儿童和青少年肥胖:世界卫生组织临床指南的范围、运动和优先次序

IF 4.8 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Hector Pardo-Hernandez, Amaya Stifano, Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas, Francesco Branca, Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal
{"title":"儿童和青少年肥胖:世界卫生组织临床指南的范围、运动和优先次序","authors":"Hector Pardo-Hernandez,&nbsp;Amaya Stifano,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas,&nbsp;Francesco Branca,&nbsp;Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current clinical guidance on children and adolescent obesity management is limited in scope and in addressing obesogenic factors, reaching underserved populations, and developing whole-of-society solutions. To address these shortcomings, the World Health Organization (WHO) set out to develop people-centered normative guidance for the integrated management of children and adolescents with obesity using a primary healthcare approach. WHO undertook a prioritization exercise consisting of (1) scoping of initial questions and outcomes, (2) public notice and comment, (3) guideline development group establishment and consultation, and (4) final approval. Initial questions and outcomes were compiled from core outcome sets and documents from WHO, United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), and other UN agencies. Stakeholders and potential guideline development group members were identified from existing WHO resources and a call for experts. The public notice and comment involved assessment of initial questions and outcomes via a Delphi prioritization consensus survey, which received 349 full responses from 78 countries. Results were assessed and refined by the WHO obesity steering committee and two established guideline development groups: children and adolescents. The prioritization exercise resulted in eight background questions, 19 key questions for guideline development, 11 critical outcomes for decision-making, and 10 important but not critical outcomes for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1551 1","pages":"210-223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obesity in children and adolescents: Scoping exercise and prioritization for World Health Organization clinical guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Hector Pardo-Hernandez,&nbsp;Amaya Stifano,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas,&nbsp;Francesco Branca,&nbsp;Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nyas.15412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Current clinical guidance on children and adolescent obesity management is limited in scope and in addressing obesogenic factors, reaching underserved populations, and developing whole-of-society solutions. To address these shortcomings, the World Health Organization (WHO) set out to develop people-centered normative guidance for the integrated management of children and adolescents with obesity using a primary healthcare approach. WHO undertook a prioritization exercise consisting of (1) scoping of initial questions and outcomes, (2) public notice and comment, (3) guideline development group establishment and consultation, and (4) final approval. Initial questions and outcomes were compiled from core outcome sets and documents from WHO, United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), and other UN agencies. Stakeholders and potential guideline development group members were identified from existing WHO resources and a call for experts. The public notice and comment involved assessment of initial questions and outcomes via a Delphi prioritization consensus survey, which received 349 full responses from 78 countries. Results were assessed and refined by the WHO obesity steering committee and two established guideline development groups: children and adolescents. The prioritization exercise resulted in eight background questions, 19 key questions for guideline development, 11 critical outcomes for decision-making, and 10 important but not critical outcomes for decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1551 1\",\"pages\":\"210-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.15412\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于儿童和青少年肥胖管理的临床指导在范围和解决肥胖因素、覆盖服务不足的人群和制定全社会解决方案方面是有限的。为了解决这些不足,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)着手制定以人为本的规范指南,用于使用初级卫生保健方法对肥胖儿童和青少年进行综合管理。世卫组织开展了一项重点确定工作,包括(1)确定初步问题和结果的范围,(2)公告和评论,(3)建立指南制定小组并进行磋商,以及(4)最终批准。初步问题和结果是根据世卫组织、联合国儿童基金会(儿基会)和其他联合国机构的核心成果集和文件编制的。从现有的世卫组织资源和专家呼吁中确定了利益攸关方和潜在的指南制定小组成员。公告和评论涉及通过德尔菲优先顺序共识调查对初始问题和结果进行评估,该调查收到了来自78个国家的349份完整回复。结果由世卫组织肥胖指导委员会和两个已建立的指南制定小组(儿童和青少年)评估和完善。优先排序工作产生了8个背景问题,19个指南制定的关键问题,11个决策的关键结果,以及10个重要但不关键的决策结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obesity in children and adolescents: Scoping exercise and prioritization for World Health Organization clinical guidelines

Obesity in children and adolescents: Scoping exercise and prioritization for World Health Organization clinical guidelines

Obesity in children and adolescents: Scoping exercise and prioritization for World Health Organization clinical guidelines

Obesity in children and adolescents: Scoping exercise and prioritization for World Health Organization clinical guidelines

Current clinical guidance on children and adolescent obesity management is limited in scope and in addressing obesogenic factors, reaching underserved populations, and developing whole-of-society solutions. To address these shortcomings, the World Health Organization (WHO) set out to develop people-centered normative guidance for the integrated management of children and adolescents with obesity using a primary healthcare approach. WHO undertook a prioritization exercise consisting of (1) scoping of initial questions and outcomes, (2) public notice and comment, (3) guideline development group establishment and consultation, and (4) final approval. Initial questions and outcomes were compiled from core outcome sets and documents from WHO, United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), and other UN agencies. Stakeholders and potential guideline development group members were identified from existing WHO resources and a call for experts. The public notice and comment involved assessment of initial questions and outcomes via a Delphi prioritization consensus survey, which received 349 full responses from 78 countries. Results were assessed and refined by the WHO obesity steering committee and two established guideline development groups: children and adolescents. The prioritization exercise resulted in eight background questions, 19 key questions for guideline development, 11 critical outcomes for decision-making, and 10 important but not critical outcomes for decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信