our results underscore the urgent need to expand research efforts to identify other high-priority areas for shorebirds in the Global South. Neglecting these regions would bias global population assessments and risk omitting critical habitats from national and international conservation frameworks. Addressing these data gaps is essential not only for updating global priorities but also for promoting more inclusive and geographically balanced approaches to migratory shorebird conservation. The complete Spanish version of the manuscript is available as Supplemental Material (S2).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Biology
Conservation Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving Earth's biological diversity. We encourage submissions that emphasize issues germane to any of Earth''s ecosystems or geographic regions and that apply diverse approaches to analyses and problem solving. Nevertheless, manuscripts with relevance to conservation that transcend the particular ecosystem, species, or situation described will be prioritized for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信