日本动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者对注射降脂疗法的偏好:来自日本横断面研究的结果

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mitsutoshi Toda, Kazuma Iekushi, Yuri Takahashi, Shun Kohsaka
{"title":"日本动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者对注射降脂疗法的偏好:来自日本横断面研究的结果","authors":"Mitsutoshi Toda,&nbsp;Kazuma Iekushi,&nbsp;Yuri Takahashi,&nbsp;Shun Kohsaka","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (<i>n</i> = 110) or secondary (<i>n</i> = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 10","pages":"4933 - 4949"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for Injectable Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Findings from a Japanese Cross-sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Mitsutoshi Toda,&nbsp;Kazuma Iekushi,&nbsp;Yuri Takahashi,&nbsp;Shun Kohsaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (<i>n</i> = 110) or secondary (<i>n</i> = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\"42 10\",\"pages\":\"4933 - 4949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-025-03321-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:了解患者对注射降脂疗法(LLTs)的偏好对于优化依从性和预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ascvd)的结果至关重要。本研究旨在量化日本ascvd患者对可注射llt的偏好。方法:本研究于2024年1 - 2月采用在线离散选择实验进行横断面研究。参与者是从Rakuten Insight疾病小组招募的。共有59,611人参与了这项调查,包括年龄≥18岁、有血脂异常病史且目前正在接受他汀类药物治疗的符合条件的成年人。参与者根据冠状动脉疾病或脑梗死史分为一级(n = 110)或二级(n = 415)预防组。结果:在二级预防组中,自付费用是最重要的属性(相对重要性为64.2%),其次是注射频率(18.4%)、给药方式(12.1%)和疗效(5.2%)。在各个子组中观察到一致的属性排名。在一级预防组中,自付费用仍然是最关键的属性(66.7%),其次是注射频率(19.5%)、疗效(7.0%)和给药方法(6.8%)。教育干预后,二级预防组最重要的因素是自费费用(59.6%),其次是注射频率(19.2%)、给药方式(11.8%)和疗效(9.4%)。结论:这些发现强调了在选择llt时,在共同决策时考虑患者偏好以提高依从性和临床结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences for Injectable Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Japanese Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Findings from a Japanese Cross-sectional Study

Introduction

Understanding patient preferences for injectable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is crucial for optimizing adherence and outcomes for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). This study aimed to quantify patient preferences for injectable LLTs among Japanese patients with ASCVDs.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to February 2024 using an online discrete choice experiment. Participants were recruited from the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. A total of 59,611 individuals accessed the survey, and eligible adults aged ≥ 18 years with a history of dyslipidemia and currently receiving statin treatment were included. Participants were categorized into primary (n = 110) or secondary (n = 415) prevention groups based on their history of coronary artery disease or cerebral infarction.

Results

In the secondary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs was the most significant attribute (relative importance, 64.2%), followed by injection frequency (18.4%), administration method (12.1%), and efficacy (5.2%). Consistent attribute rankings were observed across subgroups. In the primary prevention group, out-of-pocket costs remained the most critical attribute (66.7%), followed by injection frequency (19.5%), efficacy (7.0%), and administration method (6.8%). After educational intervention, out-of-pocket costs remained the most important attribute (59.6%) in the secondary prevention group, followed by injection frequency (19.2%), administration method (11.8%), and efficacy (9.4%).

Conclusion

These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in shared decision-making when selecting LLTs to enhance adherence and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信