Fabio Pregaldini, Mevlüt Çelik, Maria Nucera, Selim Mosbahi, Kai Alexander Münker, Paul Potratz, Fabien Praz, David Reineke, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh
{"title":"经导管边缘到边缘二尖瓣修复失败后,电外科割伤和固定夹后经尖顶二尖瓣置换术:一种有希望的手术替代方法。","authors":"Fabio Pregaldini, Mevlüt Çelik, Maria Nucera, Selim Mosbahi, Kai Alexander Münker, Paul Potratz, Fabien Praz, David Reineke, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study analyses perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of the clip (ELASTA-clip), followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS) after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who experienced failure of a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and subsequently underwent either the ELASTA-clip procedure followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional open MVS were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes including mortality, stroke, bleeding, pacemaker implantation, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were assessed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 patients were enrolled in the ELASTA group and 31 in the open surgery group, with median follow-up periods of 2 years [IQR: 1.2-2.1] and 1.4 years [IQR: 0.3-3.7], respectively. Procedural success was achieved in all ELASTA cases (100%) compared to 96% in the open surgery group. No in-hospital deaths occurred in the ELASTA group, whereas the surgical group had a mortality rate of 6.5% (n = 2). During follow-up, adverse events occurred in 20% (n = 1) of ELASTA patients and 54.8% (n = 17) of those who underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical intervention in patients with failed edge-to-edge mitral valve repair carries a high risk of complications. The ELASTA-clip technique, combined with transapical mitral valve replacement, offers a minimally invasive and safe alternative to conventional surgery, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrosurgical Laceration and Stabilization of Clip Followed by Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement after Failed Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Promising Alternative to Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Pregaldini, Mevlüt Çelik, Maria Nucera, Selim Mosbahi, Kai Alexander Münker, Paul Potratz, Fabien Praz, David Reineke, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icvts/ivaf183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study analyses perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of the clip (ELASTA-clip), followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS) after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who experienced failure of a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and subsequently underwent either the ELASTA-clip procedure followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional open MVS were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes including mortality, stroke, bleeding, pacemaker implantation, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were assessed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 patients were enrolled in the ELASTA group and 31 in the open surgery group, with median follow-up periods of 2 years [IQR: 1.2-2.1] and 1.4 years [IQR: 0.3-3.7], respectively. Procedural success was achieved in all ELASTA cases (100%) compared to 96% in the open surgery group. No in-hospital deaths occurred in the ELASTA group, whereas the surgical group had a mortality rate of 6.5% (n = 2). During follow-up, adverse events occurred in 20% (n = 1) of ELASTA patients and 54.8% (n = 17) of those who underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical intervention in patients with failed edge-to-edge mitral valve repair carries a high risk of complications. The ELASTA-clip technique, combined with transapical mitral valve replacement, offers a minimally invasive and safe alternative to conventional surgery, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342810/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrosurgical Laceration and Stabilization of Clip Followed by Transapical Mitral Valve Replacement after Failed Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair: A Promising Alternative to Surgery.
Objectives: The study analyses perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter electrosurgical laceration and stabilization of the clip (ELASTA-clip), followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional mitral valve surgery (MVS) after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.
Methods: Consecutive patients who experienced failure of a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair and subsequently underwent either the ELASTA-clip procedure followed by transapical mitral valve replacement or conventional open MVS were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and mid-term outcomes including mortality, stroke, bleeding, pacemaker implantation, and the need for mechanical circulatory support were assessed descriptively.
Results: A total of 5 patients were enrolled in the ELASTA group and 31 in the open surgery group, with median follow-up periods of 2 years [IQR: 1.2-2.1] and 1.4 years [IQR: 0.3-3.7], respectively. Procedural success was achieved in all ELASTA cases (100%) compared to 96% in the open surgery group. No in-hospital deaths occurred in the ELASTA group, whereas the surgical group had a mortality rate of 6.5% (n = 2). During follow-up, adverse events occurred in 20% (n = 1) of ELASTA patients and 54.8% (n = 17) of those who underwent surgery.
Conclusions: Surgical intervention in patients with failed edge-to-edge mitral valve repair carries a high risk of complications. The ELASTA-clip technique, combined with transapical mitral valve replacement, offers a minimally invasive and safe alternative to conventional surgery, highlighting the need for further prospective studies with longer-term follow-up.