2019冠状病毒病大流行期间英国认知未受影响老年人的技术准备程度:对分散的阿尔茨海默病预防试验的潜在影响

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
S Taylor, L Dunn, C Udeh-Momoh, K Abbott, P Giannakopoulou, L Middleton, O Robinson, J Kalsi, D Kafetsouli, J Ford
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间英国认知未受影响老年人的技术准备程度:对分散的阿尔茨海默病预防试验的潜在影响","authors":"S Taylor, L Dunn, C Udeh-Momoh, K Abbott, P Giannakopoulou, L Middleton, O Robinson, J Kalsi, D Kafetsouli, J Ford","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06158-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a global health and socioeconomic burden. Telemedicine has been more widely used since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be an effective strategy to mitigate the rising costs associated with AD. This study aimed to assess technology readiness among older adults at risk of developing dementia, with the goal of informing the design and delivery of technology-based approaches in AD prevention research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitively unaffected older adults (n = 226) from the CHARIOT PRO Substudy were invited to complete the CHARIOT Technology Questionnaire (CTQ). CTQ assessed technology experiences and attitudes, including 'technology readiness' via the Technology Readiness Index (TRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female participants scored, on average, lower TRI (M = 27.50, SD = 6.87) compared to males (M = 29.50, SD = 6.02). Furthermore, age predicted levels of technology readiness. Exploratory factor analysis determined two factors: \"Technology Competence\" (Factor 1) and \"Technology Trepidation\" (Factor 2). Gender differences were found for \"Technology Competence\" (but not \"Technology Trepidation\"), and age predicted \"Technology Trepidation\" (but not \"Technology Competence\").</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Differences in gender, age, \"Technology Competence\", and \"Technology Trepidation\" may highlight those who need additional study and/or support in remote-based AD dementia prevention trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 has accelerated our adoption of 'digitalisation' in AD dementia research. A deeper understanding of the barriers to technology readiness may help inform future AD research studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The CHARIOT PRO SubStudy is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02114372).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology readiness among UK-based cognitively unaffected older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: potential implications for decentralised alzheimer's disease prevention trials.\",\"authors\":\"S Taylor, L Dunn, C Udeh-Momoh, K Abbott, P Giannakopoulou, L Middleton, O Robinson, J Kalsi, D Kafetsouli, J Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12877-025-06158-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a global health and socioeconomic burden. Telemedicine has been more widely used since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be an effective strategy to mitigate the rising costs associated with AD. This study aimed to assess technology readiness among older adults at risk of developing dementia, with the goal of informing the design and delivery of technology-based approaches in AD prevention research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cognitively unaffected older adults (n = 226) from the CHARIOT PRO Substudy were invited to complete the CHARIOT Technology Questionnaire (CTQ). CTQ assessed technology experiences and attitudes, including 'technology readiness' via the Technology Readiness Index (TRI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female participants scored, on average, lower TRI (M = 27.50, SD = 6.87) compared to males (M = 29.50, SD = 6.02). Furthermore, age predicted levels of technology readiness. Exploratory factor analysis determined two factors: \\\"Technology Competence\\\" (Factor 1) and \\\"Technology Trepidation\\\" (Factor 2). Gender differences were found for \\\"Technology Competence\\\" (but not \\\"Technology Trepidation\\\"), and age predicted \\\"Technology Trepidation\\\" (but not \\\"Technology Competence\\\").</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Differences in gender, age, \\\"Technology Competence\\\", and \\\"Technology Trepidation\\\" may highlight those who need additional study and/or support in remote-based AD dementia prevention trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>COVID-19 has accelerated our adoption of 'digitalisation' in AD dementia research. A deeper understanding of the barriers to technology readiness may help inform future AD research studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The CHARIOT PRO SubStudy is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02114372).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312505/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06158-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06158-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)仍然是全球健康和社会经济负担。自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,远程医疗得到了更广泛的应用,可能是缓解AD相关成本上升的有效策略。本研究旨在评估有患痴呆症风险的老年人的技术准备情况,目的是为阿尔茨海默病预防研究中基于技术的方法的设计和交付提供信息。方法:从战车PRO子研究中邀请认知未受影响的老年人(n = 226)完成战车技术问卷(CTQ)。CTQ通过技术准备指数(TRI)评估技术经验和态度,包括“技术准备”。结果:女性参与者的平均TRI得分(M = 27.50, SD = 6.87)低于男性(M = 29.50, SD = 6.02)。此外,年龄可以预测技术准备程度。探索性因子分析确定了两个因素:“技术能力”(因子1)和“技术恐惧”(因子2)。在“技术能力”(而不是“技术恐惧”)上发现了性别差异,年龄预测了“技术恐惧”(而不是“技术能力”)。讨论:性别、年龄、“技术能力”和“技术恐惧”的差异可能会突出那些在远程AD痴呆预防试验中需要额外研究和/或支持的人。结论:COVID-19加速了我们在阿尔茨海默病研究中采用“数字化”。对技术准备障碍的深入了解可能有助于为未来的AD研究提供信息。试验注册:战车PRO子研究已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT02114372)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology readiness among UK-based cognitively unaffected older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: potential implications for decentralised alzheimer's disease prevention trials.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a global health and socioeconomic burden. Telemedicine has been more widely used since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be an effective strategy to mitigate the rising costs associated with AD. This study aimed to assess technology readiness among older adults at risk of developing dementia, with the goal of informing the design and delivery of technology-based approaches in AD prevention research.

Methods: Cognitively unaffected older adults (n = 226) from the CHARIOT PRO Substudy were invited to complete the CHARIOT Technology Questionnaire (CTQ). CTQ assessed technology experiences and attitudes, including 'technology readiness' via the Technology Readiness Index (TRI).

Results: Female participants scored, on average, lower TRI (M = 27.50, SD = 6.87) compared to males (M = 29.50, SD = 6.02). Furthermore, age predicted levels of technology readiness. Exploratory factor analysis determined two factors: "Technology Competence" (Factor 1) and "Technology Trepidation" (Factor 2). Gender differences were found for "Technology Competence" (but not "Technology Trepidation"), and age predicted "Technology Trepidation" (but not "Technology Competence").

Discussion: Differences in gender, age, "Technology Competence", and "Technology Trepidation" may highlight those who need additional study and/or support in remote-based AD dementia prevention trials.

Conclusions: COVID-19 has accelerated our adoption of 'digitalisation' in AD dementia research. A deeper understanding of the barriers to technology readiness may help inform future AD research studies.

Trial registration: The CHARIOT PRO SubStudy is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02114372).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信