环境政策与企业绿色创新:惩罚、税收和补贴在中国的作用。

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126730
Shuxia Zhang, Mengxuan Jin, Mingxiu Xie, Liping Xu
{"title":"环境政策与企业绿色创新:惩罚、税收和补贴在中国的作用。","authors":"Shuxia Zhang, Mengxuan Jin, Mingxiu Xie, Liping Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental penalties (EP), environmental protection taxes (ET), and environmental subsidies (ES) are key components of China's environmental regulatory framework, yet their combined and individual effects on corporate green innovation (CGI) remain poorly understood. This study investigates the direct and interactive effects of these policy instruments using panel data from A-share listed firms between 2008 and 2021. We find that: (1) ET and ES significantly stimulate both substantive and strategic green innovation, while EP has a counterproductive effect on substantive innovation; (2) EP exacerbates corporate financing constraints, ET promotes environmental investments, and ES strengthens internal green governance practices, each influencing innovation outcomes differently; (3) There is a substitution effect between EP and ET, while no significant interaction is observed between other policy pairs; (4) Heterogeneity tests show that technology-intensive firms are more responsive to ET and ES, while non-technology-intensive firms are more sensitive to EP. Our results provide actionable insights for policymakers on balancing environmental regulations to promote both ecological sustainability and corporate green competitiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"392 ","pages":"126730"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental policy and corporate green innovation: The role of penalties, taxes, and subsidies in China.\",\"authors\":\"Shuxia Zhang, Mengxuan Jin, Mingxiu Xie, Liping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Environmental penalties (EP), environmental protection taxes (ET), and environmental subsidies (ES) are key components of China's environmental regulatory framework, yet their combined and individual effects on corporate green innovation (CGI) remain poorly understood. This study investigates the direct and interactive effects of these policy instruments using panel data from A-share listed firms between 2008 and 2021. We find that: (1) ET and ES significantly stimulate both substantive and strategic green innovation, while EP has a counterproductive effect on substantive innovation; (2) EP exacerbates corporate financing constraints, ET promotes environmental investments, and ES strengthens internal green governance practices, each influencing innovation outcomes differently; (3) There is a substitution effect between EP and ET, while no significant interaction is observed between other policy pairs; (4) Heterogeneity tests show that technology-intensive firms are more responsive to ET and ES, while non-technology-intensive firms are more sensitive to EP. Our results provide actionable insights for policymakers on balancing environmental regulations to promote both ecological sustainability and corporate green competitiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"392 \",\"pages\":\"126730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126730\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境处罚(EP)、环境保护税(ET)和环境补贴(ES)是中国环境监管框架的关键组成部分,但它们对企业绿色创新(CGI)的综合和个别影响尚不清楚。本研究利用2008年至2021年a股上市公司的面板数据,考察了这些政策工具的直接和互动效应。研究发现:(1)排放效率和环境效益对实质性和战略性绿色创新均有显著的促进作用,而环境效益对实质性创新有反生产作用;(2)环境效益加剧了企业融资约束,环境效益促进了环境投资,环境效益强化了内部绿色治理实践,对创新成果的影响各不相同;(3) EP与ET之间存在替代效应,其他政策对之间不存在显著交互作用;(4)异质性检验表明,技术密集型企业对环境绩效和环境绩效更敏感,而非技术密集型企业对环境绩效更敏感。我们的研究结果为决策者平衡环境法规以促进生态可持续性和企业绿色竞争力提供了可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental policy and corporate green innovation: The role of penalties, taxes, and subsidies in China.

Environmental penalties (EP), environmental protection taxes (ET), and environmental subsidies (ES) are key components of China's environmental regulatory framework, yet their combined and individual effects on corporate green innovation (CGI) remain poorly understood. This study investigates the direct and interactive effects of these policy instruments using panel data from A-share listed firms between 2008 and 2021. We find that: (1) ET and ES significantly stimulate both substantive and strategic green innovation, while EP has a counterproductive effect on substantive innovation; (2) EP exacerbates corporate financing constraints, ET promotes environmental investments, and ES strengthens internal green governance practices, each influencing innovation outcomes differently; (3) There is a substitution effect between EP and ET, while no significant interaction is observed between other policy pairs; (4) Heterogeneity tests show that technology-intensive firms are more responsive to ET and ES, while non-technology-intensive firms are more sensitive to EP. Our results provide actionable insights for policymakers on balancing environmental regulations to promote both ecological sustainability and corporate green competitiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信