开放性手术团队一致性对根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤和功能预后的影响。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Francis A. Jefferson MD, Stephen A. Boorjian MD, Prabin Thapa MS, Matthew K. Tollefson MD, Igor Frank MD, Matthew T. Gettman MD, R. Houston Thompson MD, R. Jeffrey Karnes MD, Brian J. Linder MD
{"title":"开放性手术团队一致性对根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤和功能预后的影响。","authors":"Francis A. Jefferson MD,&nbsp;Stephen A. Boorjian MD,&nbsp;Prabin Thapa MS,&nbsp;Matthew K. Tollefson MD,&nbsp;Igor Frank MD,&nbsp;Matthew T. Gettman MD,&nbsp;R. Houston Thompson MD,&nbsp;R. Jeffrey Karnes MD,&nbsp;Brian J. Linder MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of surgical team consistency on patient outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing RP at a single institution from 2010 to 2019 were identified. The surgical care team comprised three members: a certified surgical assistant, a certified surgical technologist, and a circulating nurse. Primary team member status for each of the three roles was assigned on a quarterly basis to team members who were present for the highest proportion of a surgeon’s cases. For each procedure, the surgical care team present at the time of the surgical timeout was assessed. Low-consistency teams were defined as those with zero to one primary team members present for a procedure, and high-consistency teams were defined as those with two to three primary team members present. Outcomes included prostate cancer recurrence as well as urinary continence and erectile function (assessed at 1 year after surgery). Cox-proportional hazard regression models evaluated the association of care team consistency with oncologic outcomes, controlling for clinicopathologic variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 4188 of 6216 (67.3%) RPs were performed with high-consistency teams. High-consistency surgical teams were associated with significantly improved 5-year prostate cancer recurrence-free survival (76% vs 72.9%; <em>P=</em>.009). On multivariable analysis, high-consistency teams remained significantly associated with a lower rate of prostate cancer recurrence (HR, 0.93; <em>P</em>=.01). One year postoperatively, high-consistency teams had significantly higher urinary continence rates (0-1 pads/d) (93.9% vs 90.3%; <em>P</em>&lt;.0001) and lower rates of erectile dysfunction (32.9% vs 35.2%; <em>P</em>=.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High-consistency surgical teams during RP are associated with significantly lower rates of prostate cancer recurrence and improved functional outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":"100 9","pages":"Pages 1487-1494"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Open Surgical Team Consistency on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Francis A. Jefferson MD,&nbsp;Stephen A. Boorjian MD,&nbsp;Prabin Thapa MS,&nbsp;Matthew K. Tollefson MD,&nbsp;Igor Frank MD,&nbsp;Matthew T. Gettman MD,&nbsp;R. Houston Thompson MD,&nbsp;R. Jeffrey Karnes MD,&nbsp;Brian J. Linder MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of surgical team consistency on patient outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP).</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing RP at a single institution from 2010 to 2019 were identified. The surgical care team comprised three members: a certified surgical assistant, a certified surgical technologist, and a circulating nurse. Primary team member status for each of the three roles was assigned on a quarterly basis to team members who were present for the highest proportion of a surgeon’s cases. For each procedure, the surgical care team present at the time of the surgical timeout was assessed. Low-consistency teams were defined as those with zero to one primary team members present for a procedure, and high-consistency teams were defined as those with two to three primary team members present. Outcomes included prostate cancer recurrence as well as urinary continence and erectile function (assessed at 1 year after surgery). Cox-proportional hazard regression models evaluated the association of care team consistency with oncologic outcomes, controlling for clinicopathologic variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 4188 of 6216 (67.3%) RPs were performed with high-consistency teams. High-consistency surgical teams were associated with significantly improved 5-year prostate cancer recurrence-free survival (76% vs 72.9%; <em>P=</em>.009). On multivariable analysis, high-consistency teams remained significantly associated with a lower rate of prostate cancer recurrence (HR, 0.93; <em>P</em>=.01). One year postoperatively, high-consistency teams had significantly higher urinary continence rates (0-1 pads/d) (93.9% vs 90.3%; <em>P</em>&lt;.0001) and lower rates of erectile dysfunction (32.9% vs 35.2%; <em>P</em>=.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High-consistency surgical teams during RP are associated with significantly lower rates of prostate cancer recurrence and improved functional outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings\",\"volume\":\"100 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1487-1494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619625001120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619625001120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价手术团队一致性对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)患者预后的影响。患者和方法:2010年至2019年在单一机构接受RP的患者被确定。手术护理小组由三名成员组成:一名持证外科助理、一名持证外科技师和一名循环护士。三个角色中的每个角色的主要团队成员身份按季度分配给出席外科医生病例比例最高的团队成员。对于每一个手术,手术暂停时在场的外科护理小组都进行了评估。低一致性团队被定义为那些有0到1个主要团队成员出席的团队,高一致性团队被定义为那些有2到3个主要团队成员出席的团队。结果包括前列腺癌复发、尿失禁和勃起功能(在手术后1年评估)。cox比例风险回归模型评估了护理团队一致性与肿瘤预后的关系,控制了临床病理变量。结果:总体而言,6216个rp中有4188个(67.3%)是由高一致性团队执行的。高一致性手术团队与显著提高的5年前列腺癌无复发生存率相关(76% vs 72.9%;P = .009)。在多变量分析中,高一致性团队与较低的前列腺癌复发率显著相关(HR, 0.93;P = . 01)。术后1年,高一致性组尿失禁率(0-1个尿垫/d)显著高于对照组(93.9% vs 90.3%;结论:RP期间高一致性的手术团队与前列腺癌复发率显著降低和功能预后改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Open Surgical Team Consistency on Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy

Objective

To evaluate the impact of surgical team consistency on patient outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients and Methods

Patients undergoing RP at a single institution from 2010 to 2019 were identified. The surgical care team comprised three members: a certified surgical assistant, a certified surgical technologist, and a circulating nurse. Primary team member status for each of the three roles was assigned on a quarterly basis to team members who were present for the highest proportion of a surgeon’s cases. For each procedure, the surgical care team present at the time of the surgical timeout was assessed. Low-consistency teams were defined as those with zero to one primary team members present for a procedure, and high-consistency teams were defined as those with two to three primary team members present. Outcomes included prostate cancer recurrence as well as urinary continence and erectile function (assessed at 1 year after surgery). Cox-proportional hazard regression models evaluated the association of care team consistency with oncologic outcomes, controlling for clinicopathologic variables.

Results

Overall, 4188 of 6216 (67.3%) RPs were performed with high-consistency teams. High-consistency surgical teams were associated with significantly improved 5-year prostate cancer recurrence-free survival (76% vs 72.9%; P=.009). On multivariable analysis, high-consistency teams remained significantly associated with a lower rate of prostate cancer recurrence (HR, 0.93; P=.01). One year postoperatively, high-consistency teams had significantly higher urinary continence rates (0-1 pads/d) (93.9% vs 90.3%; P<.0001) and lower rates of erectile dysfunction (32.9% vs 35.2%; P=.02).

Conclusion

High-consistency surgical teams during RP are associated with significantly lower rates of prostate cancer recurrence and improved functional outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings
Mayo Clinic proceedings 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信