Quang-Tuan Bui , Liane A. Haufe , Jianfeng Zhang , Marco Wenzel , Tom Kremer , Juan Luis Gómez Urbano , Andrea Balducci , Hao Du , Jan J. Weigand
{"title":"废LiFePO4正极材料回收与再合成的封闭工艺","authors":"Quang-Tuan Bui , Liane A. Haufe , Jianfeng Zhang , Marco Wenzel , Tom Kremer , Juan Luis Gómez Urbano , Andrea Balducci , Hao Du , Jan J. Weigand","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Complete material recycling is essential for a sustainable future. Herein, we report on the re-synthesis of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C from spent lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathode powder. After oxidative treatment of the spent LFP powder at 550 °C, the resulting material was dissolved quantitatively (99 %) in 60 wt.% H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>. Reactive oxygen microbubbles were employed to oxidize residual Fe(II) to Fe(III), before the recovery as FePO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O via hydrothermal synthesis. The H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was recovered from the mother liquor through solvent extraction using cyclohexanol, tributyl phosphate, and Escaid 110 as the organic phase. After water stripping and up-concentration, the recovered H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was used in subsequent cycles for treating spent LFP cathode powder. Lithium was recovered from the raffinate as Li<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and successfully used with the recovered FePO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O for the solid-state re-synthesis of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C. The re-synthesized LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C displayed the characteristic LFP two-phase transformation mechanism and excellent stability upon long-term cycling (94 % retention after 200 cycles at 1 C).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108519"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closed process for recycling and re-synthesis of spent LiFePO4 cathode material\",\"authors\":\"Quang-Tuan Bui , Liane A. Haufe , Jianfeng Zhang , Marco Wenzel , Tom Kremer , Juan Luis Gómez Urbano , Andrea Balducci , Hao Du , Jan J. Weigand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Complete material recycling is essential for a sustainable future. Herein, we report on the re-synthesis of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C from spent lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathode powder. After oxidative treatment of the spent LFP powder at 550 °C, the resulting material was dissolved quantitatively (99 %) in 60 wt.% H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>. Reactive oxygen microbubbles were employed to oxidize residual Fe(II) to Fe(III), before the recovery as FePO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O via hydrothermal synthesis. The H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was recovered from the mother liquor through solvent extraction using cyclohexanol, tributyl phosphate, and Escaid 110 as the organic phase. After water stripping and up-concentration, the recovered H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was used in subsequent cycles for treating spent LFP cathode powder. Lithium was recovered from the raffinate as Li<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and successfully used with the recovered FePO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O for the solid-state re-synthesis of LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C. The re-synthesized LiFePO<sub>4</sub>/C displayed the characteristic LFP two-phase transformation mechanism and excellent stability upon long-term cycling (94 % retention after 200 cycles at 1 C).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"223 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003970\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A closed process for recycling and re-synthesis of spent LiFePO4 cathode material
Complete material recycling is essential for a sustainable future. Herein, we report on the re-synthesis of LiFePO4/C from spent lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathode powder. After oxidative treatment of the spent LFP powder at 550 °C, the resulting material was dissolved quantitatively (99 %) in 60 wt.% H3PO4. Reactive oxygen microbubbles were employed to oxidize residual Fe(II) to Fe(III), before the recovery as FePO4·2H2O via hydrothermal synthesis. The H3PO4 was recovered from the mother liquor through solvent extraction using cyclohexanol, tributyl phosphate, and Escaid 110 as the organic phase. After water stripping and up-concentration, the recovered H3PO4 was used in subsequent cycles for treating spent LFP cathode powder. Lithium was recovered from the raffinate as Li3PO4 and successfully used with the recovered FePO4·2H2O for the solid-state re-synthesis of LiFePO4/C. The re-synthesized LiFePO4/C displayed the characteristic LFP two-phase transformation mechanism and excellent stability upon long-term cycling (94 % retention after 200 cycles at 1 C).
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.