李斯特菌标记用亲脂荧光探针的合成与评价及其对生物膜形成的影响

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Nika Janež , Márta Ladányi , Nika Zaveršek , Petra Čotar , Aleksandar Sebastijanović , Janez Štrancar , Jerica Sabotič , Stane Pajk
{"title":"李斯特菌标记用亲脂荧光探针的合成与评价及其对生物膜形成的影响","authors":"Nika Janež ,&nbsp;Márta Ladányi ,&nbsp;Nika Zaveršek ,&nbsp;Petra Čotar ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Sebastijanović ,&nbsp;Janez Štrancar ,&nbsp;Jerica Sabotič ,&nbsp;Stane Pajk","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Imaging bacterial biofilms using confocal fluorescence microscopy is used to study their structures, but its wider application is constrained by the limited availability of effective labelling tools. Small chemical fluorescent probes offer a versatile alternative to heterologous expression of fusion or reporter proteins, but data on their effects on biofilm formation are lacking. In this study, we synthesized a series of new lipophilic fluorescent probes based on Nile blue, Nile red and coumarin scaffold. We investigated them for the labelling of <em>Listeria</em> biofilms and determined their effects on the growth and biofilm biomass formation. The Nile red probe <strong>SP-AM 7</strong> and the coumarin probe <strong>PAG 31</strong> inhibited biofilm development and showed a strong bactericidal effect. The Nile blue probe <strong>PAG 19</strong> had the least effect on the tested parameters, but labelled slowly, while the fast-labelling Nile red probe <strong>SP-AM 8</strong> promoted biofilm formation. Both are suitable for use during biofilm growth, resulting in less variation in biomass-related measurements than probes added prior to imaging. In the 3D imaging-based measurements for selected probes, we found no difference in the total biomass formed compared to the control dye, but a redistribution of biomass in the 3D layers was observed. Other probes were found to be slow to label, leave traces of unused probes or interfere with attachment to the surface. Our results show that fluorescent probe labelling should be evaluated from chemical, physical and biological points of view to understand their reliability and credibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107206"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesis and evaluation of lipophilic fluorescent probes for the labelling of Listeria and their impact on biofilm formation\",\"authors\":\"Nika Janež ,&nbsp;Márta Ladányi ,&nbsp;Nika Zaveršek ,&nbsp;Petra Čotar ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Sebastijanović ,&nbsp;Janez Štrancar ,&nbsp;Jerica Sabotič ,&nbsp;Stane Pajk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Imaging bacterial biofilms using confocal fluorescence microscopy is used to study their structures, but its wider application is constrained by the limited availability of effective labelling tools. Small chemical fluorescent probes offer a versatile alternative to heterologous expression of fusion or reporter proteins, but data on their effects on biofilm formation are lacking. In this study, we synthesized a series of new lipophilic fluorescent probes based on Nile blue, Nile red and coumarin scaffold. We investigated them for the labelling of <em>Listeria</em> biofilms and determined their effects on the growth and biofilm biomass formation. The Nile red probe <strong>SP-AM 7</strong> and the coumarin probe <strong>PAG 31</strong> inhibited biofilm development and showed a strong bactericidal effect. The Nile blue probe <strong>PAG 19</strong> had the least effect on the tested parameters, but labelled slowly, while the fast-labelling Nile red probe <strong>SP-AM 8</strong> promoted biofilm formation. Both are suitable for use during biofilm growth, resulting in less variation in biomass-related measurements than probes added prior to imaging. In the 3D imaging-based measurements for selected probes, we found no difference in the total biomass formed compared to the control dye, but a redistribution of biomass in the 3D layers was observed. Other probes were found to be slow to label, leave traces of unused probes or interfere with attachment to the surface. Our results show that fluorescent probe labelling should be evaluated from chemical, physical and biological points of view to understand their reliability and credibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用共聚焦荧光显微镜成像细菌生物膜用于研究其结构,但其更广泛的应用受到有效标记工具的有限可用性的限制。小型化学荧光探针提供了一种多用途的替代异种表达融合或报告蛋白,但其对生物膜形成的影响的数据缺乏。本研究以尼罗蓝、尼罗红和香豆素为骨架,合成了一系列新的亲脂性荧光探针。研究了它们对李斯特菌生物膜的标记作用,并确定了它们对李斯特菌生长和生物膜生物量形成的影响。尼罗红探针SP-AM 7和香豆素探针PAG 31抑制了生物膜的发育,并表现出较强的杀菌作用。尼罗河蓝探针PAG 19对被测参数影响最小,但标记速度慢,而快速标记的尼罗河红探针SP-AM 8促进生物膜的形成。两者都适合在生物膜生长过程中使用,与成像前添加的探针相比,生物量相关测量的变化更小。在对选定探针进行的基于3D成像的测量中,我们发现与对照染料相比,形成的总生物量没有差异,但在3D层中观察到生物量的重新分布。其他探针被发现标记缓慢,留下未使用探针的痕迹或干扰附着在表面。我们的研究结果表明,荧光探针标记应该从化学、物理和生物学的角度进行评估,以了解其可靠性和可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synthesis and evaluation of lipophilic fluorescent probes for the labelling of Listeria and their impact on biofilm formation
Imaging bacterial biofilms using confocal fluorescence microscopy is used to study their structures, but its wider application is constrained by the limited availability of effective labelling tools. Small chemical fluorescent probes offer a versatile alternative to heterologous expression of fusion or reporter proteins, but data on their effects on biofilm formation are lacking. In this study, we synthesized a series of new lipophilic fluorescent probes based on Nile blue, Nile red and coumarin scaffold. We investigated them for the labelling of Listeria biofilms and determined their effects on the growth and biofilm biomass formation. The Nile red probe SP-AM 7 and the coumarin probe PAG 31 inhibited biofilm development and showed a strong bactericidal effect. The Nile blue probe PAG 19 had the least effect on the tested parameters, but labelled slowly, while the fast-labelling Nile red probe SP-AM 8 promoted biofilm formation. Both are suitable for use during biofilm growth, resulting in less variation in biomass-related measurements than probes added prior to imaging. In the 3D imaging-based measurements for selected probes, we found no difference in the total biomass formed compared to the control dye, but a redistribution of biomass in the 3D layers was observed. Other probes were found to be slow to label, leave traces of unused probes or interfere with attachment to the surface. Our results show that fluorescent probe labelling should be evaluated from chemical, physical and biological points of view to understand their reliability and credibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信