联合检测血清降钙素原和c反应蛋白在细菌性和病毒性肺炎早期鉴别诊断中的临床疗效及相关炎症反应机制分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biomarkers in medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1080/17520363.2025.2538428
Rong Yu, Tang Yan, Jing He, Yuezi Hu, Hua Tang
{"title":"联合检测血清降钙素原和c反应蛋白在细菌性和病毒性肺炎早期鉴别诊断中的临床疗效及相关炎症反应机制分析","authors":"Rong Yu, Tang Yan, Jing He, Yuezi Hu, Hua Tang","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2025.2538428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early distinction of bacterial etiology from viral causes represents a cornerstone for rational antimicrobial therapy. Through evaluation of dual-biomarker strategies, this investigation examined the diagnostic utility of simultaneous PCT and CRP measurement while elucidating underlying inflammatory pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis encompassed 284 patients diagnosed with pneumonia (bacterial: <i>n</i> = 162, viral: <i>n</i> = 122) hospitalized during January 2023 through December 2024. Laboratory parameters including PCT, CRP, leukocyte counts, neutrophil proportions, IL-6, and TNF-α underwent comprehensive measurement. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through ROC analysis, with severity correlations systematically assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marked increases in inflammatory markers characterized the bacterial cohort (all parameters <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among single biomarkers, PCT demonstrated superior diagnostic capability (AUC = 0.892). When combined measurement was employed, PCT+CRP yielded optimal performance (AUC = 0.943, sensitivity 92.6%, specificity 89.3%). Positive correlations emerged between biomarker concentrations and clinical severity scores (PCT: <i>r</i> = 0.782, CRP: <i>r</i> = 0.743, both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Following multivariate adjustment, concurrent elevation of both markers emerged as the strongest independent correlate of bacterial etiology (OR = 8.74, 95% CI: 5.26-14.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synergistic assessment of PCT with CRP surpasses individual marker performance for bacterial-viral pneumonia discrimination, capturing differential inflammatory cascades and severity stratification. This dual-biomarker strategy optimizes therapeutic decisions and antimicrobial governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"657-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy of combined detection of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in early differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral pneumonia and analysis of related inflammatory response mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Rong Yu, Tang Yan, Jing He, Yuezi Hu, Hua Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17520363.2025.2538428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early distinction of bacterial etiology from viral causes represents a cornerstone for rational antimicrobial therapy. Through evaluation of dual-biomarker strategies, this investigation examined the diagnostic utility of simultaneous PCT and CRP measurement while elucidating underlying inflammatory pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis encompassed 284 patients diagnosed with pneumonia (bacterial: <i>n</i> = 162, viral: <i>n</i> = 122) hospitalized during January 2023 through December 2024. Laboratory parameters including PCT, CRP, leukocyte counts, neutrophil proportions, IL-6, and TNF-α underwent comprehensive measurement. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through ROC analysis, with severity correlations systematically assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marked increases in inflammatory markers characterized the bacterial cohort (all parameters <i>p</i> < 0.001). Among single biomarkers, PCT demonstrated superior diagnostic capability (AUC = 0.892). When combined measurement was employed, PCT+CRP yielded optimal performance (AUC = 0.943, sensitivity 92.6%, specificity 89.3%). Positive correlations emerged between biomarker concentrations and clinical severity scores (PCT: <i>r</i> = 0.782, CRP: <i>r</i> = 0.743, both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Following multivariate adjustment, concurrent elevation of both markers emerged as the strongest independent correlate of bacterial etiology (OR = 8.74, 95% CI: 5.26-14.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synergistic assessment of PCT with CRP surpasses individual marker performance for bacterial-viral pneumonia discrimination, capturing differential inflammatory cascades and severity stratification. This dual-biomarker strategy optimizes therapeutic decisions and antimicrobial governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"657-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2538428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2538428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期区分细菌病因和病毒病因是合理抗菌药物治疗的基础。通过评估双生物标志物策略,本研究在阐明潜在炎症途径的同时,检验了PCT和CRP同时测量的诊断效用。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月至2024年12月住院的284例确诊为肺炎的患者(细菌性:162例,病毒性:122例)。综合测量PCT、CRP、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例、IL-6、TNF-α等实验室参数。通过ROC分析评估诊断准确性,并系统评估严重程度相关性。结果:炎症标志物的显著增加是细菌队列的特征(所有参数p r = 0.782, CRP: r = 0.743,两者p p)。结论:PCT与CRP的协同评估在区分细菌-病毒性肺炎、捕捉不同的炎症级联和严重程度分层方面优于个体标志物的表现。这种双生物标志物策略优化了治疗决策和抗菌治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy of combined detection of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in early differential diagnosis of bacterial and viral pneumonia and analysis of related inflammatory response mechanisms.

Background: Early distinction of bacterial etiology from viral causes represents a cornerstone for rational antimicrobial therapy. Through evaluation of dual-biomarker strategies, this investigation examined the diagnostic utility of simultaneous PCT and CRP measurement while elucidating underlying inflammatory pathways.

Methods: A retrospective analysis encompassed 284 patients diagnosed with pneumonia (bacterial: n = 162, viral: n = 122) hospitalized during January 2023 through December 2024. Laboratory parameters including PCT, CRP, leukocyte counts, neutrophil proportions, IL-6, and TNF-α underwent comprehensive measurement. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through ROC analysis, with severity correlations systematically assessed.

Results: Marked increases in inflammatory markers characterized the bacterial cohort (all parameters p < 0.001). Among single biomarkers, PCT demonstrated superior diagnostic capability (AUC = 0.892). When combined measurement was employed, PCT+CRP yielded optimal performance (AUC = 0.943, sensitivity 92.6%, specificity 89.3%). Positive correlations emerged between biomarker concentrations and clinical severity scores (PCT: r = 0.782, CRP: r = 0.743, both p < 0.001). Following multivariate adjustment, concurrent elevation of both markers emerged as the strongest independent correlate of bacterial etiology (OR = 8.74, 95% CI: 5.26-14.53, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The synergistic assessment of PCT with CRP surpasses individual marker performance for bacterial-viral pneumonia discrimination, capturing differential inflammatory cascades and severity stratification. This dual-biomarker strategy optimizes therapeutic decisions and antimicrobial governance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in medicine
Biomarkers in medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory. Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice. As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications. Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest. Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信