{"title":"韩国2021 - 2022年自动死因分类的机器学习:ICD-10预测模型的开发和验证","authors":"Seokmin Lee, Gyeongmin Im","doi":"10.12771/emj.2025.00675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and performance of a deep learning approach utilizing the Korean Medical BERT (KM-BERT) model for the automated classification of underlying causes of death within national mortality statistics. It aimed to assess predictive accuracy throughout the cause-of-death coding workflow and to identify limitations and opportunities for further artificial intelligence (AI) integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective prediction study using 693,587 death certificates issued in Korea between January 2021 and December 2022. Free-text fields for immediate, antecedent, and contributory causes were concatenated and fine-tuned with KM-BERT. Three classification models were developed: (1) final underlying cause prediction (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] code) from certificate inputs, (2) tentative underlying cause selection based on ICD-10 Volume 2 rules, and (3) classification of individual cause-of-death entries. Models were trained and validated using 2021 data (80% training, 20% validation) and evaluated on 2022 data. Performance metrics included overall accuracy, weighted F1 score, and macro F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 306,898 certificates from 2022, the final cause model achieved 62.65% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.5940; F1-macro, 0.1503). The tentative cause model demonstrated 95.35% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.9516; F1-macro, 0.4996). The individual entry model yielded 79.51% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.7741; F1-macro, 0.9250). Error analysis indicated reduced reliability for rare diseases and for specific ICD chapters, which require supplementary administrative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong performance in mapping free-text inputs and selecting tentative underlying causes, there remains a need for improved data quality, administrative record integration, and model refinement. A systematic, long-term approach is essential for the broad adoption of AI in mortality statistics.</p>","PeriodicalId":41392,"journal":{"name":"Ewha Medical Journal","volume":"48 3","pages":"e45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning for automated cause-of-death classification from 2021 to 2022 in Korea: development and validation of an ICD-10 prediction model.\",\"authors\":\"Seokmin Lee, Gyeongmin Im\",\"doi\":\"10.12771/emj.2025.00675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and performance of a deep learning approach utilizing the Korean Medical BERT (KM-BERT) model for the automated classification of underlying causes of death within national mortality statistics. It aimed to assess predictive accuracy throughout the cause-of-death coding workflow and to identify limitations and opportunities for further artificial intelligence (AI) integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective prediction study using 693,587 death certificates issued in Korea between January 2021 and December 2022. Free-text fields for immediate, antecedent, and contributory causes were concatenated and fine-tuned with KM-BERT. Three classification models were developed: (1) final underlying cause prediction (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] code) from certificate inputs, (2) tentative underlying cause selection based on ICD-10 Volume 2 rules, and (3) classification of individual cause-of-death entries. Models were trained and validated using 2021 data (80% training, 20% validation) and evaluated on 2022 data. Performance metrics included overall accuracy, weighted F1 score, and macro F1 score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 306,898 certificates from 2022, the final cause model achieved 62.65% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.5940; F1-macro, 0.1503). The tentative cause model demonstrated 95.35% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.9516; F1-macro, 0.4996). The individual entry model yielded 79.51% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.7741; F1-macro, 0.9250). Error analysis indicated reduced reliability for rare diseases and for specific ICD chapters, which require supplementary administrative data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite strong performance in mapping free-text inputs and selecting tentative underlying causes, there remains a need for improved data quality, administrative record integration, and model refinement. A systematic, long-term approach is essential for the broad adoption of AI in mortality statistics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ewha Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"e45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ewha Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2025.00675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ewha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2025.00675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning for automated cause-of-death classification from 2021 to 2022 in Korea: development and validation of an ICD-10 prediction model.
Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility and performance of a deep learning approach utilizing the Korean Medical BERT (KM-BERT) model for the automated classification of underlying causes of death within national mortality statistics. It aimed to assess predictive accuracy throughout the cause-of-death coding workflow and to identify limitations and opportunities for further artificial intelligence (AI) integration.
Methods: We performed a retrospective prediction study using 693,587 death certificates issued in Korea between January 2021 and December 2022. Free-text fields for immediate, antecedent, and contributory causes were concatenated and fine-tuned with KM-BERT. Three classification models were developed: (1) final underlying cause prediction (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] code) from certificate inputs, (2) tentative underlying cause selection based on ICD-10 Volume 2 rules, and (3) classification of individual cause-of-death entries. Models were trained and validated using 2021 data (80% training, 20% validation) and evaluated on 2022 data. Performance metrics included overall accuracy, weighted F1 score, and macro F1 score.
Results: On 306,898 certificates from 2022, the final cause model achieved 62.65% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.5940; F1-macro, 0.1503). The tentative cause model demonstrated 95.35% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.9516; F1-macro, 0.4996). The individual entry model yielded 79.51% accuracy (F1-weighted, 0.7741; F1-macro, 0.9250). Error analysis indicated reduced reliability for rare diseases and for specific ICD chapters, which require supplementary administrative data.
Conclusion: Despite strong performance in mapping free-text inputs and selecting tentative underlying causes, there remains a need for improved data quality, administrative record integration, and model refinement. A systematic, long-term approach is essential for the broad adoption of AI in mortality statistics.