与免疫检查点抑制剂相关和无关的中毒性表皮坏死松解治疗差异

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Fumika Minakawa, Nozomi Yanagida, Seiko Sugiyama, Yoichiro Toi, Yosuke Urakami, Daigo Oka, Ryo Tanaka, Takenobu Yamamoto, Yumi Aoyama
{"title":"与免疫检查点抑制剂相关和无关的中毒性表皮坏死松解治疗差异","authors":"Fumika Minakawa, Nozomi Yanagida, Seiko Sugiyama, Yoichiro Toi, Yosuke Urakami, Daigo Oka, Ryo Tanaka, Takenobu Yamamoto, Yumi Aoyama","doi":"10.1684/ejd.2025.4915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are currently no reliable biomarkers to predict the occurrence of severe complications and treatment response in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related TEN (irTEN) is much rarer than typical TEN, but mortality rates associated with irTEN are much higher than those for TEN. TEN and irTEN should therefore be managed in a different manner. To investigate biomarkers that could be used to predict outcomes and therapeutic efficacy associated with irTEN and TEN. Seven patients with TEN and two patients with irTEN were included in the study. The seven patients with TEN were treated with varying combinations and sequences of high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, pulse corticosteroids and plasma pheresis. Four of the seven TEN patients developed severe complications, and one patient eventually died due to cytomegalovirus disease. We found that, for TEN, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline was associated later onset of severe complications, and a subsequent decrease in NLR after starting immunosuppressive therapy was associated with a beneficial treatment response. In contrast, the opposite was found for the two irTEN patients; a low NLR at baseline and an increase in NLR after starting treatment were associated with poor outcome and a beneficial treatment response, respectively. The NLR may be differentially used as a practical and cost-efficient biomarker to predict treatment response and disease outcomes in patients with TEN and irTEN.</p>","PeriodicalId":11968,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dermatology","volume":"35 3","pages":"224-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis related and unrelated to immune checkpoint inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Fumika Minakawa, Nozomi Yanagida, Seiko Sugiyama, Yoichiro Toi, Yosuke Urakami, Daigo Oka, Ryo Tanaka, Takenobu Yamamoto, Yumi Aoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/ejd.2025.4915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are currently no reliable biomarkers to predict the occurrence of severe complications and treatment response in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related TEN (irTEN) is much rarer than typical TEN, but mortality rates associated with irTEN are much higher than those for TEN. TEN and irTEN should therefore be managed in a different manner. To investigate biomarkers that could be used to predict outcomes and therapeutic efficacy associated with irTEN and TEN. Seven patients with TEN and two patients with irTEN were included in the study. The seven patients with TEN were treated with varying combinations and sequences of high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, pulse corticosteroids and plasma pheresis. Four of the seven TEN patients developed severe complications, and one patient eventually died due to cytomegalovirus disease. We found that, for TEN, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline was associated later onset of severe complications, and a subsequent decrease in NLR after starting immunosuppressive therapy was associated with a beneficial treatment response. In contrast, the opposite was found for the two irTEN patients; a low NLR at baseline and an increase in NLR after starting treatment were associated with poor outcome and a beneficial treatment response, respectively. The NLR may be differentially used as a practical and cost-efficient biomarker to predict treatment response and disease outcomes in patients with TEN and irTEN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"224-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2025.4915\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2025.4915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还没有可靠的生物标志物来预测中毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)患者严重并发症的发生和治疗反应。免疫检查点抑制剂相关的TEN (irTEN)比典型的TEN罕见得多,但与irTEN相关的死亡率远高于TEN。因此,应以不同的方式管理十国和国际十国。研究可用于预测与irTEN和TEN相关的预后和治疗效果的生物标志物。7例TEN患者和2例irTEN患者被纳入研究。7例TEN患者采用不同组合和顺序的高剂量皮质类固醇、静脉注射免疫球蛋白、脉冲皮质类固醇和血浆穿刺治疗。7例10例患者中有4例出现严重并发症,1例患者最终死于巨细胞病毒病。我们发现,对于TEN,基线时高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)与严重并发症的后期发病相关,并且在开始免疫抑制治疗后NLR的随后降低与有益的治疗反应相关。相比之下,两个irTEN患者的情况正好相反;基线时较低的NLR和开始治疗后NLR的增加分别与不良结果和有益的治疗反应相关。NLR可作为一种实用且具有成本效益的生物标志物,用于预测TEN和irTEN患者的治疗反应和疾病结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in the management of toxic epidermal necrolysis related and unrelated to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

There are currently no reliable biomarkers to predict the occurrence of severe complications and treatment response in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related TEN (irTEN) is much rarer than typical TEN, but mortality rates associated with irTEN are much higher than those for TEN. TEN and irTEN should therefore be managed in a different manner. To investigate biomarkers that could be used to predict outcomes and therapeutic efficacy associated with irTEN and TEN. Seven patients with TEN and two patients with irTEN were included in the study. The seven patients with TEN were treated with varying combinations and sequences of high-dose corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, pulse corticosteroids and plasma pheresis. Four of the seven TEN patients developed severe complications, and one patient eventually died due to cytomegalovirus disease. We found that, for TEN, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline was associated later onset of severe complications, and a subsequent decrease in NLR after starting immunosuppressive therapy was associated with a beneficial treatment response. In contrast, the opposite was found for the two irTEN patients; a low NLR at baseline and an increase in NLR after starting treatment were associated with poor outcome and a beneficial treatment response, respectively. The NLR may be differentially used as a practical and cost-efficient biomarker to predict treatment response and disease outcomes in patients with TEN and irTEN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dermatology
European Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dermatology is an internationally renowned journal for dermatologists and scientists involved in clinical dermatology and skin biology. Original articles on clinical dermatology, skin biology, immunology and cell biology are published, along with review articles, which offer readers a broader view of the available literature. Each issue also has an important correspondence section, which contains brief clinical and investigative reports and letters concerning articles previously published in the EJD. The policy of the EJD is to bring together a large network of specialists from all over the world through a series of editorial offices in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信