人工智能辅助压缩感知CINE增强了心脏磁共振在挑战性患者中的工作流程。

IF 2.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Huaijun Wang, Anne Schmieder, Mary Watkins, Pengjun Wang, Joshua Mitchell, S Zyad Qamer, Gregory Lanza
{"title":"人工智能辅助压缩感知CINE增强了心脏磁共振在挑战性患者中的工作流程。","authors":"Huaijun Wang, Anne Schmieder, Mary Watkins, Pengjun Wang, Joshua Mitchell, S Zyad Qamer, Gregory Lanza","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.108745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) challenge is breath-holding duration, difficult for cardiac patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE (AI-CS-CINE) reduces image acquisition time of CMR compared to conventional CINE (C-CINE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardio-oncology patients (<i>n</i> = 60) and healthy volunteers (<i>n</i> = 29) underwent sequential C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with a 1.5-T scanner. Acquisition time, visual image quality assessment, and biventricular metrics (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, and wall thickness) were analyzed and compared between C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with Bland-Altman analysis, and calculation of intraclass coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 89 participants (58.5 ± 16.8 years, 42 males, 47 females), total AI-CS-CINE acquisition and reconstruction time (37 seconds) was 84% faster than C-CINE (238 seconds). C-CINE required repeats in 23% (20/89) of cases (approximately 8 minutes lost), while AI-CS-CINE only needed one repeat (1%; 2 seconds lost). AI-CS-CINE had slightly lower contrast but preserved structural clarity. Bland-Altman plots and ICC (0.73 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ 0.98) showed strong agreement for left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) metrics, including those in the cardiac amyloidosis subgroup (<i>n</i> = 31). AI-CS-CINE enabled faster, easier imaging in patients with claustrophobia, dyspnea, arrhythmias, or restlessness. Motion-artifacted C-CINE images were reliably interpreted from AI-CS-CINE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-CS-CINE accelerated CMR image acquisition and reconstruction, preserved anatomical detail, and diminished impact of patient-related motion. Quantitative AI-CS-CINE metrics agreed closely with C-CINE in cardio-oncology patients, including the cardiac amyloidosis cohort, as well as healthy volunteers regardless of left and right ventricular size and function. AI-CS-CINE significantly enhanced CMR workflow, particularly in challenging cases. The strong analytical concordance underscores reliability and robustness of AI-CS-CINE as a valuable tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"17 7","pages":"108745"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE enhances the workflow of cardiac magnetic resonance in challenging patients.\",\"authors\":\"Huaijun Wang, Anne Schmieder, Mary Watkins, Pengjun Wang, Joshua Mitchell, S Zyad Qamer, Gregory Lanza\",\"doi\":\"10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.108745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A key cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) challenge is breath-holding duration, difficult for cardiac patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE (AI-CS-CINE) reduces image acquisition time of CMR compared to conventional CINE (C-CINE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardio-oncology patients (<i>n</i> = 60) and healthy volunteers (<i>n</i> = 29) underwent sequential C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with a 1.5-T scanner. Acquisition time, visual image quality assessment, and biventricular metrics (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, and wall thickness) were analyzed and compared between C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with Bland-Altman analysis, and calculation of intraclass coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 89 participants (58.5 ± 16.8 years, 42 males, 47 females), total AI-CS-CINE acquisition and reconstruction time (37 seconds) was 84% faster than C-CINE (238 seconds). C-CINE required repeats in 23% (20/89) of cases (approximately 8 minutes lost), while AI-CS-CINE only needed one repeat (1%; 2 seconds lost). AI-CS-CINE had slightly lower contrast but preserved structural clarity. Bland-Altman plots and ICC (0.73 ≤ <i>r</i> ≤ 0.98) showed strong agreement for left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) metrics, including those in the cardiac amyloidosis subgroup (<i>n</i> = 31). AI-CS-CINE enabled faster, easier imaging in patients with claustrophobia, dyspnea, arrhythmias, or restlessness. Motion-artifacted C-CINE images were reliably interpreted from AI-CS-CINE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-CS-CINE accelerated CMR image acquisition and reconstruction, preserved anatomical detail, and diminished impact of patient-related motion. Quantitative AI-CS-CINE metrics agreed closely with C-CINE in cardio-oncology patients, including the cardiac amyloidosis cohort, as well as healthy volunteers regardless of left and right ventricular size and function. AI-CS-CINE significantly enhanced CMR workflow, particularly in challenging cases. The strong analytical concordance underscores reliability and robustness of AI-CS-CINE as a valuable tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"108745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.108745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i7.108745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏磁共振(CMR)的一个关键挑战是屏气时间,这对心脏病患者来说是一个难题。目的:评价人工智能辅助压缩感知CINE (AI-CS-CINE)与传统CINE (C-CINE)相比,是否能减少CMR图像采集时间。方法:心脏肿瘤患者(n = 60)和健康志愿者(n = 29)在1.5 t扫描仪下进行序贯C-CINE和AI-CS-CINE。采用Bland-Altman分析和类内系数(ICC)计算,对C-CINE和AI-CS-CINE的采集时间、视觉图像质量评估和双心室指标(舒张末期容积、收缩末期容积、卒中容积、射血分数、左心室质量和壁厚)进行分析和比较。结果:89名被试(58.5±16.8岁,男42人,女47人),AI-CS-CINE的总获取重建时间(37秒)比C-CINE(238秒)快84%。C-CINE在23%(20/89)的病例中需要重复(约8分钟损失),而AI-CS-CINE只需要重复一次(1%;损失2秒)。AI-CS-CINE的对比度略低,但保留了结构清晰度。Bland-Altman图和ICC(0.73≤r≤0.98)显示左心室(LV)和右心室(RV)指标非常一致,包括心脏淀粉样变性亚组(n = 31)。AI-CS-CINE使幽闭恐惧症、呼吸困难、心律失常或烦躁不安的患者更快、更容易成像。从AI-CS-CINE中可靠地解释了运动人造C-CINE图像。结论:AI-CS-CINE加速了CMR图像采集和重建,保留了解剖细节,减少了患者相关运动的影响。定量AI-CS-CINE指标与C-CINE在心脏肿瘤学患者(包括心脏淀粉样变性队列)以及健康志愿者(无论左心室和右心室大小和功能如何)中的一致。AI-CS-CINE显著增强了CMR工作流程,特别是在具有挑战性的病例中。强分析一致性强调了AI-CS-CINE作为一种有价值的工具的可靠性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE enhances the workflow of cardiac magnetic resonance in challenging patients.

Background: A key cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) challenge is breath-holding duration, difficult for cardiac patients.

Aim: To evaluate whether artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE (AI-CS-CINE) reduces image acquisition time of CMR compared to conventional CINE (C-CINE).

Methods: Cardio-oncology patients (n = 60) and healthy volunteers (n = 29) underwent sequential C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with a 1.5-T scanner. Acquisition time, visual image quality assessment, and biventricular metrics (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, stroke volume, ejection fraction, left ventricular mass, and wall thickness) were analyzed and compared between C-CINE and AI-CS-CINE with Bland-Altman analysis, and calculation of intraclass coefficient (ICC).

Results: In 89 participants (58.5 ± 16.8 years, 42 males, 47 females), total AI-CS-CINE acquisition and reconstruction time (37 seconds) was 84% faster than C-CINE (238 seconds). C-CINE required repeats in 23% (20/89) of cases (approximately 8 minutes lost), while AI-CS-CINE only needed one repeat (1%; 2 seconds lost). AI-CS-CINE had slightly lower contrast but preserved structural clarity. Bland-Altman plots and ICC (0.73 ≤ r ≤ 0.98) showed strong agreement for left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) metrics, including those in the cardiac amyloidosis subgroup (n = 31). AI-CS-CINE enabled faster, easier imaging in patients with claustrophobia, dyspnea, arrhythmias, or restlessness. Motion-artifacted C-CINE images were reliably interpreted from AI-CS-CINE.

Conclusion: AI-CS-CINE accelerated CMR image acquisition and reconstruction, preserved anatomical detail, and diminished impact of patient-related motion. Quantitative AI-CS-CINE metrics agreed closely with C-CINE in cardio-oncology patients, including the cardiac amyloidosis cohort, as well as healthy volunteers regardless of left and right ventricular size and function. AI-CS-CINE significantly enhanced CMR workflow, particularly in challenging cases. The strong analytical concordance underscores reliability and robustness of AI-CS-CINE as a valuable tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信