社会环境对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的重要性:来自英格兰和威尔士COVID-19服务变化和限制影响的定性证据。

IF 2.2
Kate Gridley, Marie Poole, Yvonne Birks, Ben Hicks, Josie Dixon, Alison Wheatley, Louise Robinson, Sube Banerjee
{"title":"社会环境对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的重要性:来自英格兰和威尔士COVID-19服务变化和限制影响的定性证据。","authors":"Kate Gridley, Marie Poole, Yvonne Birks, Ben Hicks, Josie Dixon, Alison Wheatley, Louise Robinson, Sube Banerjee","doi":"10.1177/14713012251361189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents evidence from multiple perspectives on the impact of changes to health and social care service delivery, and the related social environment, for people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative interview data from 130 people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals in England and Wales were collected for the DETERMIND and PriDem studies during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). These were analysed abductively by members of both teams, applying the lens of person-centred dementia theory. The lack of in-person social and professional contact was of great concern during the pandemic to people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals. Our overarching finding that service changes degraded the social environment of the person living with dementia had five sub-themes: (1) A state of limbo; (2) Social environment overlooked as a priority; (3) Effects on family carers; (4) Tensions between a medical versus person-centred approach; (5) Maintaining or regaining a focus on personhood. Crosscutting these was a risk that people who were already disadvantaged by isolation and impairment were most affected by service changes. Pressures on carers to facilitate and/or directly provide social stimulation in the absence of previous opportunities might explain the concurrent deterioration of carers' quality of life. Professionals worked hard to find ways to tailor support and facilitate social contact within the limits of pandemic restrictions, demonstrating that this is possible and should be prioritised. A further suggestion was to delineate dementia social groups as 'necessary care' in future, given their importance to the wellbeing of people living with dementia and their carers. We conclude that person-centred delivery can be achieved in even the most challenging of circumstances and should be a core consideration of future planning for crises, prioritising social wellbeing alongside medical need.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251361189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of the Social Environment for People Living With Dementia and Their Carers: Qualitative Evidence From DETERMIND and PriDem on the Impact of COVID-19 Service Changes and Restrictions in England and Wales.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Gridley, Marie Poole, Yvonne Birks, Ben Hicks, Josie Dixon, Alison Wheatley, Louise Robinson, Sube Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012251361189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper presents evidence from multiple perspectives on the impact of changes to health and social care service delivery, and the related social environment, for people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative interview data from 130 people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals in England and Wales were collected for the DETERMIND and PriDem studies during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). These were analysed abductively by members of both teams, applying the lens of person-centred dementia theory. The lack of in-person social and professional contact was of great concern during the pandemic to people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals. Our overarching finding that service changes degraded the social environment of the person living with dementia had five sub-themes: (1) A state of limbo; (2) Social environment overlooked as a priority; (3) Effects on family carers; (4) Tensions between a medical versus person-centred approach; (5) Maintaining or regaining a focus on personhood. Crosscutting these was a risk that people who were already disadvantaged by isolation and impairment were most affected by service changes. Pressures on carers to facilitate and/or directly provide social stimulation in the absence of previous opportunities might explain the concurrent deterioration of carers' quality of life. Professionals worked hard to find ways to tailor support and facilitate social contact within the limits of pandemic restrictions, demonstrating that this is possible and should be prioritised. A further suggestion was to delineate dementia social groups as 'necessary care' in future, given their importance to the wellbeing of people living with dementia and their carers. We conclude that person-centred delivery can be achieved in even the most challenging of circumstances and should be a core consideration of future planning for crises, prioritising social wellbeing alongside medical need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14713012251361189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251361189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251361189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从多个角度介绍了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,卫生和社会护理服务提供以及相关社会环境变化对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的影响。在COVID-19大流行高峰期(2020-2021年),为DETERMIND和PriDem研究收集了来自英格兰和威尔士130名痴呆症患者、家庭护理人员以及卫生和社会护理专业人员的定性访谈数据。两个团队的成员运用以人为中心的痴呆症理论对这些数据进行了分析。在大流行期间,缺乏面对面的社会和专业接触是痴呆症患者、家庭护理人员以及卫生和社会护理专业人员非常关注的问题。我们的总体研究发现,服务变化降低了痴呆症患者的社会环境,这有五个子主题:(1)一种不稳定的状态;(2)社会环境被忽视;(3)对家庭照顾者的影响;(4)以医疗为中心与以人为中心之间的紧张关系;(5)保持或重拾对人格的关注。横切这些是一种风险,即已经因孤立和受损而处于不利地位的人受服务变化的影响最大。在没有机会的情况下,照顾者有压力促进和/或直接提供社会刺激,这可能解释了照顾者的生活质量同时恶化的原因。专业人员努力寻找在大流行限制范围内量身定制支持和促进社会接触的方法,这表明这是可能的,应该予以优先考虑。进一步的建议是将痴呆症社会群体描述为未来的“必要护理”,因为他们对痴呆症患者及其护理人员的福祉很重要。我们的结论是,即使在最具挑战性的情况下,也可以实现以人为本的交付,并且应该成为未来危机规划的核心考虑因素,优先考虑社会福利和医疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Importance of the Social Environment for People Living With Dementia and Their Carers: Qualitative Evidence From DETERMIND and PriDem on the Impact of COVID-19 Service Changes and Restrictions in England and Wales.

This paper presents evidence from multiple perspectives on the impact of changes to health and social care service delivery, and the related social environment, for people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative interview data from 130 people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals in England and Wales were collected for the DETERMIND and PriDem studies during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). These were analysed abductively by members of both teams, applying the lens of person-centred dementia theory. The lack of in-person social and professional contact was of great concern during the pandemic to people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals. Our overarching finding that service changes degraded the social environment of the person living with dementia had five sub-themes: (1) A state of limbo; (2) Social environment overlooked as a priority; (3) Effects on family carers; (4) Tensions between a medical versus person-centred approach; (5) Maintaining or regaining a focus on personhood. Crosscutting these was a risk that people who were already disadvantaged by isolation and impairment were most affected by service changes. Pressures on carers to facilitate and/or directly provide social stimulation in the absence of previous opportunities might explain the concurrent deterioration of carers' quality of life. Professionals worked hard to find ways to tailor support and facilitate social contact within the limits of pandemic restrictions, demonstrating that this is possible and should be prioritised. A further suggestion was to delineate dementia social groups as 'necessary care' in future, given their importance to the wellbeing of people living with dementia and their carers. We conclude that person-centred delivery can be achieved in even the most challenging of circumstances and should be a core consideration of future planning for crises, prioritising social wellbeing alongside medical need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信