{"title":"日本动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者对注射降脂疗法的偏好:来自日本横断面研究的结果","authors":"Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (<i>n</i> = 110) or secondary (<i>n</i> = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 10","pages":"4933 - 4949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for Injectable Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Findings from a Japanese Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (<i>n</i> = 110) or secondary (<i>n</i> = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 10\",\"pages\":\"4933 - 4949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preferences for Injectable Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Findings from a Japanese Cross-sectional Study
Introduction
Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (n = 110) or secondary (n = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.
Results
In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).
Conclusion
These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.