Alexander V Alenichev, Sergey V Chubchenko, Sergey G Gavrilov
{"title":"髂静脉支架置入治疗女性盆腔静脉疾病:一项系统综述。","authors":"Alexander V Alenichev, Sergey V Chubchenko, Sergey G Gavrilov","doi":"10.1177/02683555251365068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCompression stenosis of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) in combination with pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) represents a form of pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs). Iliac vein stent placement (IVSP), aimed at restoring adequate blood flow through the iliac veins, is considered an optimal treatment for this disorder.AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVSP in the treatment of PVI based on a systematic analysis of literature data.MethodsAn analysis of publications on use of IVSP in the treatment of a combination of LCIV compression and PVI from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the period from January 2000 to December 2023 was carried out. Eligible were reports from randomized pro- and retrospective cohort studies and case series for more than 10 patients with the clinical and radiological data used to confirm indication for LCIV stenting and to assess the status of iliac and pelvic veins after the procedure. Isolated clinical cases, comments, letters, duplicate articles, publications on IVSP in patients without PVI symptoms and signs or describing the treatment of chronic venous and post-thrombotic diseases were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-ME tool for systematic reviews.ResultsA total of eight studies representing data of 1605 patients with a combination of LCIV compression and PVI were selected. The efficacy of isolated IVSP in relieving CPP and other symptoms and signs of PVI ranged from 16% to 80%. Gonadal vein embolization (GVE) after IVSP was required in 20 to 84% of cases. Complications related to IVSP had low SIR class and occurred in less than 1% of cases.ConclusionThe primary LCIV stenting is an effective and safe treatment for patients with LCIV compression and PVI, while GVE should be reserved as second line treatment in case of its clinical failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251365068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iliac vein stent placement in the treatment of pelvic venous disorders in women: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander V Alenichev, Sergey V Chubchenko, Sergey G Gavrilov\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251365068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundCompression stenosis of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) in combination with pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) represents a form of pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs). Iliac vein stent placement (IVSP), aimed at restoring adequate blood flow through the iliac veins, is considered an optimal treatment for this disorder.AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVSP in the treatment of PVI based on a systematic analysis of literature data.MethodsAn analysis of publications on use of IVSP in the treatment of a combination of LCIV compression and PVI from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the period from January 2000 to December 2023 was carried out. Eligible were reports from randomized pro- and retrospective cohort studies and case series for more than 10 patients with the clinical and radiological data used to confirm indication for LCIV stenting and to assess the status of iliac and pelvic veins after the procedure. Isolated clinical cases, comments, letters, duplicate articles, publications on IVSP in patients without PVI symptoms and signs or describing the treatment of chronic venous and post-thrombotic diseases were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-ME tool for systematic reviews.ResultsA total of eight studies representing data of 1605 patients with a combination of LCIV compression and PVI were selected. The efficacy of isolated IVSP in relieving CPP and other symptoms and signs of PVI ranged from 16% to 80%. Gonadal vein embolization (GVE) after IVSP was required in 20 to 84% of cases. Complications related to IVSP had low SIR class and occurred in less than 1% of cases.ConclusionThe primary LCIV stenting is an effective and safe treatment for patients with LCIV compression and PVI, while GVE should be reserved as second line treatment in case of its clinical failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251365068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251365068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:左髂总静脉(LCIV)压迫性狭窄合并盆腔静脉功能不全(PVI)是盆腔静脉疾病(pevd)的一种形式。髂静脉支架置入(IVSP),旨在恢复足够的血液流经髂静脉,被认为是治疗这种疾病的最佳方法。目的在系统分析文献资料的基础上,评价IVSP治疗PVI的疗效和安全性。方法分析2000年1月至2023年12月PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中关于使用IVSP治疗LCIV压缩合并PVI的文献。符合条件的报告来自随机的前瞻性和回顾性队列研究以及超过10例患者的病例系列,这些患者的临床和放射学数据用于确认LCIV支架植入术的适应症,并评估手术后髂和骨盆静脉的状态。孤立的临床病例、评论、信件、重复的文章、关于IVSP在无PVI症状和体征的患者中或描述慢性静脉和血栓后疾病治疗的出版物被排除在外。使用ROB-ME工具进行系统评价,评估偏倚风险。结果共纳入8项研究,共计1605例LCIV压迫合并PVI患者。分离IVSP在缓解CPP和其他PVI症状和体征方面的疗效为16%至80%。20% ~ 84%的病例需要在IVSP后进行性腺静脉栓塞(GVE)。与IVSP相关的并发症的SIR级别较低,发生率不到1%。结论初级LCIV支架置入术对LCIV压迫合并PVI患者是一种安全有效的治疗方法,如果临床失败,应保留GVE作为二线治疗。
Iliac vein stent placement in the treatment of pelvic venous disorders in women: A systematic review.
BackgroundCompression stenosis of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) in combination with pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) represents a form of pelvic venous disorders (PeVDs). Iliac vein stent placement (IVSP), aimed at restoring adequate blood flow through the iliac veins, is considered an optimal treatment for this disorder.AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVSP in the treatment of PVI based on a systematic analysis of literature data.MethodsAn analysis of publications on use of IVSP in the treatment of a combination of LCIV compression and PVI from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for the period from January 2000 to December 2023 was carried out. Eligible were reports from randomized pro- and retrospective cohort studies and case series for more than 10 patients with the clinical and radiological data used to confirm indication for LCIV stenting and to assess the status of iliac and pelvic veins after the procedure. Isolated clinical cases, comments, letters, duplicate articles, publications on IVSP in patients without PVI symptoms and signs or describing the treatment of chronic venous and post-thrombotic diseases were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-ME tool for systematic reviews.ResultsA total of eight studies representing data of 1605 patients with a combination of LCIV compression and PVI were selected. The efficacy of isolated IVSP in relieving CPP and other symptoms and signs of PVI ranged from 16% to 80%. Gonadal vein embolization (GVE) after IVSP was required in 20 to 84% of cases. Complications related to IVSP had low SIR class and occurred in less than 1% of cases.ConclusionThe primary LCIV stenting is an effective and safe treatment for patients with LCIV compression and PVI, while GVE should be reserved as second line treatment in case of its clinical failure.