基于条件变分自编码器的视网膜神经纤维层厚度个性化估计

IF 4.6 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ou Tan PhD , Keke Liu MD , Aiyin Chen MD , Dongseok Choi PhD , Jonathan C.H. Chan MD , Bonnie N.K. Choy MD , Kendrick C. Shih MD , Jasper K.W. Wong MD , Alex L.K. Ng MD , Janice J.C. Cheung MD , Michael Y. Ni MD , Jimmy S.M. Lai MD , Gabriel M. Leung MD , Ian Y.H. Wong MD , David Huang MD, PhD
{"title":"基于条件变分自编码器的视网膜神经纤维层厚度个性化估计","authors":"Ou Tan PhD ,&nbsp;Keke Liu MD ,&nbsp;Aiyin Chen MD ,&nbsp;Dongseok Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan C.H. Chan MD ,&nbsp;Bonnie N.K. Choy MD ,&nbsp;Kendrick C. Shih MD ,&nbsp;Jasper K.W. Wong MD ,&nbsp;Alex L.K. Ng MD ,&nbsp;Janice J.C. Cheung MD ,&nbsp;Michael Y. Ni MD ,&nbsp;Jimmy S.M. Lai MD ,&nbsp;Gabriel M. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Ian Y.H. Wong MD ,&nbsp;David Huang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Use generative deep learning (DL) models to estimate baseline reference nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT) profiles, taking into account individual ocular characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Six hundred eighty-six individuals from the Hong Kong FAMILY cohort and 75 individuals from the Casey Eye Institute (CEI) cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy eyes were selected from the Hong Kong FAMILY and CEI cohorts. Circumpapillary NFLT profiles and vascular patterns were measured by a spectral-domain OCT. Generative DL models were trained using the FAMILY data to reconstruct the individualized baseline NFLT, a customized normal reference based on each eye’s own vascular pattern, axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, disc size, and demographic information. Two DL models were developed. The MAG model used actual AL and SE, while the REG model estimated AL and SE using vascular patterns as input. For comparison, a multiple linear regression (MLR) was trained to estimate baseline NFLT using AL and demographic information. Fivefold cross-validation was used to assess performance.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The prediction error: root-mean-square of the difference between the actual NFLT profile and the predicted individualized baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1152 healthy eyes from 686 participants in the Hong Kong Family cohort were divided into 4 subgroups: high myopia (SE &lt;−6 diopters [D]), low myopia (SE = −6 D ∼ −1 D), emmetropia (SE = −1D∼1D), and hyperopia (SE &gt;1D). Compared with the population means, both DL models significantly reduced the prediction error for overall and quadrant NFLT and decreased the false-positive rate of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning in both myopia groups (from 13.0%-27.0% to 6.3%∼9.4%). Both DL models significantly reduced prediction error for the NFLT profiles compared with both the population mean and the MLR-adjusted NFLT. The reductions in prediction errors for NFLT profile and overall NFLT value were independently validated using the CEI data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Generative DL models (a type of artificial intelligence) can construct individualized NFLT baseline profiles using the vascular pattern derived from the same OCT scans. The individualized baseline reduced the prediction error of the NFLT profile in healthy eyes and may improve the accuracy of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning, especially in myopic eyes.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 6","pages":"Article 100849"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized Estimation of Baseline Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using Conditional Variational Autoencoder\",\"authors\":\"Ou Tan PhD ,&nbsp;Keke Liu MD ,&nbsp;Aiyin Chen MD ,&nbsp;Dongseok Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Jonathan C.H. Chan MD ,&nbsp;Bonnie N.K. Choy MD ,&nbsp;Kendrick C. Shih MD ,&nbsp;Jasper K.W. Wong MD ,&nbsp;Alex L.K. Ng MD ,&nbsp;Janice J.C. Cheung MD ,&nbsp;Michael Y. Ni MD ,&nbsp;Jimmy S.M. Lai MD ,&nbsp;Gabriel M. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Ian Y.H. Wong MD ,&nbsp;David Huang MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Use generative deep learning (DL) models to estimate baseline reference nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT) profiles, taking into account individual ocular characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Six hundred eighty-six individuals from the Hong Kong FAMILY cohort and 75 individuals from the Casey Eye Institute (CEI) cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Healthy eyes were selected from the Hong Kong FAMILY and CEI cohorts. Circumpapillary NFLT profiles and vascular patterns were measured by a spectral-domain OCT. Generative DL models were trained using the FAMILY data to reconstruct the individualized baseline NFLT, a customized normal reference based on each eye’s own vascular pattern, axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, disc size, and demographic information. Two DL models were developed. The MAG model used actual AL and SE, while the REG model estimated AL and SE using vascular patterns as input. For comparison, a multiple linear regression (MLR) was trained to estimate baseline NFLT using AL and demographic information. Fivefold cross-validation was used to assess performance.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The prediction error: root-mean-square of the difference between the actual NFLT profile and the predicted individualized baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1152 healthy eyes from 686 participants in the Hong Kong Family cohort were divided into 4 subgroups: high myopia (SE &lt;−6 diopters [D]), low myopia (SE = −6 D ∼ −1 D), emmetropia (SE = −1D∼1D), and hyperopia (SE &gt;1D). Compared with the population means, both DL models significantly reduced the prediction error for overall and quadrant NFLT and decreased the false-positive rate of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning in both myopia groups (from 13.0%-27.0% to 6.3%∼9.4%). Both DL models significantly reduced prediction error for the NFLT profiles compared with both the population mean and the MLR-adjusted NFLT. The reductions in prediction errors for NFLT profile and overall NFLT value were independently validated using the CEI data.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Generative DL models (a type of artificial intelligence) can construct individualized NFLT baseline profiles using the vascular pattern derived from the same OCT scans. The individualized baseline reduced the prediction error of the NFLT profile in healthy eyes and may improve the accuracy of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning, especially in myopic eyes.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525001472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525001472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的利用生成式深度学习(DL)模型估计基线参考神经纤维层厚度(NFLT)剖面,同时考虑个体眼部特征。设计横断面研究。参与者:来自香港家庭队列的686名个体和来自凯西眼科研究所(CEI)队列的75名个体。方法从香港FAMILY和CEI队列中选择健康的眼睛。通过光谱域oct测量乳头周围NFLT轮廓和血管模式,使用FAMILY数据训练生成DL模型来重建个性化基线NFLT,这是基于每只眼睛自身血管模式、轴向长度(AL)、球面等效屈光误差(SE)、椎间盘大小和人口统计信息的定制正常参考。开发了两个深度学习模型。MAG模型使用实际AL和SE,而REG模型使用血管模式作为输入来估计AL和SE。为了进行比较,训练多元线性回归(MLR)来使用AL和人口统计信息估计基线NFLT。使用五重交叉验证来评估性能。预测误差:实际NFLT概况与预测个体化基线之间差异的均方根。结果来自香港家庭队列686名参与者的1152只健康眼睛被分为4个亚组:高度近视(SE <;−6屈光度[D])、低近视(SE =−6 D ~−1D)、远视(SE =−1D ~ 1D)和远视(SE >1D)。与总体均值相比,两种DL模型都显著降低了整体和象限NFLT的预测误差,并降低了两组近视中识别NFLT异常变薄的假阳性率(从13.0%-27.0%降至6.3% ~ 9.4%)。与总体均值和mlr校正的NFLT相比,两种DL模型都显著降低了NFLT剖面的预测误差。使用CEI数据独立验证了NFLT剖面和总体NFLT值预测误差的降低。结论生成DL模型(一种人工智能)可以利用相同OCT扫描得出的血管模式构建个性化的NFLT基线剖面。个性化基线降低了健康眼睛NFLT轮廓的预测误差,并可能提高识别异常NFLT变薄的准确性,特别是在近视眼睛中。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized Estimation of Baseline Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using Conditional Variational Autoencoder

Purpose

Use generative deep learning (DL) models to estimate baseline reference nerve fiber layer thickness (NFLT) profiles, taking into account individual ocular characteristics.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Participants

Six hundred eighty-six individuals from the Hong Kong FAMILY cohort and 75 individuals from the Casey Eye Institute (CEI) cohort.

Methods

Healthy eyes were selected from the Hong Kong FAMILY and CEI cohorts. Circumpapillary NFLT profiles and vascular patterns were measured by a spectral-domain OCT. Generative DL models were trained using the FAMILY data to reconstruct the individualized baseline NFLT, a customized normal reference based on each eye’s own vascular pattern, axial length (AL), spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error, disc size, and demographic information. Two DL models were developed. The MAG model used actual AL and SE, while the REG model estimated AL and SE using vascular patterns as input. For comparison, a multiple linear regression (MLR) was trained to estimate baseline NFLT using AL and demographic information. Fivefold cross-validation was used to assess performance.

Main Outcome Measures

The prediction error: root-mean-square of the difference between the actual NFLT profile and the predicted individualized baseline.

Results

A total of 1152 healthy eyes from 686 participants in the Hong Kong Family cohort were divided into 4 subgroups: high myopia (SE <−6 diopters [D]), low myopia (SE = −6 D ∼ −1 D), emmetropia (SE = −1D∼1D), and hyperopia (SE >1D). Compared with the population means, both DL models significantly reduced the prediction error for overall and quadrant NFLT and decreased the false-positive rate of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning in both myopia groups (from 13.0%-27.0% to 6.3%∼9.4%). Both DL models significantly reduced prediction error for the NFLT profiles compared with both the population mean and the MLR-adjusted NFLT. The reductions in prediction errors for NFLT profile and overall NFLT value were independently validated using the CEI data.

Conclusions

Generative DL models (a type of artificial intelligence) can construct individualized NFLT baseline profiles using the vascular pattern derived from the same OCT scans. The individualized baseline reduced the prediction error of the NFLT profile in healthy eyes and may improve the accuracy of identifying abnormal NFLT thinning, especially in myopic eyes.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信