理论指导处方兴奋剂滥用和转移课程的开发和交付:效度,德尔菲和前后测试的结果。

Maysaa Chaalan, Sarah Iglesias, Shelby Samuelson, Liz Barnett, Alison Looby, Niloofar Bavarian
{"title":"理论指导处方兴奋剂滥用和转移课程的开发和交付:效度,德尔菲和前后测试的结果。","authors":"Maysaa Chaalan, Sarah Iglesias, Shelby Samuelson, Liz Barnett, Alison Looby, Niloofar Bavarian","doi":"10.1177/29767342251355128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past studies have shown a large percentage of college health providers (CHPs) feel responsible yet unprepared to address prescription stimulant misuse (PSM) and prescription stimulant diversion (PSD). As such, the authors developed a theory-guided, universal curriculum for CHPs to more confidently address PSM and PSD among their student populations. The purpose of the current study was to refine the curriculum using a multistep approach and assess the impact on providers' PSM and PSD knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial version of the curriculum was reviewed for content validity by 2 content/curriculum experts. Next, 5 students reviewed a revised version of the curriculum for face validity. The authors further refined the curriculum using the Delphi technique; specifically, a geographically diverse sample of 28 CHPs rated the appropriateness and clarity of each topic within each objective of the curriculum. Next, staff (N = 27) at 1 student health center received the training and completed a pre-post assessment to evaluate impact on knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy. Quantitative (eg, means, medians, paired <i>t</i>-tests) and qualitative feedback were reviewed to guide refinement. These activities were completed between August 2023 and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criteria for content and face validity were met based on the reviews by curriculum experts and students, respectively. The Delphi technique required 2 rounds. All discussion topics had median and mode scores that reflected appropriateness and clarity. Pre-post assessment of the training showed significant improvements in CHPs knowledge, norms, self-efficacy, implementation barriers, and confidence to overcome barriers related to addressing PSM and PSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multistep process produced a comprehensive and theory-guided curriculum. Curriculum receipt resulted in improvements in multiple domains. Next steps include using an experimental design to test the impact of an intervention based on this training on student behavior, as well as digitizing and disseminating the training.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251355128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Delivery of a Theory-Guided Prescription Stimulant Misuse and Diversion Curriculum for College Health Providers: Results From Validity, Delphi, and Pre-Post Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Maysaa Chaalan, Sarah Iglesias, Shelby Samuelson, Liz Barnett, Alison Looby, Niloofar Bavarian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/29767342251355128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Past studies have shown a large percentage of college health providers (CHPs) feel responsible yet unprepared to address prescription stimulant misuse (PSM) and prescription stimulant diversion (PSD). As such, the authors developed a theory-guided, universal curriculum for CHPs to more confidently address PSM and PSD among their student populations. The purpose of the current study was to refine the curriculum using a multistep approach and assess the impact on providers' PSM and PSD knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The initial version of the curriculum was reviewed for content validity by 2 content/curriculum experts. Next, 5 students reviewed a revised version of the curriculum for face validity. The authors further refined the curriculum using the Delphi technique; specifically, a geographically diverse sample of 28 CHPs rated the appropriateness and clarity of each topic within each objective of the curriculum. Next, staff (N = 27) at 1 student health center received the training and completed a pre-post assessment to evaluate impact on knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy. Quantitative (eg, means, medians, paired <i>t</i>-tests) and qualitative feedback were reviewed to guide refinement. These activities were completed between August 2023 and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The criteria for content and face validity were met based on the reviews by curriculum experts and students, respectively. The Delphi technique required 2 rounds. All discussion topics had median and mode scores that reflected appropriateness and clarity. Pre-post assessment of the training showed significant improvements in CHPs knowledge, norms, self-efficacy, implementation barriers, and confidence to overcome barriers related to addressing PSM and PSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multistep process produced a comprehensive and theory-guided curriculum. Curriculum receipt resulted in improvements in multiple domains. Next steps include using an experimental design to test the impact of an intervention based on this training on student behavior, as well as digitizing and disseminating the training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"29767342251355128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance use & addiction journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251355128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251355128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:过去的研究表明,很大比例的大学卫生服务提供者(CHPs)感到有责任,但没有准备好解决处方兴奋剂滥用(PSM)和处方兴奋剂转移(PSD)。因此,作者为CHPs开发了一个理论指导的通用课程,以更自信地在学生群体中解决PSM和PSD问题。本研究的目的是采用多步骤的方法来完善课程,并评估对提供者PSM和PSD知识、态度、规范、障碍和自我效能的影响。方法:由2名内容/课程专家对课程初版进行内容效度评估。接下来,5名学生对修改后的课程进行了面部效度评估。作者利用德尔菲技术进一步完善了课程;具体来说,28个地理位置不同的卫生保健中心对课程目标中每个主题的适当性和清晰度进行了评分。接下来,27名学生健康中心的工作人员接受了培训,并完成了对知识、态度、规范、障碍和自我效能感的前后评估。定量(如均值、中位数、配对t检验)和定性反馈进行了回顾,以指导改进。这些活动在2023年8月至2024年8月之间完成。结果:根据课程专家和学生的评价,内容效度和表面效度分别达到标准。德尔菲法需要2轮。所有的讨论主题都有反映适当性和清晰度的中位数和模式得分。培训的前后评估显示,卫生保健人员的知识、规范、自我效能、实施障碍和克服与解决PSM和PSD相关障碍的信心有了显着改善。结论:一个多步骤的过程产生了一个全面和理论指导的课程。课程接收导致了多个领域的改进。接下来的步骤包括使用实验设计来测试基于这种培训的干预对学生行为的影响,以及数字化和传播培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Delivery of a Theory-Guided Prescription Stimulant Misuse and Diversion Curriculum for College Health Providers: Results From Validity, Delphi, and Pre-Post Testing.

Background: Past studies have shown a large percentage of college health providers (CHPs) feel responsible yet unprepared to address prescription stimulant misuse (PSM) and prescription stimulant diversion (PSD). As such, the authors developed a theory-guided, universal curriculum for CHPs to more confidently address PSM and PSD among their student populations. The purpose of the current study was to refine the curriculum using a multistep approach and assess the impact on providers' PSM and PSD knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy.

Methods: The initial version of the curriculum was reviewed for content validity by 2 content/curriculum experts. Next, 5 students reviewed a revised version of the curriculum for face validity. The authors further refined the curriculum using the Delphi technique; specifically, a geographically diverse sample of 28 CHPs rated the appropriateness and clarity of each topic within each objective of the curriculum. Next, staff (N = 27) at 1 student health center received the training and completed a pre-post assessment to evaluate impact on knowledge, attitudes, norms, barriers, and self-efficacy. Quantitative (eg, means, medians, paired t-tests) and qualitative feedback were reviewed to guide refinement. These activities were completed between August 2023 and August 2024.

Results: The criteria for content and face validity were met based on the reviews by curriculum experts and students, respectively. The Delphi technique required 2 rounds. All discussion topics had median and mode scores that reflected appropriateness and clarity. Pre-post assessment of the training showed significant improvements in CHPs knowledge, norms, self-efficacy, implementation barriers, and confidence to overcome barriers related to addressing PSM and PSD.

Conclusions: A multistep process produced a comprehensive and theory-guided curriculum. Curriculum receipt resulted in improvements in multiple domains. Next steps include using an experimental design to test the impact of an intervention based on this training on student behavior, as well as digitizing and disseminating the training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信