足底筋膜炎后浅肌筋膜释放的超声评价:一项单盲随机对照试验。

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.39.60
Seyed Mehdi Mohsenipour, Ali Amiri, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Farid Bahrpeyma
{"title":"足底筋膜炎后浅肌筋膜释放的超声评价:一项单盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Mohsenipour, Ali Amiri, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Farid Bahrpeyma","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myofascial tissues are interconnected, and fascia connects them to forming a web of myofascial chains. This research investigated whether incorporating myofascial release along the superficial backline offers additional benefits compared to a localized gastrocnemius release in managing clinical symptoms and plantar fascia thickness in individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an add-on design a single-blind randomized clinical trial that was conducted with 30 chronic plantar fasciitis patients. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the Gastrocnemius Myofascial Release (G-MFR) group and the Chain Myofascial Release (C-MFR) group. Each participant underwent four MFR sessions over two weeks. Outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), and ultrasound-based evaluations of plantar fascia thickness. Due to the non-normal distribution of change scores, between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, and effect sizes were reported using r values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in NPRS and FFI scores post-intervention (<i>P</i><0.001), with the C-MFR group showing greater reductions in both measures (for NPRS: <i>P</i>=0.004, r=0.686 and for FFI: <i>P</i>=0.004, r=0.518). However, while plantar fascia thickness decreased significantly in the C-MFR group (<i>P</i>=0.001, r=0.829), no significant change was observed in the G-MFR group (<i>P</i>=0.422, r=0.206). The reduction in thickness for C-MFR compared to G-MFR was not statistically significant (<i>P</i>=0.233, r=0.222).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that myofascial release in the superficial backline chain is more effective than isolated gastrocnemius release for improving NPRS and FFI scores in chronic plantar fasciitis. Future studies with longer follow-ups may clarify the long-term effects of these interventions on plantar fascia thickness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Mehdi Mohsenipour, Ali Amiri, Javad Sarrafzadeh, Farid Bahrpeyma\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.39.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myofascial tissues are interconnected, and fascia connects them to forming a web of myofascial chains. This research investigated whether incorporating myofascial release along the superficial backline offers additional benefits compared to a localized gastrocnemius release in managing clinical symptoms and plantar fascia thickness in individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an add-on design a single-blind randomized clinical trial that was conducted with 30 chronic plantar fasciitis patients. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the Gastrocnemius Myofascial Release (G-MFR) group and the Chain Myofascial Release (C-MFR) group. Each participant underwent four MFR sessions over two weeks. Outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), and ultrasound-based evaluations of plantar fascia thickness. Due to the non-normal distribution of change scores, between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, and effect sizes were reported using r values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant improvements in NPRS and FFI scores post-intervention (<i>P</i><0.001), with the C-MFR group showing greater reductions in both measures (for NPRS: <i>P</i>=0.004, r=0.686 and for FFI: <i>P</i>=0.004, r=0.518). However, while plantar fascia thickness decreased significantly in the C-MFR group (<i>P</i>=0.001, r=0.829), no significant change was observed in the G-MFR group (<i>P</i>=0.422, r=0.206). The reduction in thickness for C-MFR compared to G-MFR was not statistically significant (<i>P</i>=0.233, r=0.222).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that myofascial release in the superficial backline chain is more effective than isolated gastrocnemius release for improving NPRS and FFI scores in chronic plantar fasciitis. Future studies with longer follow-ups may clarify the long-term effects of these interventions on plantar fascia thickness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肌筋膜组织相互连接,筋膜将它们连接起来形成肌筋膜链网。本研究调查了在慢性足底筋膜炎患者的临床症状和足底筋膜厚度控制方面,与局部腓肠肌松解相比,沿浅表背部合并肌筋膜松解是否有额外的益处。方法:这是一项附加设计,对30例慢性足底筋膜炎患者进行了单盲随机临床试验。受试者随机分为两组:腓肠肌肌筋膜松解组(G-MFR)和链式肌筋膜松解组(C-MFR)。每位参与者在两周内接受了四次MFR治疗。结果测量包括数值疼痛评定量表(NPRS)、足功能指数(FFI)和基于超声的足底筋膜厚度评估。由于变化分数的非正态分布,组间比较使用Mann-Whitney检验和Hodges-Lehmann估计量进行,效应量使用r值报告。结果:两组干预后NPRS和FFI评分均有显著改善(PP=0.004, r=0.686; FFI评分P=0.004, r=0.518)。然而,C-MFR组足底筋膜厚度明显下降(P=0.001, r=0.829),而G-MFR组无明显变化(P=0.422, r=0.206)。与G-MFR相比,C-MFR的厚度减少无统计学意义(P=0.233, r=0.222)。结论:本研究提示,在改善慢性足底筋膜炎患者的NPRS和FFI评分方面,浅表后腰链肌筋膜释放比孤立腓肠肌释放更有效。未来的长期随访研究可能会阐明这些干预措施对足底筋膜厚度的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Myofascial tissues are interconnected, and fascia connects them to forming a web of myofascial chains. This research investigated whether incorporating myofascial release along the superficial backline offers additional benefits compared to a localized gastrocnemius release in managing clinical symptoms and plantar fascia thickness in individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis.

Methods: This was an add-on design a single-blind randomized clinical trial that was conducted with 30 chronic plantar fasciitis patients. Subjects were randomized into two groups: the Gastrocnemius Myofascial Release (G-MFR) group and the Chain Myofascial Release (C-MFR) group. Each participant underwent four MFR sessions over two weeks. Outcome measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), and ultrasound-based evaluations of plantar fascia thickness. Due to the non-normal distribution of change scores, between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test with the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, and effect sizes were reported using r values.

Results: Both groups exhibited significant improvements in NPRS and FFI scores post-intervention (P<0.001), with the C-MFR group showing greater reductions in both measures (for NPRS: P=0.004, r=0.686 and for FFI: P=0.004, r=0.518). However, while plantar fascia thickness decreased significantly in the C-MFR group (P=0.001, r=0.829), no significant change was observed in the G-MFR group (P=0.422, r=0.206). The reduction in thickness for C-MFR compared to G-MFR was not statistically significant (P=0.233, r=0.222).

Conclusion: This study suggests that myofascial release in the superficial backline chain is more effective than isolated gastrocnemius release for improving NPRS and FFI scores in chronic plantar fasciitis. Future studies with longer follow-ups may clarify the long-term effects of these interventions on plantar fascia thickness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信