正确快速地解读心电图很重要:我们知道如何做心电图吗?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hasan Sarı, Ayşe Uçar, Serhat Kesriklioğlu, Memduha Sarı, Ahmet Lütfü Sertdemir
{"title":"正确快速地解读心电图很重要:我们知道如何做心电图吗?","authors":"Hasan Sarı, Ayşe Uçar, Serhat Kesriklioğlu, Memduha Sarı, Ahmet Lütfü Sertdemir","doi":"10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrocardiography (ECG) plays a pivotal role in diagnosing certain cardiac pathologies. Interpreters receive significant training in this area; however, an electrocardiogram must be performed correctly for accurate interpretation. It should also be recorded and interpreted swiftly. The aim of this study was to assess the level of technical knowledge regarding ECG performance among healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between June 2023 and September 2023. A total of 243 participants, including nurses, doctors, and medical and nursing faculty students, were enrolled. The participants were asked 16 questions via a Google survey. The participants were statistically compared based on their professions and workplaces.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships between the descriptive characteristics of the participants and electrocardiography knowledge scores were not statistically significant in terms of age, gender, employment status, or duration of employment (p > 0.05). However, medical faculty students had significantly higher ECG knowledge scores compared to nurses (p < 0.01). Among the nurses, those working in surgical units had significantly lower scores than those working in internal medicine and pediatric units (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, 16 questions were used to evaluate ECG acquisition knowledge. The ECG knowledge scores of the participants ranged between 0-14 and the mean score was 6.95 ± 3.13, which is quite low for a simple and applicable test. A simple mistake or delay in performing an electrocardiogram can lead to catastrophic consequences. Although nurses are the primary personnel performing ECG, their technical knowledge in performing the procedure was not as proficient as doctors. Some areas of focus may lead to errors. Although research has consistently focused on interpreting ECG, we still do not know how to perform ECG properly. More emphasis should be placed on ECG training, with the potential for regular training throughout the year as needed. These simple and preventable errors can be more easily overcome with artificial intelligence-supported programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":6957,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","volume":"41 4","pages":"501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It is Important to be Able to Interpret an ECG Correctly and Quickly: Do We Know How to Perform an ECG?\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Sarı, Ayşe Uçar, Serhat Kesriklioğlu, Memduha Sarı, Ahmet Lütfü Sertdemir\",\"doi\":\"10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrocardiography (ECG) plays a pivotal role in diagnosing certain cardiac pathologies. Interpreters receive significant training in this area; however, an electrocardiogram must be performed correctly for accurate interpretation. It should also be recorded and interpreted swiftly. The aim of this study was to assess the level of technical knowledge regarding ECG performance among healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted between June 2023 and September 2023. A total of 243 participants, including nurses, doctors, and medical and nursing faculty students, were enrolled. The participants were asked 16 questions via a Google survey. The participants were statistically compared based on their professions and workplaces.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships between the descriptive characteristics of the participants and electrocardiography knowledge scores were not statistically significant in terms of age, gender, employment status, or duration of employment (p > 0.05). However, medical faculty students had significantly higher ECG knowledge scores compared to nurses (p < 0.01). Among the nurses, those working in surgical units had significantly lower scores than those working in internal medicine and pediatric units (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, 16 questions were used to evaluate ECG acquisition knowledge. The ECG knowledge scores of the participants ranged between 0-14 and the mean score was 6.95 ± 3.13, which is quite low for a simple and applicable test. A simple mistake or delay in performing an electrocardiogram can lead to catastrophic consequences. Although nurses are the primary personnel performing ECG, their technical knowledge in performing the procedure was not as proficient as doctors. Some areas of focus may lead to errors. Although research has consistently focused on interpreting ECG, we still do not know how to perform ECG properly. More emphasis should be placed on ECG training, with the potential for regular training throughout the year as needed. These simple and preventable errors can be more easily overcome with artificial intelligence-supported programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"501-509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305837/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cardiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324B\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cardiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.202507_41(4).20250324B","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心电图(ECG)在诊断某些心脏疾病中起着关键作用。口译员接受这方面的重要培训;然而,心电图必须正确执行,以获得准确的解释。它也应该被迅速记录和解释。本研究的目的是评估医疗保健专业人员对心电图表现的技术知识水平。方法:研究时间为2023年6月至2023年9月。共有243名参与者,包括护士、医生、医学和护理专业的学生。参与者在谷歌调查中被问及16个问题。研究人员根据参与者的职业和工作场所对他们进行了统计比较。结果:受试者描述性特征与心电图知识得分在年龄、性别、就业状况、工作年限方面的关系均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。医学生的心电图知识得分明显高于护士(p < 0.01)。在护士中,外科护士得分显著低于内科和儿科护士(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究采用16道题对心电采集知识进行评价。参与者的心电图知识得分在0-14分之间,平均得分为6.95±3.13分,对于一项简单适用的测试来说,这是相当低的。一个简单的错误或延迟执行心电图可能导致灾难性的后果。虽然护士是执行心电图的主要人员,但他们在执行过程中的技术知识不如医生熟练。一些重点领域可能会导致错误。虽然研究一直集中在心电图的解读上,但我们仍然不知道如何正确地执行心电图。应更加重视心电图训练,并根据需要全年进行定期训练。这些简单而可预防的错误可以通过人工智能支持的程序更容易地克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
It is Important to be Able to Interpret an ECG Correctly and Quickly: Do We Know How to Perform an ECG?

Background: Electrocardiography (ECG) plays a pivotal role in diagnosing certain cardiac pathologies. Interpreters receive significant training in this area; however, an electrocardiogram must be performed correctly for accurate interpretation. It should also be recorded and interpreted swiftly. The aim of this study was to assess the level of technical knowledge regarding ECG performance among healthcare professionals.

Methods: The study was conducted between June 2023 and September 2023. A total of 243 participants, including nurses, doctors, and medical and nursing faculty students, were enrolled. The participants were asked 16 questions via a Google survey. The participants were statistically compared based on their professions and workplaces.

Results: The relationships between the descriptive characteristics of the participants and electrocardiography knowledge scores were not statistically significant in terms of age, gender, employment status, or duration of employment (p > 0.05). However, medical faculty students had significantly higher ECG knowledge scores compared to nurses (p < 0.01). Among the nurses, those working in surgical units had significantly lower scores than those working in internal medicine and pediatric units (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In this study, 16 questions were used to evaluate ECG acquisition knowledge. The ECG knowledge scores of the participants ranged between 0-14 and the mean score was 6.95 ± 3.13, which is quite low for a simple and applicable test. A simple mistake or delay in performing an electrocardiogram can lead to catastrophic consequences. Although nurses are the primary personnel performing ECG, their technical knowledge in performing the procedure was not as proficient as doctors. Some areas of focus may lead to errors. Although research has consistently focused on interpreting ECG, we still do not know how to perform ECG properly. More emphasis should be placed on ECG training, with the potential for regular training throughout the year as needed. These simple and preventable errors can be more easily overcome with artificial intelligence-supported programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica Sinica welcomes all the papers in the fields related to cardiovascular medicine including basic research, vascular biology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trial, critical care medicine, coronary artery disease, interventional cardiology, arrythmia and electrophysiology, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, valvular and structure cardiac disease, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and so on. We received papers from more than 20 countries and areas of the world. Currently, 40% of the papers were submitted to Acta Cardiologica Sinica from Taiwan, 20% from China, and 20% from the other countries and areas in the world. The acceptance rate for publication was around 50% in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信