第一印象如何影响认知负荷评估:不同元素交互性的问题解决任务中的锚定效应。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Felix Krieglstein, Manuel Schmitz, Lukas Wesenberg, Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer, Günter Daniel Rey
{"title":"第一印象如何影响认知负荷评估:不同元素交互性的问题解决任务中的锚定效应。","authors":"Felix Krieglstein, Manuel Schmitz, Lukas Wesenberg, Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer, Günter Daniel Rey","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01764-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which people rely heavily on an initial piece of information when making judgments or decisions. Once an anchor - typically an objective numerical value - is set, subsequent assessments are adjusted around it, often insufficiently. The extent to which this effect influences cognitive load assessments is unclear. Particularly when students are required to assess cognitive load multiple times during problem-solving, they may resort to heuristics to simplify the cognitively demanding decision-making process. This experimental series aimed to investigate whether anchoring biases cognitive load assessments when students evaluated the cognitive load of several problem-solving tasks. Across three experiments (N<sub>1</sub> = 100, N<sub>2</sub> = 87, N<sub>3</sub> = 80) students assessed the cognitive load of tasks with varying levels of element interactivity (low, moderate, high) multiple times during problem solving. Task sequences were varied to examine whether the first impression of complexity influenced subsequent assessments. The results were mixed: In Experiments 1 and 2, the first impression did not influence the following assessment, but Experiment 3 confirmed the hypothesized anchoring effect. However, this finding cannot be solely attributed to anchoring, as several factors - such as subjective perceptions of complexity, scale effects, task-specific differences, and memory and consistency effects - may have contributed. The findings suggest that anchoring is more likely to occur when there is a substantial contrast between the anchor and subsequent assessments. Furthermore, objective anchors, such as pre-defined numerical values, may exert a stronger influence on decision-making processes than subjective ones, like self-generated assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How a first impression biases cognitive load assessments: Anchoring effects in problem-solving tasks of varying element interactivity.\",\"authors\":\"Felix Krieglstein, Manuel Schmitz, Lukas Wesenberg, Markus Wolfgang Hermann Spitzer, Günter Daniel Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13421-025-01764-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which people rely heavily on an initial piece of information when making judgments or decisions. Once an anchor - typically an objective numerical value - is set, subsequent assessments are adjusted around it, often insufficiently. The extent to which this effect influences cognitive load assessments is unclear. Particularly when students are required to assess cognitive load multiple times during problem-solving, they may resort to heuristics to simplify the cognitively demanding decision-making process. This experimental series aimed to investigate whether anchoring biases cognitive load assessments when students evaluated the cognitive load of several problem-solving tasks. Across three experiments (N<sub>1</sub> = 100, N<sub>2</sub> = 87, N<sub>3</sub> = 80) students assessed the cognitive load of tasks with varying levels of element interactivity (low, moderate, high) multiple times during problem solving. Task sequences were varied to examine whether the first impression of complexity influenced subsequent assessments. The results were mixed: In Experiments 1 and 2, the first impression did not influence the following assessment, but Experiment 3 confirmed the hypothesized anchoring effect. However, this finding cannot be solely attributed to anchoring, as several factors - such as subjective perceptions of complexity, scale effects, task-specific differences, and memory and consistency effects - may have contributed. The findings suggest that anchoring is more likely to occur when there is a substantial contrast between the anchor and subsequent assessments. Furthermore, objective anchors, such as pre-defined numerical values, may exert a stronger influence on decision-making processes than subjective ones, like self-generated assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01764-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01764-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

锚定效应是一种认知偏差,人们在做出判断或决定时严重依赖于最初的信息。一旦确定了一个锚点(通常是一个客观的数值),随后的评估就会围绕它进行调整,但往往不够充分。这种影响对认知负荷评估的影响程度尚不清楚。特别是当学生在解决问题的过程中被要求多次评估认知负荷时,他们可能会求助于启发式来简化认知要求高的决策过程。本系列实验旨在探讨锚定偏差是否会影响学生对若干问题解决任务的认知负荷评估。在三个实验中(N1 = 100, N2 = 87, N3 = 80),学生在解决问题的过程中多次评估具有不同水平的元素交互(低、中、高)的任务的认知负荷。改变任务顺序以检验复杂性的第一印象是否会影响随后的评估。结果好坏参半:在实验1和2中,第一印象不影响随后的评估,但实验3证实了假设的锚定效应。然而,这一发现不能仅仅归因于锚定,因为有几个因素——比如对复杂性的主观感知、规模效应、任务特定差异、记忆和一致性效应——可能起了作用。研究结果表明,锚定更有可能发生,当锚定和随后的评估之间有实质性的对比。此外,客观锚点,如预先定义的数值,可能比主观锚点,如自我生成的评估,对决策过程产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How a first impression biases cognitive load assessments: Anchoring effects in problem-solving tasks of varying element interactivity.

The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which people rely heavily on an initial piece of information when making judgments or decisions. Once an anchor - typically an objective numerical value - is set, subsequent assessments are adjusted around it, often insufficiently. The extent to which this effect influences cognitive load assessments is unclear. Particularly when students are required to assess cognitive load multiple times during problem-solving, they may resort to heuristics to simplify the cognitively demanding decision-making process. This experimental series aimed to investigate whether anchoring biases cognitive load assessments when students evaluated the cognitive load of several problem-solving tasks. Across three experiments (N1 = 100, N2 = 87, N3 = 80) students assessed the cognitive load of tasks with varying levels of element interactivity (low, moderate, high) multiple times during problem solving. Task sequences were varied to examine whether the first impression of complexity influenced subsequent assessments. The results were mixed: In Experiments 1 and 2, the first impression did not influence the following assessment, but Experiment 3 confirmed the hypothesized anchoring effect. However, this finding cannot be solely attributed to anchoring, as several factors - such as subjective perceptions of complexity, scale effects, task-specific differences, and memory and consistency effects - may have contributed. The findings suggest that anchoring is more likely to occur when there is a substantial contrast between the anchor and subsequent assessments. Furthermore, objective anchors, such as pre-defined numerical values, may exert a stronger influence on decision-making processes than subjective ones, like self-generated assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信