Allyson N. Hamilton , Sahaana Chandran , Kristen E. Gibson , Juan Moreira
{"title":"农产品包装厂卫生专题分析:基于经营者和教育者见解的挑战和建议。","authors":"Allyson N. Hamilton , Sahaana Chandran , Kristen E. Gibson , Juan Moreira","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensuring food safety in produce packinghouses is vital for preventing foodborne illnesses and safeguarding public health. This study identifies cleaning and sanitation challenges within packinghouse environments through thematic analysis of interviews with produce safety educators (<em>N</em> = 21) and packinghouse operators (<em>N</em> = 15). Key challenges include resource limitations, knowledge gaps, outdated equipment, language barriers, and reluctance to invest in change. Small-scale growers often struggle with access to essential tools and supplies, while others may lack foundational knowledge regarding proper cleaning and sanitizing techniques. High employee turnover further complicates consistent training efforts. Language barriers hinder effective communication, particularly among non-English speaking workers and growers. In addition, reluctance or even the inability to invest in change can obstruct the adoption of improved practices. The study highlights specific contamination risks linked with common food-contact surfaces, such as wood, plastic, and stainless steel along with foam rollers, brushes, and rubber surfaces. Cleaning practices vary significantly, ranging from power washing and alcohol wipes to scrubbing with dish soap and steam cleaning. Sanitizers including chlorine, quaternary ammonium compounds, and peroxyacetic acid are frequently employed. Verification of cleaning effectiveness often relies on visual inspection rather than standardized methods such as environmental monitoring or Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) testing. Recommendations based on these findings include developing clear, accessible training materials, enhancing communication for consistent messaging regarding cleaning and sanitation practices, and investing in research for more effective cleaning technologies and durable food-contact surfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 9","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thematic Analysis of Produce Packinghouse Sanitation: Challenges and Recommendations Based on Operator and Educator Insights\",\"authors\":\"Allyson N. Hamilton , Sahaana Chandran , Kristen E. Gibson , Juan Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ensuring food safety in produce packinghouses is vital for preventing foodborne illnesses and safeguarding public health. This study identifies cleaning and sanitation challenges within packinghouse environments through thematic analysis of interviews with produce safety educators (<em>N</em> = 21) and packinghouse operators (<em>N</em> = 15). Key challenges include resource limitations, knowledge gaps, outdated equipment, language barriers, and reluctance to invest in change. Small-scale growers often struggle with access to essential tools and supplies, while others may lack foundational knowledge regarding proper cleaning and sanitizing techniques. High employee turnover further complicates consistent training efforts. Language barriers hinder effective communication, particularly among non-English speaking workers and growers. In addition, reluctance or even the inability to invest in change can obstruct the adoption of improved practices. The study highlights specific contamination risks linked with common food-contact surfaces, such as wood, plastic, and stainless steel along with foam rollers, brushes, and rubber surfaces. Cleaning practices vary significantly, ranging from power washing and alcohol wipes to scrubbing with dish soap and steam cleaning. Sanitizers including chlorine, quaternary ammonium compounds, and peroxyacetic acid are frequently employed. Verification of cleaning effectiveness often relies on visual inspection rather than standardized methods such as environmental monitoring or Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) testing. Recommendations based on these findings include developing clear, accessible training materials, enhancing communication for consistent messaging regarding cleaning and sanitation practices, and investing in research for more effective cleaning technologies and durable food-contact surfaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 100587\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001395\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thematic Analysis of Produce Packinghouse Sanitation: Challenges and Recommendations Based on Operator and Educator Insights
Ensuring food safety in produce packinghouses is vital for preventing foodborne illnesses and safeguarding public health. This study identifies cleaning and sanitation challenges within packinghouse environments through thematic analysis of interviews with produce safety educators (N = 21) and packinghouse operators (N = 15). Key challenges include resource limitations, knowledge gaps, outdated equipment, language barriers, and reluctance to invest in change. Small-scale growers often struggle with access to essential tools and supplies, while others may lack foundational knowledge regarding proper cleaning and sanitizing techniques. High employee turnover further complicates consistent training efforts. Language barriers hinder effective communication, particularly among non-English speaking workers and growers. In addition, reluctance or even the inability to invest in change can obstruct the adoption of improved practices. The study highlights specific contamination risks linked with common food-contact surfaces, such as wood, plastic, and stainless steel along with foam rollers, brushes, and rubber surfaces. Cleaning practices vary significantly, ranging from power washing and alcohol wipes to scrubbing with dish soap and steam cleaning. Sanitizers including chlorine, quaternary ammonium compounds, and peroxyacetic acid are frequently employed. Verification of cleaning effectiveness often relies on visual inspection rather than standardized methods such as environmental monitoring or Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) testing. Recommendations based on these findings include developing clear, accessible training materials, enhancing communication for consistent messaging regarding cleaning and sanitation practices, and investing in research for more effective cleaning technologies and durable food-contact surfaces.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.