Chun‐Yan Zhou, Tao Jia, Tian‐Hao Su, Yun‐Hong Tan, Qiang Liu, Tao Wang, Yu‐Xuan Mo, Hai‐Xia Hu, Xiao‐Yan Pu, Xiao‐Fan Na, Su Li
{"title":"热带维管附生植物叶片和根系之间的组一致但种特有的氮同位素分异","authors":"Chun‐Yan Zhou, Tao Jia, Tian‐Hao Su, Yun‐Hong Tan, Qiang Liu, Tao Wang, Yu‐Xuan Mo, Hai‐Xia Hu, Xiao‐Yan Pu, Xiao‐Fan Na, Su Li","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Epiphytes are believed to exhibit minimal internal nitrogen (N) isotopic composition (δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N) variation due to severe N limitation in canopy habitats. However, the lack of empirical evidence leaves this question open, complicating the interpretation of foliar δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N in understanding the N economy of epiphytes.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, the variation in δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N between leaves and roots (∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf–root</jats:sub>) of 24 epiphyte species from the tropical Xishuangbanna region of southwest China was calculated. Subsequent linear regression and variance decomposition were performed to identify the underlying driving factors.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>A small ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> (+0.43‰) was observed in epiphytes, which exhibited relatively consistent values across groups (−0.20‰ to 1.78‰) but markedly species‐specific values (−2.13‰ to 2.15‰), independently of phylogeny, reflecting the combined effects of external N sources and N acquisition strategies of epiphytes. In particular, positive ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> values were primarily correlated with leaf N and root carbon (C), while negative ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> values were associated with leaf C isotopic composition (δ<jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C), indicating that distinct <jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N fractionation progresses were at work.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. These results demonstrate for the first time that ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> is minimal yet noteworthy within epiphytes compared with soil‐rooted plants, reflecting the more severe N stress in the canopy habitats, and suggest that foliar δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N—when accounting for <jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N fractionation—can provide valuable insights into the N dynamics of tropical epiphytes.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group‐consistent but species‐specific nitrogen isotope fractionation between leaves and roots in tropical vascular epiphytes\",\"authors\":\"Chun‐Yan Zhou, Tao Jia, Tian‐Hao Su, Yun‐Hong Tan, Qiang Liu, Tao Wang, Yu‐Xuan Mo, Hai‐Xia Hu, Xiao‐Yan Pu, Xiao‐Fan Na, Su Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2745.70131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Epiphytes are believed to exhibit minimal internal nitrogen (N) isotopic composition (δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N) variation due to severe N limitation in canopy habitats. However, the lack of empirical evidence leaves this question open, complicating the interpretation of foliar δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N in understanding the N economy of epiphytes.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, the variation in δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N between leaves and roots (∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf–root</jats:sub>) of 24 epiphyte species from the tropical Xishuangbanna region of southwest China was calculated. Subsequent linear regression and variance decomposition were performed to identify the underlying driving factors.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>A small ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> (+0.43‰) was observed in epiphytes, which exhibited relatively consistent values across groups (−0.20‰ to 1.78‰) but markedly species‐specific values (−2.13‰ to 2.15‰), independently of phylogeny, reflecting the combined effects of external N sources and N acquisition strategies of epiphytes. In particular, positive ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> values were primarily correlated with leaf N and root carbon (C), while negative ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> values were associated with leaf C isotopic composition (δ<jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C), indicating that distinct <jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N fractionation progresses were at work.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. These results demonstrate for the first time that ∆<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N<jats:sub>leaf−root</jats:sub> is minimal yet noteworthy within epiphytes compared with soil‐rooted plants, reflecting the more severe N stress in the canopy habitats, and suggest that foliar δ<jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N—when accounting for <jats:sup>15</jats:sup>N fractionation—can provide valuable insights into the N dynamics of tropical epiphytes.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>\",\"PeriodicalId\":191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70131\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.70131","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Group‐consistent but species‐specific nitrogen isotope fractionation between leaves and roots in tropical vascular epiphytes
Epiphytes are believed to exhibit minimal internal nitrogen (N) isotopic composition (δ15N) variation due to severe N limitation in canopy habitats. However, the lack of empirical evidence leaves this question open, complicating the interpretation of foliar δ15N in understanding the N economy of epiphytes.Here, the variation in δ15N between leaves and roots (∆15Nleaf–root) of 24 epiphyte species from the tropical Xishuangbanna region of southwest China was calculated. Subsequent linear regression and variance decomposition were performed to identify the underlying driving factors.A small ∆15Nleaf−root (+0.43‰) was observed in epiphytes, which exhibited relatively consistent values across groups (−0.20‰ to 1.78‰) but markedly species‐specific values (−2.13‰ to 2.15‰), independently of phylogeny, reflecting the combined effects of external N sources and N acquisition strategies of epiphytes. In particular, positive ∆15Nleaf−root values were primarily correlated with leaf N and root carbon (C), while negative ∆15Nleaf−root values were associated with leaf C isotopic composition (δ13C), indicating that distinct 15N fractionation progresses were at work.Synthesis. These results demonstrate for the first time that ∆15Nleaf−root is minimal yet noteworthy within epiphytes compared with soil‐rooted plants, reflecting the more severe N stress in the canopy habitats, and suggest that foliar δ15N—when accounting for 15N fractionation—can provide valuable insights into the N dynamics of tropical epiphytes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants.
We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.