单菌种和菌群发酵巴沙鱼废弃物的宏观物理特性、营养成分及其饲料潜力

IF 4.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Abun Abun, Kiki Haetami, Denny Rusmana, Rahmad Fany Ramdhan
{"title":"单菌种和菌群发酵巴沙鱼废弃物的宏观物理特性、营养成分及其饲料潜力","authors":"Abun Abun,&nbsp;Kiki Haetami,&nbsp;Denny Rusmana,&nbsp;Rahmad Fany Ramdhan","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fish waste processing through biological technology using fermentation microbes is an important concern in handling fishery waste, because fermentation can decompose organic waste materials into useful products and reduce pollutant levels. The purpose of the study was to select three types of microbes based on macroscopic properties and nutrient content of fermented pangasius waste (FPW). In the first stage, the fermentation of pangasius waste with eight species of microbes (three of bacteria, three of fungi, and two of yeast) is cultured in a single fermentation solid-state medium. Each type of microbe that produces the highest number of colonies and nutrient content of FPW products in a single culture is then selected and used for consortium culture. The study used the nested, completely randomized design method, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results of single cultures of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (Pa), <i>Rhizopus microsporus</i> (Rm), and <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> (Yl) produced the best FPW products at 4 days of fermentation. The results of a consortium <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, <i>R. microsporus</i>, and <i>Y. lipolytica</i> (Pa + Rm + Yl) at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days produced the best macroscopic physical properties, and its effect on nutrient content, obtained at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days (protein 52.02%, fat 29.24%, and crude fiber 2.19%). The conclusion was that the consortium of three types of microbes (Pa + Rm + Yl) was more effective in treating FPW. FPW products are recommended as feed ingredients as a source of protein for poultry.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroscopic Physical Properties and Nutrient Content in the Fermentation of Pangasius Waste by Single Cultures and Microbial Consortiums and Their Potential for Feed\",\"authors\":\"Abun Abun,&nbsp;Kiki Haetami,&nbsp;Denny Rusmana,&nbsp;Rahmad Fany Ramdhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mbo3.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fish waste processing through biological technology using fermentation microbes is an important concern in handling fishery waste, because fermentation can decompose organic waste materials into useful products and reduce pollutant levels. The purpose of the study was to select three types of microbes based on macroscopic properties and nutrient content of fermented pangasius waste (FPW). In the first stage, the fermentation of pangasius waste with eight species of microbes (three of bacteria, three of fungi, and two of yeast) is cultured in a single fermentation solid-state medium. Each type of microbe that produces the highest number of colonies and nutrient content of FPW products in a single culture is then selected and used for consortium culture. The study used the nested, completely randomized design method, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results of single cultures of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (Pa), <i>Rhizopus microsporus</i> (Rm), and <i>Yarrowia lipolytica</i> (Yl) produced the best FPW products at 4 days of fermentation. The results of a consortium <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, <i>R. microsporus</i>, and <i>Y. lipolytica</i> (Pa + Rm + Yl) at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days produced the best macroscopic physical properties, and its effect on nutrient content, obtained at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days (protein 52.02%, fat 29.24%, and crude fiber 2.19%). The conclusion was that the consortium of three types of microbes (Pa + Rm + Yl) was more effective in treating FPW. FPW products are recommended as feed ingredients as a source of protein for poultry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MicrobiologyOpen\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70040\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MicrobiologyOpen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用发酵微生物的生物技术处理鱼类废物是处理渔业废物的一个重要问题,因为发酵可以将有机废物分解成有用的产品并降低污染物水平。研究的目的是根据发酵巴沙鱼废物(FPW)的宏观特性和营养成分选择三种微生物。在第一阶段,用8种微生物(3种细菌、3种真菌和2种酵母)在单一发酵固体培养基中培养巴沙鱼废物。然后选择在单一培养中产生最多菌落和FPW产品营养含量的每种微生物进行联合培养。本研究采用嵌套式完全随机设计方法,采用方差分析和Duncan多元极差检验对数据进行分析。结果表明,铜绿假单胞菌(Pa)、小孢子根霉(Rm)和多脂耶氏菌(Yl)在发酵第4天产生最佳的FPW产品。结果表明,铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)、小孢子假单胞菌(R. microsporus)和多脂假单胞菌(Y. lipolytica, Pa + Rm + Yl)组合在15%的剂量下发酵4 d,产生了最佳的宏观物理特性,其对营养成分含量的影响在15%的剂量下发酵4 d(蛋白质52.02%,脂肪29.24%,粗纤维2.19%)。结果表明,Pa + Rm + Yl三种微生物联合治疗FPW效果较好。FPW产品被推荐作为家禽蛋白质来源的饲料成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Macroscopic Physical Properties and Nutrient Content in the Fermentation of Pangasius Waste by Single Cultures and Microbial Consortiums and Their Potential for Feed

Macroscopic Physical Properties and Nutrient Content in the Fermentation of Pangasius Waste by Single Cultures and Microbial Consortiums and Their Potential for Feed

Fish waste processing through biological technology using fermentation microbes is an important concern in handling fishery waste, because fermentation can decompose organic waste materials into useful products and reduce pollutant levels. The purpose of the study was to select three types of microbes based on macroscopic properties and nutrient content of fermented pangasius waste (FPW). In the first stage, the fermentation of pangasius waste with eight species of microbes (three of bacteria, three of fungi, and two of yeast) is cultured in a single fermentation solid-state medium. Each type of microbe that produces the highest number of colonies and nutrient content of FPW products in a single culture is then selected and used for consortium culture. The study used the nested, completely randomized design method, and the data were analyzed with ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results of single cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa), Rhizopus microsporus (Rm), and Yarrowia lipolytica (Yl) produced the best FPW products at 4 days of fermentation. The results of a consortium P. aeruginosa, R. microsporus, and Y. lipolytica (Pa + Rm + Yl) at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days produced the best macroscopic physical properties, and its effect on nutrient content, obtained at a dose of 15% and fermentation for 4 days (protein 52.02%, fat 29.24%, and crude fiber 2.19%). The conclusion was that the consortium of three types of microbes (Pa + Rm + Yl) was more effective in treating FPW. FPW products are recommended as feed ingredients as a source of protein for poultry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信