从持续气道正压切换到双水平气道正压对持续气道正压相关嗜气症症状的影响:一项观察性研究,两部分系列的第二部分

IF 2
Takero Fukutome
{"title":"从持续气道正压切换到双水平气道正压对持续气道正压相关嗜气症症状的影响:一项观察性研究,两部分系列的第二部分","authors":"Takero Fukutome","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03423-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aerophagia occurring during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (C-aerophagia) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea can impede treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for managing C-aerophagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients newly diagnosed with C-aerophagia who switched from CPAP to auto-BiPAP were monitored. Assessment criteria included flatulence, eructation, abdominal bloating, quantitative evaluation, and onset time. BiPAP effectiveness was categorized as excellent-E (no criteria met), slight-E (partially met), or poor-E (criteria met). C-aerophagia discomfort, including residual cases on BiPAP, was rated via a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = none, 10 = extreme). Satisfaction with BiPAP was evaluated as positive or negative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BiPAP effectiveness was excellent in 80.4%, slight in 4.0%, and poor in 15.7% of the patients. The VAS scores decreased significantly with BiPAP compared with those with CPAP (p < 0.001). In the poor-E group, five patients reported positive satisfaction with BiPAP and showed reduced VAS scores. A reduction in 90th percentile expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) compared with the 90th-95th percentile pressure of CPAP was associated with resolved C-aerophagia, indicating that reducing expiratory pressure while maintaining airway patency is essential. However, eight patients with EPAP ≤ 6.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O experienced C-aerophagia, probably due to upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, indicating that alternative treatments are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BiPAP completely or partially resolved C-aerophagia symptoms in 84.3% of the patients. Among patients with residual symptoms, 62.5% (5/8) reported reduced discomfort and expressed satisfaction. Its effectiveness is likely due to lower expiratory pressure; however, in some cases, it remains challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 4","pages":"258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of switching from continuous positive airway pressure to bilevel positive airway pressure on symptoms of continuous positive airway pressure-related aerophagia: an observational study part two of a two-part series.\",\"authors\":\"Takero Fukutome\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-025-03423-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aerophagia occurring during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (C-aerophagia) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea can impede treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for managing C-aerophagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one patients newly diagnosed with C-aerophagia who switched from CPAP to auto-BiPAP were monitored. Assessment criteria included flatulence, eructation, abdominal bloating, quantitative evaluation, and onset time. BiPAP effectiveness was categorized as excellent-E (no criteria met), slight-E (partially met), or poor-E (criteria met). C-aerophagia discomfort, including residual cases on BiPAP, was rated via a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = none, 10 = extreme). Satisfaction with BiPAP was evaluated as positive or negative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BiPAP effectiveness was excellent in 80.4%, slight in 4.0%, and poor in 15.7% of the patients. The VAS scores decreased significantly with BiPAP compared with those with CPAP (p < 0.001). In the poor-E group, five patients reported positive satisfaction with BiPAP and showed reduced VAS scores. A reduction in 90th percentile expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) compared with the 90th-95th percentile pressure of CPAP was associated with resolved C-aerophagia, indicating that reducing expiratory pressure while maintaining airway patency is essential. However, eight patients with EPAP ≤ 6.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O experienced C-aerophagia, probably due to upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, indicating that alternative treatments are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BiPAP completely or partially resolved C-aerophagia symptoms in 84.3% of the patients. Among patients with residual symptoms, 62.5% (5/8) reported reduced discomfort and expressed satisfaction. Its effectiveness is likely due to lower expiratory pressure; however, in some cases, it remains challenging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03423-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03423-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者在持续气道正压通气(CPAP) (C-aerophagia)过程中发生的气吞会阻碍治疗。本研究旨在评估双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)在治疗c型噬气症中的应用。方法:对51例由CPAP转为自动bipap的新诊断c -气吞噬患者进行监测。评估标准包括胀气、嗳气、腹胀、定量评价和发病时间。BiPAP有效性分为优秀e级(未达到标准)、轻微e级(部分达到标准)和差e级(达到标准)。c -噬气性不适,包括BiPAP残留病例,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评分;0 =无,10 =极端)。对BiPAP的满意度评估为阳性或阴性。结果:80.4%的患者疗效优,4.0%的患者疗效差,15.7%的患者疗效差。与CPAP组相比,BiPAP组VAS评分明显下降(p2o出现c -气吞噬,可能是由于食管上括约肌松弛,表明需要替代治疗。结论:BiPAP完全或部分缓解了84.3%患者的c -气吞噬症状。在残留症状的患者中,62.5%(5/8)表示不适减轻并表示满意。其有效性可能是由于较低的呼气压;然而,在某些情况下,它仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of switching from continuous positive airway pressure to bilevel positive airway pressure on symptoms of continuous positive airway pressure-related aerophagia: an observational study part two of a two-part series.

Purpose: Aerophagia occurring during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (C-aerophagia) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea can impede treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for managing C-aerophagia.

Methods: Fifty-one patients newly diagnosed with C-aerophagia who switched from CPAP to auto-BiPAP were monitored. Assessment criteria included flatulence, eructation, abdominal bloating, quantitative evaluation, and onset time. BiPAP effectiveness was categorized as excellent-E (no criteria met), slight-E (partially met), or poor-E (criteria met). C-aerophagia discomfort, including residual cases on BiPAP, was rated via a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = none, 10 = extreme). Satisfaction with BiPAP was evaluated as positive or negative.

Results: BiPAP effectiveness was excellent in 80.4%, slight in 4.0%, and poor in 15.7% of the patients. The VAS scores decreased significantly with BiPAP compared with those with CPAP (p < 0.001). In the poor-E group, five patients reported positive satisfaction with BiPAP and showed reduced VAS scores. A reduction in 90th percentile expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) compared with the 90th-95th percentile pressure of CPAP was associated with resolved C-aerophagia, indicating that reducing expiratory pressure while maintaining airway patency is essential. However, eight patients with EPAP ≤ 6.5 cmH2O experienced C-aerophagia, probably due to upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, indicating that alternative treatments are needed.

Conclusion: BiPAP completely or partially resolved C-aerophagia symptoms in 84.3% of the patients. Among patients with residual symptoms, 62.5% (5/8) reported reduced discomfort and expressed satisfaction. Its effectiveness is likely due to lower expiratory pressure; however, in some cases, it remains challenging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信