模拟罗马帝国时期Dressel 20双耳罐生产的文化演变过程

IF 2.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
María Coto-Sarmiento , Simon Carrignon
{"title":"模拟罗马帝国时期Dressel 20双耳罐生产的文化演变过程","authors":"María Coto-Sarmiento ,&nbsp;Simon Carrignon","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How people interact socially and transmit their knowledge from generation to generation leads to different habits and traditions. When these traditions are about pottery-making techniques, these differences may have left a quantifiable trace in the remaining cultural material. However, linking the differences observed in the archaeological record with social learning strategies and how production techniques were transmitted is extremely difficult. In archaeology, this has been studied in handmade production but barely analysed in large-scale production implying long-distance social interaction during an extended period. The goal of this study is to explore the transmission of technical skills among potters within the Roman Empire. Specifically, our case study has focused on the Dressel 20 amphora production processes based in <em>Baetica</em> province (currently Andalusia). To achieve this, we (1) compute the covariance matrix between morphometric measurements and use it to define the core rules of pottery-making techniques, (2) define scenarios in an Agent-based model that represent hypotheses about how techniques were shared between potters, and (3) quantify how likely each scenario is to reproduce the correlation between morphometric similarity of the pottery and the distance between the workshops observed empirically. Our analysis highlights that, while the spatial distribution of workshops influences social interaction among potters, it does not act as a strict barrier. Even workshops that are relatively distant can exhibit some morphometric similarities, suggesting that knowledge and techniques can be transmitted over larger distances. However, to obtain the level of correlation between distance in space and closeness in shape observed in the real world, geographical constraints – represented in our case by riverine connections – need to play a role in limiting interactions. Finally, we believe this method provides a versatile framework to explore morphometric differences related to the transmission processes in a large-scale production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling cultural evolution processes in Dressel 20 amphora production during the Roman Empire\",\"authors\":\"María Coto-Sarmiento ,&nbsp;Simon Carrignon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How people interact socially and transmit their knowledge from generation to generation leads to different habits and traditions. When these traditions are about pottery-making techniques, these differences may have left a quantifiable trace in the remaining cultural material. However, linking the differences observed in the archaeological record with social learning strategies and how production techniques were transmitted is extremely difficult. In archaeology, this has been studied in handmade production but barely analysed in large-scale production implying long-distance social interaction during an extended period. The goal of this study is to explore the transmission of technical skills among potters within the Roman Empire. Specifically, our case study has focused on the Dressel 20 amphora production processes based in <em>Baetica</em> province (currently Andalusia). To achieve this, we (1) compute the covariance matrix between morphometric measurements and use it to define the core rules of pottery-making techniques, (2) define scenarios in an Agent-based model that represent hypotheses about how techniques were shared between potters, and (3) quantify how likely each scenario is to reproduce the correlation between morphometric similarity of the pottery and the distance between the workshops observed empirically. Our analysis highlights that, while the spatial distribution of workshops influences social interaction among potters, it does not act as a strict barrier. Even workshops that are relatively distant can exhibit some morphometric similarities, suggesting that knowledge and techniques can be transmitted over larger distances. However, to obtain the level of correlation between distance in space and closeness in shape observed in the real world, geographical constraints – represented in our case by riverine connections – need to play a role in limiting interactions. Finally, we believe this method provides a versatile framework to explore morphometric differences related to the transmission processes in a large-scale production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325001657\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325001657","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们的社会交往和知识的代代相传导致了不同的习惯和传统。当这些传统与制陶技术有关时,这些差异可能在剩余的文化材料中留下了可量化的痕迹。然而,将考古记录中观察到的差异与社会学习策略以及生产技术如何传播联系起来是极其困难的。在考古学中,这已经在手工生产中进行了研究,但在大规模生产中几乎没有分析,这意味着在很长一段时间内长距离的社会互动。本研究的目的是探索技术技能的传播之间的陶工在罗马帝国。具体来说,我们的案例研究集中在Baetica省(现为安达卢西亚)的Dressel 20双耳罐生产过程。为了实现这一目标,我们(1)计算形态测量之间的协方差矩阵,并用它来定义制陶技术的核心规则;(2)在基于agent的模型中定义场景,该模型代表了陶工之间如何共享技术的假设;(3)量化每个场景再现陶器形态相似性与经验观察到的车间之间距离之间相关性的可能性。我们的分析强调,虽然车间的空间分布影响着陶工之间的社会互动,但它并没有成为严格的障碍。即使是相对较远的车间也可以表现出一些形态上的相似性,这表明知识和技术可以在更大的距离上传播。然而,为了获得在现实世界中观察到的空间距离和形状接近程度之间的相关性,地理限制——在我们的案例中以河流连接为代表——需要在限制相互作用方面发挥作用。最后,我们相信这种方法提供了一个通用的框架来探索与大规模生产中传输过程相关的形态测量差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling cultural evolution processes in Dressel 20 amphora production during the Roman Empire
How people interact socially and transmit their knowledge from generation to generation leads to different habits and traditions. When these traditions are about pottery-making techniques, these differences may have left a quantifiable trace in the remaining cultural material. However, linking the differences observed in the archaeological record with social learning strategies and how production techniques were transmitted is extremely difficult. In archaeology, this has been studied in handmade production but barely analysed in large-scale production implying long-distance social interaction during an extended period. The goal of this study is to explore the transmission of technical skills among potters within the Roman Empire. Specifically, our case study has focused on the Dressel 20 amphora production processes based in Baetica province (currently Andalusia). To achieve this, we (1) compute the covariance matrix between morphometric measurements and use it to define the core rules of pottery-making techniques, (2) define scenarios in an Agent-based model that represent hypotheses about how techniques were shared between potters, and (3) quantify how likely each scenario is to reproduce the correlation between morphometric similarity of the pottery and the distance between the workshops observed empirically. Our analysis highlights that, while the spatial distribution of workshops influences social interaction among potters, it does not act as a strict barrier. Even workshops that are relatively distant can exhibit some morphometric similarities, suggesting that knowledge and techniques can be transmitted over larger distances. However, to obtain the level of correlation between distance in space and closeness in shape observed in the real world, geographical constraints – represented in our case by riverine connections – need to play a role in limiting interactions. Finally, we believe this method provides a versatile framework to explore morphometric differences related to the transmission processes in a large-scale production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信