跨年龄和性别自杀中的冲动性和攻击性:病例对照研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Constanza Vera-Varela, Diego de-la-Vega-Sánchez, María Luisa Barrigón, Adrián Alacreu-Crespo, Julio A Guija, Ana Sánchez, Santiago de León, Enrique Baca-García, Lucas Giner
{"title":"跨年龄和性别自杀中的冲动性和攻击性:病例对照研究。","authors":"Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Constanza Vera-Varela, Diego de-la-Vega-Sánchez, María Luisa Barrigón, Adrián Alacreu-Crespo, Julio A Guija, Ana Sánchez, Santiago de León, Enrique Baca-García, Lucas Giner","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impulsivity and aggression are known risk factors for suicide, with observed age and sex differences in their impact.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore variations in impulsivity and aggression based on sex and age and examine their roles in predicting suicide.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined 582 participants (406 individuals who died by suicide, 176 non-suicidal sudden-death controls) using the psychological autopsy method. Measures of impulsivity and aggression included the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and the Brown-Goodwin History of Aggression (BGHA). Participants were categorised into four groups: suicide male, control male, suicide female and control female. For group comparisons, we used analyses of variance and Spearman's rank correlation to assess the relationship between age and BIS and/or BGHA ratings. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of suicide for each sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher levels of BIS and BGHA ratings were found in the suicide group compared with controls (BIS: 51.3 <i>v</i>. 42.2, <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.017; BGHA: 7.1 <i>v</i>. 4.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.028), with no significant sex differences. BIS and BGHA ratings decreased with age in the suicide groups (suicide male: impulsivity <i>ρ</i> = -0.327, <i>P</i> < 0.001; suicide female: aggression <i>ρ</i> = -0.175, <i>P</i> = 0.038) but not among controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for men, aggression (odds ratio 1.072, 95% CI: 1.032-1.112) was a key predictor. For women, younger age (odds ratio 0.970, 95% CI: 0.948-0.993), low BIS impulsivity ratings (odds ratio 1.018, 95% CI: 1.001-1.036) and living with children (odds ratio 0.448, 95% CI: 0.208-0.966) were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impulsive and aggressive behaviours are critical factors in suicide risk among younger individuals, indicating an age effect but no sex dimorphism, with aggressive behaviours being a better predictor for men and impulsive and aggressive behaviours for women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impulsivity and aggression in suicide across age and sex: case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Constanza Vera-Varela, Diego de-la-Vega-Sánchez, María Luisa Barrigón, Adrián Alacreu-Crespo, Julio A Guija, Ana Sánchez, Santiago de León, Enrique Baca-García, Lucas Giner\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impulsivity and aggression are known risk factors for suicide, with observed age and sex differences in their impact.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore variations in impulsivity and aggression based on sex and age and examine their roles in predicting suicide.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We examined 582 participants (406 individuals who died by suicide, 176 non-suicidal sudden-death controls) using the psychological autopsy method. Measures of impulsivity and aggression included the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and the Brown-Goodwin History of Aggression (BGHA). Participants were categorised into four groups: suicide male, control male, suicide female and control female. For group comparisons, we used analyses of variance and Spearman's rank correlation to assess the relationship between age and BIS and/or BGHA ratings. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of suicide for each sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher levels of BIS and BGHA ratings were found in the suicide group compared with controls (BIS: 51.3 <i>v</i>. 42.2, <i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.017; BGHA: 7.1 <i>v</i>. 4.1, <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.028), with no significant sex differences. BIS and BGHA ratings decreased with age in the suicide groups (suicide male: impulsivity <i>ρ</i> = -0.327, <i>P</i> < 0.001; suicide female: aggression <i>ρ</i> = -0.175, <i>P</i> = 0.038) but not among controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for men, aggression (odds ratio 1.072, 95% CI: 1.032-1.112) was a key predictor. For women, younger age (odds ratio 0.970, 95% CI: 0.948-0.993), low BIS impulsivity ratings (odds ratio 1.018, 95% CI: 1.001-1.036) and living with children (odds ratio 0.448, 95% CI: 0.208-0.966) were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Impulsive and aggressive behaviours are critical factors in suicide risk among younger individuals, indicating an age effect but no sex dimorphism, with aggressive behaviours being a better predictor for men and impulsive and aggressive behaviours for women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344428/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冲动和攻击性是已知的自杀风险因素,其影响存在年龄和性别差异。目的:探讨冲动性和攻击性在性别和年龄上的差异,并研究其在预测自杀中的作用。方法:采用心理解剖方法对582名参与者(406名自杀死亡,176名非自杀性猝死对照组)进行了调查。冲动性和攻击性的测量包括Barratt冲动性量表(BIS)和Brown-Goodwin攻击史量表(BGHA)。参与者被分为四组:自杀男性、对照组男性、自杀女性和对照组女性。对于组比较,我们使用方差分析和Spearman等级相关性来评估年龄与BIS和/或BGHA评分之间的关系。逐步逻辑回归用于确定各性别自杀的预测因素。结果:自杀组BIS和BGHA评分高于对照组(BIS: 51.3 vs . 42.2, P = 0.002, η = 0.017;BGHA: 7.1 vs . 4.1, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.028),性别差异不显著。自杀组BIS和BGHA评分随年龄下降(自杀男性:冲动性ρ = -0.327, P < 0.001;自杀女性:攻击性ρ = -0.175, P = 0.038),但在对照组中没有。Logistic回归分析显示,对于男性,攻击性(优势比1.072,95% CI: 1.032-1.112)是关键预测因子。对于女性来说,年龄较小(优势比0.970,95% CI: 0.948-0.993)、BIS冲动性评分较低(优势比1.018,95% CI: 1.001-1.036)和与儿童一起生活(优势比0.448,95% CI: 0.208-0.966)是保护因素。结论:冲动和攻击行为是年轻人自杀风险的关键因素,表明有年龄效应,但没有性别二态性,攻击行为是男性和女性更好的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impulsivity and aggression in suicide across age and sex: case-control study.

Background: Impulsivity and aggression are known risk factors for suicide, with observed age and sex differences in their impact.

Aims: To explore variations in impulsivity and aggression based on sex and age and examine their roles in predicting suicide.

Method: We examined 582 participants (406 individuals who died by suicide, 176 non-suicidal sudden-death controls) using the psychological autopsy method. Measures of impulsivity and aggression included the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and the Brown-Goodwin History of Aggression (BGHA). Participants were categorised into four groups: suicide male, control male, suicide female and control female. For group comparisons, we used analyses of variance and Spearman's rank correlation to assess the relationship between age and BIS and/or BGHA ratings. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify predictors of suicide for each sex.

Results: Higher levels of BIS and BGHA ratings were found in the suicide group compared with controls (BIS: 51.3 v. 42.2, P = 0.002, η2 = 0.017; BGHA: 7.1 v. 4.1, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.028), with no significant sex differences. BIS and BGHA ratings decreased with age in the suicide groups (suicide male: impulsivity ρ = -0.327, P < 0.001; suicide female: aggression ρ = -0.175, P = 0.038) but not among controls. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for men, aggression (odds ratio 1.072, 95% CI: 1.032-1.112) was a key predictor. For women, younger age (odds ratio 0.970, 95% CI: 0.948-0.993), low BIS impulsivity ratings (odds ratio 1.018, 95% CI: 1.001-1.036) and living with children (odds ratio 0.448, 95% CI: 0.208-0.966) were protective factors.

Conclusions: Impulsive and aggressive behaviours are critical factors in suicide risk among younger individuals, indicating an age effect but no sex dimorphism, with aggressive behaviours being a better predictor for men and impulsive and aggressive behaviours for women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信