急性精神病院入院期间的康复安全:一项基于建构主义的理论研究,以支持风险管理约束背景下以安全为中心的康复护理

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kris Deering, Chris Wagstaff, Richard G. Kyle, Ivor Bermingham, Jo Williams, Chris Pawson
{"title":"急性精神病院入院期间的康复安全:一项基于建构主义的理论研究,以支持风险管理约束背景下以安全为中心的康复护理","authors":"Kris Deering,&nbsp;Chris Wagstaff,&nbsp;Richard G. Kyle,&nbsp;Ivor Bermingham,&nbsp;Jo Williams,&nbsp;Chris Pawson","doi":"10.1111/inm.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recovery during admission to acute mental health hospitals can involve supporting individuals in beginning to work towards a fulfilling life despite experiencing mental distress. This can help reduce risks such as suicide and aggression. However, restrictive risk management practices, such as physical restraint may increase during this period, and the distress caused by these practices can hinder a person's abilities to understand their recovery needs. Little is known about how recovery can occur safely within the context of such risk management restrictions. Therefore, this constructivist grounded theory study explored the perspectives of 15 individuals with hospital admission experiences about how they might begin their recovery journeys amidst these constraints. The study found that people could reconnect with their beliefs about a fulfilling life vicariously through interpersonal relationships. This facilitated a sense-making process allowing individuals to better understand their recovery needs which were otherwise obscured by the complexity and intrusiveness of risk management practices. The theory comprised of four social processes: ‘treating me safely,’ when nurses began to understand those admitted as individuals; ‘outside world inside,’ which involved nurses helping the person to form meaningful connections to their personal world; ‘tangible hopefulness,’ where nurses raised the person's awareness of meaningful successes; and ‘scaffolding recovery,’ which built on the previous three processes, with the nurses helping individuals recognise the potential for working towards a fulfilling life. The study shows how supporting a relational approach to care may lessen people feeling unsafe when admitted to hospital, despite experiencing potentially distressing risk management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety for Recovery During Admission to Acute Mental Health Hospitals: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study to Support Safety-Focused Recovery-Oriented Care in the Context of Risk Management Constraints\",\"authors\":\"Kris Deering,&nbsp;Chris Wagstaff,&nbsp;Richard G. Kyle,&nbsp;Ivor Bermingham,&nbsp;Jo Williams,&nbsp;Chris Pawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recovery during admission to acute mental health hospitals can involve supporting individuals in beginning to work towards a fulfilling life despite experiencing mental distress. This can help reduce risks such as suicide and aggression. However, restrictive risk management practices, such as physical restraint may increase during this period, and the distress caused by these practices can hinder a person's abilities to understand their recovery needs. Little is known about how recovery can occur safely within the context of such risk management restrictions. Therefore, this constructivist grounded theory study explored the perspectives of 15 individuals with hospital admission experiences about how they might begin their recovery journeys amidst these constraints. The study found that people could reconnect with their beliefs about a fulfilling life vicariously through interpersonal relationships. This facilitated a sense-making process allowing individuals to better understand their recovery needs which were otherwise obscured by the complexity and intrusiveness of risk management practices. The theory comprised of four social processes: ‘treating me safely,’ when nurses began to understand those admitted as individuals; ‘outside world inside,’ which involved nurses helping the person to form meaningful connections to their personal world; ‘tangible hopefulness,’ where nurses raised the person's awareness of meaningful successes; and ‘scaffolding recovery,’ which built on the previous three processes, with the nurses helping individuals recognise the potential for working towards a fulfilling life. The study shows how supporting a relational approach to care may lessen people feeling unsafe when admitted to hospital, despite experiencing potentially distressing risk management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70104\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急性精神病院住院期间的康复可以包括支持个人在经历精神痛苦的情况下开始朝着充实的生活努力。这有助于降低自杀和攻击等风险。然而,在此期间,限制性风险管理措施,如身体约束可能会增加,这些措施造成的痛苦可能会阻碍一个人理解他们的康复需求的能力。在这种风险管理限制的情况下,如何才能安全地进行恢复,人们知之甚少。因此,本建构主义扎根理论研究探讨了15个有住院经历的个体的观点,关于他们如何在这些限制中开始他们的康复之旅。研究发现,人们可以通过人际关系间接地重新与他们对充实生活的信念联系起来。这促进了一个有意义的过程,使个人能够更好地了解他们的恢复需求,否则这些需求会被风险管理实践的复杂性和侵入性所掩盖。该理论包括四个社会过程:“安全地对待我”,即护士开始把那些入院的病人当作个体来理解;“外部世界在内部”,这涉及护士帮助患者与他们的个人世界建立有意义的联系;“有形的希望”,即护士提高患者对有意义的成功的意识;“脚手架式康复”是建立在前三个过程的基础上的,护士们帮助人们认识到努力实现充实生活的潜力。该研究表明,尽管经历了潜在的令人痛苦的风险管理实践,但支持关系护理方法可能会减轻人们入院时的不安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety for Recovery During Admission to Acute Mental Health Hospitals: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study to Support Safety-Focused Recovery-Oriented Care in the Context of Risk Management Constraints

Safety for Recovery During Admission to Acute Mental Health Hospitals: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study to Support Safety-Focused Recovery-Oriented Care in the Context of Risk Management Constraints

Recovery during admission to acute mental health hospitals can involve supporting individuals in beginning to work towards a fulfilling life despite experiencing mental distress. This can help reduce risks such as suicide and aggression. However, restrictive risk management practices, such as physical restraint may increase during this period, and the distress caused by these practices can hinder a person's abilities to understand their recovery needs. Little is known about how recovery can occur safely within the context of such risk management restrictions. Therefore, this constructivist grounded theory study explored the perspectives of 15 individuals with hospital admission experiences about how they might begin their recovery journeys amidst these constraints. The study found that people could reconnect with their beliefs about a fulfilling life vicariously through interpersonal relationships. This facilitated a sense-making process allowing individuals to better understand their recovery needs which were otherwise obscured by the complexity and intrusiveness of risk management practices. The theory comprised of four social processes: ‘treating me safely,’ when nurses began to understand those admitted as individuals; ‘outside world inside,’ which involved nurses helping the person to form meaningful connections to their personal world; ‘tangible hopefulness,’ where nurses raised the person's awareness of meaningful successes; and ‘scaffolding recovery,’ which built on the previous three processes, with the nurses helping individuals recognise the potential for working towards a fulfilling life. The study shows how supporting a relational approach to care may lessen people feeling unsafe when admitted to hospital, despite experiencing potentially distressing risk management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信