肝切除术后预防性引流相关的创伤性并发症:一项荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zhenhao Fei, Xingfu Duan, Junhua Liang, Zhiwei Sun, Jianzhong Tang
{"title":"肝切除术后预防性引流相关的创伤性并发症:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Zhenhao Fei, Xingfu Duan, Junhua Liang, Zhiwei Sun, Jianzhong Tang","doi":"10.17219/acem/201227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research documenting the results of liver trauma surgery revealed a connection between prophylactic drainage (PD) and escalating infections or septic consequences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Meta-analysis research was conducted to review the wound complications (WCs) frequency of PD in liver resections (LRs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Up until June 2024, comprehensive literature study was completed, and 757 related studies were reviewed. The 10 selected studies included 5,459 LRs at the beginning; 2,918 of them were drained and 2,541 were not. The dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model were used to assess the WCs frequency of PD in LRs using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prophylactic drainage had significantly higher surgical site wound infection rate (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.09-3.55, p = 0.02) compared to non-PD in in LR patients, though no significant difference was found among PD and non-PD in LR patients in infected intra-abdominal collections (IIACs; OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 0.93-10.80, p = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic drainage had a considerably greater surgical site wound infection rate, and there was no discernible difference between IIACs and non-PD in LR individuals. Nevertheless, because there were not many studies nominated for comparison in the meta-analysis, care must be used when working with its outcomes, and further research is warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traumatic complications linked to prophylactic drain placement after hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenhao Fei, Xingfu Duan, Junhua Liang, Zhiwei Sun, Jianzhong Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/201227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research documenting the results of liver trauma surgery revealed a connection between prophylactic drainage (PD) and escalating infections or septic consequences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Meta-analysis research was conducted to review the wound complications (WCs) frequency of PD in liver resections (LRs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Up until June 2024, comprehensive literature study was completed, and 757 related studies were reviewed. The 10 selected studies included 5,459 LRs at the beginning; 2,918 of them were drained and 2,541 were not. The dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model were used to assess the WCs frequency of PD in LRs using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prophylactic drainage had significantly higher surgical site wound infection rate (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.09-3.55, p = 0.02) compared to non-PD in in LR patients, though no significant difference was found among PD and non-PD in LR patients in infected intra-abdominal collections (IIACs; OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 0.93-10.80, p = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic drainage had a considerably greater surgical site wound infection rate, and there was no discernible difference between IIACs and non-PD in LR individuals. Nevertheless, because there were not many studies nominated for comparison in the meta-analysis, care must be used when working with its outcomes, and further research is warranted to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/201227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/201227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:记录肝外伤手术结果的研究揭示了预防性引流(PD)与不断升级的感染或脓毒性后果之间的联系。目的:对肝切除(LRs) PD术后伤口并发症(WCs)发生率进行meta分析。材料与方法:截止2024年6月,完成了全面的文献研究,查阅了757篇相关研究。入选的10项研究在开始时包括5459例LRs;其中2918人被抽干,2541人没有。采用二分法和固定或随机模型,使用比值比(or)和95%置信区间(95% ci)评估LRs中PD的WCs频率。结果:预防性引流术明显高于手术部位伤口感染率(OR = 1.97;95% CI: 1.09-3.55, p = 0.02)与LR患者的非PD相比,尽管在腹腔内收集感染的LR患者中PD和非PD之间没有显着差异(IIACs;Or = 3.17;95% CI: 0.93-10.80, p = 0.07)。结论:预防性引流术的手术部位伤口感染率明显高于非pd患者,且iiac患者与非pd患者之间无明显差异。然而,由于在荟萃分析中没有很多研究被提名用于比较,因此在处理其结果时必须谨慎,并且需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traumatic complications linked to prophylactic drain placement after hepatectomy: A meta-analysis.

Background: Research documenting the results of liver trauma surgery revealed a connection between prophylactic drainage (PD) and escalating infections or septic consequences.

Objectives: Meta-analysis research was conducted to review the wound complications (WCs) frequency of PD in liver resections (LRs).

Material and methods: Up until June 2024, comprehensive literature study was completed, and 757 related studies were reviewed. The 10 selected studies included 5,459 LRs at the beginning; 2,918 of them were drained and 2,541 were not. The dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model were used to assess the WCs frequency of PD in LRs using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Prophylactic drainage had significantly higher surgical site wound infection rate (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.09-3.55, p = 0.02) compared to non-PD in in LR patients, though no significant difference was found among PD and non-PD in LR patients in infected intra-abdominal collections (IIACs; OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 0.93-10.80, p = 0.07).

Conclusion: Prophylactic drainage had a considerably greater surgical site wound infection rate, and there was no discernible difference between IIACs and non-PD in LR individuals. Nevertheless, because there were not many studies nominated for comparison in the meta-analysis, care must be used when working with its outcomes, and further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信