肠道微生物组荟萃分析揭示了结直肠癌患者的生态失调模式。

IF 2
Ranxin Yan, Rui Zheng, Yucheng Han, Ge Song, Ban Huo, Han Sun
{"title":"肠道微生物组荟萃分析揭示了结直肠癌患者的生态失调模式。","authors":"Ranxin Yan, Rui Zheng, Yucheng Han, Ge Song, Ban Huo, Han Sun","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumour in which dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is a contributing factor in the development of cancer. However, the species composition and species-specific changes in the gut microbiome related to CRC still require comprehensive investigation.<b>Hypothesis.</b> There is a significant difference in gut microbiome between CRC patients and healthy individuals.<b>Aim.</b> The microbiome-based association test methods are used for the association between the microbiome and host phenotypes, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis is employed to search for microbial biomarkers associated with CRC.<b>Methodology.</b> We conducted a meta-analysis of microbiome data from multiple cohorts, totalling 1,462 samples and 320 genus-level features. Considering the data obtained under different experimental conditions, we removed the batch effect using conditional quantile regression. Then, we employed the common analysis processes and methods of microbiome data, including microbial diversity analysis, microbiome-based association test analysis and microbial differential abundance analysis.<b>Results.</b> The experimental results showed that there were significant differences in <i>α</i>-diversity between the CRC group and the healthy group, as well as in the overall microbial community (PERMANOVA <i>P</i>-value less than 0.05). LEfSe analysis also demonstrated the genus-level features enriched in the gut of CRC patients and the genus-level features enriched in the gut of healthy individuals. Notably, the batch effect-corrected data exhibit more significant performance than the raw data.<b>Conclusion.</b> Gut microbiome composition is a significant factor associated with the development of CRC. <i>Enterobacter</i> and <i>Fusobacterium</i> enriched in the gut of CRC patients may be CRC-related microbial biomarkers, while <i>Bacteroides</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium</i> enriched in the gut of healthy individuals are core genera of the healthy gut. In addition, batch effects in microbiome data caused by differences in sample handling may lead to false discoveries, especially large-scale microbiome data. These findings could deepen the understanding of the role played by gut microbes in CRC and are expected to provide recommendations for the diagnosis of cancer and the development of new microbial therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of gut microbiome reveals patterns of dysbiosis in colorectal cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ranxin Yan, Rui Zheng, Yucheng Han, Ge Song, Ban Huo, Han Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.002042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumour in which dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is a contributing factor in the development of cancer. However, the species composition and species-specific changes in the gut microbiome related to CRC still require comprehensive investigation.<b>Hypothesis.</b> There is a significant difference in gut microbiome between CRC patients and healthy individuals.<b>Aim.</b> The microbiome-based association test methods are used for the association between the microbiome and host phenotypes, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis is employed to search for microbial biomarkers associated with CRC.<b>Methodology.</b> We conducted a meta-analysis of microbiome data from multiple cohorts, totalling 1,462 samples and 320 genus-level features. Considering the data obtained under different experimental conditions, we removed the batch effect using conditional quantile regression. Then, we employed the common analysis processes and methods of microbiome data, including microbial diversity analysis, microbiome-based association test analysis and microbial differential abundance analysis.<b>Results.</b> The experimental results showed that there were significant differences in <i>α</i>-diversity between the CRC group and the healthy group, as well as in the overall microbial community (PERMANOVA <i>P</i>-value less than 0.05). LEfSe analysis also demonstrated the genus-level features enriched in the gut of CRC patients and the genus-level features enriched in the gut of healthy individuals. Notably, the batch effect-corrected data exhibit more significant performance than the raw data.<b>Conclusion.</b> Gut microbiome composition is a significant factor associated with the development of CRC. <i>Enterobacter</i> and <i>Fusobacterium</i> enriched in the gut of CRC patients may be CRC-related microbial biomarkers, while <i>Bacteroides</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium</i> enriched in the gut of healthy individuals are core genera of the healthy gut. In addition, batch effects in microbiome data caused by differences in sample handling may lead to false discoveries, especially large-scale microbiome data. These findings could deepen the understanding of the role played by gut microbes in CRC and are expected to provide recommendations for the diagnosis of cancer and the development of new microbial therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"74 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。结直肠癌(CRC)是一种恶性肿瘤,其中肠道微生物群失调是癌症发展的一个促进因素。然而,与结直肠癌相关的肠道微生物组的物种组成和物种特异性变化仍需要全面的研究。结直肠癌患者肠道菌群与健康人群存在显著差异。采用基于微生物组的关联检验方法检测微生物组与宿主表型之间的关联,采用线性判别分析效应量(LEfSe)分析寻找与crc相关的微生物生物标志物。我们对来自多个队列的微生物组数据进行了荟萃分析,共1462个样本和320个属级特征。考虑到在不同实验条件下获得的数据,我们使用条件分位数回归去除批次效应。然后,我们采用了微生物组数据的常用分析流程和方法,包括微生物多样性分析、基于微生物组的关联检验分析和微生物差异丰度分析。实验结果显示,结直肠癌组与健康组之间,以及整体微生物群落之间α-多样性存在显著差异(PERMANOVA p值小于0.05)。LEfSe分析还证实了CRC患者肠道中富集的属水平特征和健康个体肠道中富集的属水平特征。值得注意的是,批效应校正后的数据比原始数据表现出更显著的性能。肠道菌群组成是与结直肠癌发生相关的重要因素。CRC患者肠道中富集的肠杆菌(Enterobacter)和梭杆菌(Fusobacterium)可能是CRC相关的微生物生物标志物,而健康个体肠道中富集的拟杆菌(Bacteroides)和粪杆菌(Faecalibacterium)是健康肠道的核心属。此外,由于样品处理的差异而导致的微生物组数据的批量效应可能导致错误的发现,特别是大规模的微生物组数据。这些发现可以加深对肠道微生物在结直肠癌中所起作用的理解,并有望为癌症的诊断和新的微生物疗法的开发提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-analysis of gut microbiome reveals patterns of dysbiosis in colorectal cancer patients.

Introduction. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a malignant tumour in which dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is a contributing factor in the development of cancer. However, the species composition and species-specific changes in the gut microbiome related to CRC still require comprehensive investigation.Hypothesis. There is a significant difference in gut microbiome between CRC patients and healthy individuals.Aim. The microbiome-based association test methods are used for the association between the microbiome and host phenotypes, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis is employed to search for microbial biomarkers associated with CRC.Methodology. We conducted a meta-analysis of microbiome data from multiple cohorts, totalling 1,462 samples and 320 genus-level features. Considering the data obtained under different experimental conditions, we removed the batch effect using conditional quantile regression. Then, we employed the common analysis processes and methods of microbiome data, including microbial diversity analysis, microbiome-based association test analysis and microbial differential abundance analysis.Results. The experimental results showed that there were significant differences in α-diversity between the CRC group and the healthy group, as well as in the overall microbial community (PERMANOVA P-value less than 0.05). LEfSe analysis also demonstrated the genus-level features enriched in the gut of CRC patients and the genus-level features enriched in the gut of healthy individuals. Notably, the batch effect-corrected data exhibit more significant performance than the raw data.Conclusion. Gut microbiome composition is a significant factor associated with the development of CRC. Enterobacter and Fusobacterium enriched in the gut of CRC patients may be CRC-related microbial biomarkers, while Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium enriched in the gut of healthy individuals are core genera of the healthy gut. In addition, batch effects in microbiome data caused by differences in sample handling may lead to false discoveries, especially large-scale microbiome data. These findings could deepen the understanding of the role played by gut microbes in CRC and are expected to provide recommendations for the diagnosis of cancer and the development of new microbial therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信