针灸治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Liang Ding, Yan Xiao
{"title":"针灸治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Liang Ding, Yan Xiao","doi":"10.1177/27683605251363181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Obesity poses an important public health concern globally, requiring effective and safe interventions. Acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, is increasingly used to address various health conditions, including obesity. Previous systematic reviews have examined acupuncture for obesity, but none have comprehensively synthesized evidence from both English and non-English-language databases with rigorous methodological assessment. This review addresses this gap by providing an updated synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture's effectiveness and safety for obesity management. <b><i>Aim and Objectives:</i></b> The primary goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of various acupuncture treatments; it includes acupressure, auricular acupuncture, auricular acupressure, and more treatments for obesity. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether these acupuncture therapies are as effective as placebos or traditional treatments for weight loss. Additionally, we aimed to systematically assess the safety profile of acupuncture by examining the types and frequency of adverse events reported across trials. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database from inception to September 2024 without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included RCTs comparing acupuncture interventions (manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, or acupressure) with placebo, sham treatments, lifestyle interventions, or medications in adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 or ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for Asian populations). We excluded studies combining acupuncture with other therapies except diet, as diet modification is standard care for obesity. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 202 identified records, 20 RCTs (<i>n</i> = 2261 participants) met inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs with complete data were included in meta-analyses. Compared with lifestyle interventions, acupuncture resulted in additional weight loss of 1.72 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-2.93, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 20%, five studies, <i>n</i> = 237). Compared with placebo/sham treatments, acupuncture achieved greater weight reduction of 1.56 kg (95% CI: 0.78-2.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, eight studies, <i>n</i> = 412). When compared with medications, acupuncture showed superior weight loss of 3.0 kg (95% CI: 1.53-5.88, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 20%, two studies, <i>n</i> = 120). Risk ratios (RRs) for obesity remission favored acupuncture over lifestyle interventions (RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.98-3.34, six studies) and medications (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.12-7.20, four studies). Only one trial reported adverse events systematically, documenting mild effects in 16.7% of acupuncture participants versus 42.9% in the medication group. GRADE assessment indicated low to moderate certainty of evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Current evidence suggests acupuncture may provide modest benefits for weight loss compared with lifestyle interventions or placebo treatments, with a favorable safety profile compared with medications. However, the low to moderate certainty of evidence due to methodological limitations prevents definitive conclusions. Acupuncture should be considered as a complementary rather than primary intervention for obesity management, pending more rigorous research. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols, longer follow-up periods, and systematic adverse event reporting are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Ding, Yan Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27683605251363181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Obesity poses an important public health concern globally, requiring effective and safe interventions. Acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, is increasingly used to address various health conditions, including obesity. Previous systematic reviews have examined acupuncture for obesity, but none have comprehensively synthesized evidence from both English and non-English-language databases with rigorous methodological assessment. This review addresses this gap by providing an updated synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture's effectiveness and safety for obesity management. <b><i>Aim and Objectives:</i></b> The primary goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of various acupuncture treatments; it includes acupressure, auricular acupuncture, auricular acupressure, and more treatments for obesity. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether these acupuncture therapies are as effective as placebos or traditional treatments for weight loss. Additionally, we aimed to systematically assess the safety profile of acupuncture by examining the types and frequency of adverse events reported across trials. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database from inception to September 2024 without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included RCTs comparing acupuncture interventions (manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, or acupressure) with placebo, sham treatments, lifestyle interventions, or medications in adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 or ≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for Asian populations). We excluded studies combining acupuncture with other therapies except diet, as diet modification is standard care for obesity. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistics. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 202 identified records, 20 RCTs (<i>n</i> = 2261 participants) met inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs with complete data were included in meta-analyses. Compared with lifestyle interventions, acupuncture resulted in additional weight loss of 1.72 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-2.93, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 20%, five studies, <i>n</i> = 237). Compared with placebo/sham treatments, acupuncture achieved greater weight reduction of 1.56 kg (95% CI: 0.78-2.34, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, eight studies, <i>n</i> = 412). When compared with medications, acupuncture showed superior weight loss of 3.0 kg (95% CI: 1.53-5.88, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 20%, two studies, <i>n</i> = 120). Risk ratios (RRs) for obesity remission favored acupuncture over lifestyle interventions (RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.98-3.34, six studies) and medications (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.12-7.20, four studies). Only one trial reported adverse events systematically, documenting mild effects in 16.7% of acupuncture participants versus 42.9% in the medication group. GRADE assessment indicated low to moderate certainty of evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Current evidence suggests acupuncture may provide modest benefits for weight loss compared with lifestyle interventions or placebo treatments, with a favorable safety profile compared with medications. However, the low to moderate certainty of evidence due to methodological limitations prevents definitive conclusions. Acupuncture should be considered as a complementary rather than primary intervention for obesity management, pending more rigorous research. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols, longer follow-up periods, and systematic adverse event reporting are urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251363181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27683605251363181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖症是一个重要的全球公共卫生问题,需要有效和安全的干预措施。针灸,一种传统的中医疗法,越来越多地被用于治疗各种健康问题,包括肥胖。以前的系统综述研究了针灸治疗肥胖,但没有一个综合了英语和非英语数据库的证据,并进行了严格的方法学评估。本综述通过提供最新的随机对照试验(rct)来评估针灸治疗肥胖的有效性和安全性,从而弥补了这一空白。目的和目的:本研究的主要目的是评估各种针灸治疗的有效性;它包括穴位按压,耳针,耳穴按压,以及更多的肥胖治疗。具体来说,我们的目的是确定这些针灸疗法是否与安慰剂或传统减肥疗法一样有效。此外,我们的目的是通过检查试验中报告的不良事件的类型和频率来系统地评估针灸的安全性。方法:我们按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA) 2020指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。我们检索了PubMed, b谷歌Scholar, ISI Web of Science,中国知识基础设施,万方数据库和VIP数据库,从成立到2024年9月,没有语言限制。两位独立审稿人筛选了题目、摘要和全文。我们纳入了比较针灸干预(手工针灸、电针、激光针灸、耳针或指压)与安慰剂、假治疗、生活方式干预或药物治疗的随机对照试验,这些患者为肥胖成人(亚洲人群体重指数≥30或≥25 kg/m2)。我们排除了针灸与饮食以外的其他治疗相结合的研究,因为饮食调整是肥胖的标准治疗。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具2.0评估研究质量。meta分析采用RevMan 5.4中的随机效应模型。采用I2统计量评估异质性。采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。结果:在202份确定的记录中,20项rct (n = 2261名受试者)符合纳入标准。meta分析纳入15项数据完整的随机对照试验。与生活方式干预相比,针灸可使体重额外减轻1.72 kg(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.50-2.93, I2 = 20%, 5项研究,n = 237)。与安慰剂/假治疗相比,针灸获得了1.56 kg的更大体重减轻(95% CI: 0.78-2.34, I2 = 0%, 8项研究,n = 412)。与药物治疗相比,针灸的减重效果更好,为3.0 kg (95% CI: 1.53-5.88, I2 = 20%, 2项研究,n = 120)。肥胖缓解的风险比(RRs)倾向于针灸而不是生活方式干预(RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.98-3.34, 6项研究)和药物治疗(RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.12-7.20, 4项研究)。只有一项试验系统地报告了不良事件,记录了16.7%的针灸参与者的轻微影响,而42.9%的药物组。GRADE评估显示,由于存在偏倚和不精确的风险,证据的确定性为低至中等。结论:目前的证据表明,与生活方式干预或安慰剂治疗相比,针灸可能对减肥有一定的益处,与药物治疗相比,针灸具有良好的安全性。然而,由于方法学的限制,证据的低到中等确定性阻碍了明确的结论。针灸应被视为肥胖管理的一种补充而非主要干预措施,有待更严格的研究。迫切需要设计良好的随机对照试验,具有标准化的方案,更长的随访期和系统的不良事件报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Introduction: Obesity poses an important public health concern globally, requiring effective and safe interventions. Acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, is increasingly used to address various health conditions, including obesity. Previous systematic reviews have examined acupuncture for obesity, but none have comprehensively synthesized evidence from both English and non-English-language databases with rigorous methodological assessment. This review addresses this gap by providing an updated synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture's effectiveness and safety for obesity management. Aim and Objectives: The primary goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of various acupuncture treatments; it includes acupressure, auricular acupuncture, auricular acupressure, and more treatments for obesity. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether these acupuncture therapies are as effective as placebos or traditional treatments for weight loss. Additionally, we aimed to systematically assess the safety profile of acupuncture by examining the types and frequency of adverse events reported across trials. Method: We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database from inception to September 2024 without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included RCTs comparing acupuncture interventions (manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, or acupressure) with placebo, sham treatments, lifestyle interventions, or medications in adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 or ≥25 kg/m2 for Asian populations). We excluded studies combining acupuncture with other therapies except diet, as diet modification is standard care for obesity. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. Results: Of 202 identified records, 20 RCTs (n = 2261 participants) met inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs with complete data were included in meta-analyses. Compared with lifestyle interventions, acupuncture resulted in additional weight loss of 1.72 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-2.93, I2 = 20%, five studies, n = 237). Compared with placebo/sham treatments, acupuncture achieved greater weight reduction of 1.56 kg (95% CI: 0.78-2.34, I2 = 0%, eight studies, n = 412). When compared with medications, acupuncture showed superior weight loss of 3.0 kg (95% CI: 1.53-5.88, I2 = 20%, two studies, n = 120). Risk ratios (RRs) for obesity remission favored acupuncture over lifestyle interventions (RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.98-3.34, six studies) and medications (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.12-7.20, four studies). Only one trial reported adverse events systematically, documenting mild effects in 16.7% of acupuncture participants versus 42.9% in the medication group. GRADE assessment indicated low to moderate certainty of evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests acupuncture may provide modest benefits for weight loss compared with lifestyle interventions or placebo treatments, with a favorable safety profile compared with medications. However, the low to moderate certainty of evidence due to methodological limitations prevents definitive conclusions. Acupuncture should be considered as a complementary rather than primary intervention for obesity management, pending more rigorous research. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols, longer follow-up periods, and systematic adverse event reporting are urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信