从道德角度解读生成式人工智能驱动的危机沟通:道德愤怒、真实性和宽恕的作用

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Sungsu Kim, Myoung-Gi Chon
{"title":"从道德角度解读生成式人工智能驱动的危机沟通:道德愤怒、真实性和宽恕的作用","authors":"Sungsu Kim,&nbsp;Myoung-Gi Chon","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to advance crisis communication by incorporating morality in understanding crisis communication and explicating effective strategies for using artificial intelligence (AI) technology (e.g., ChatGPT) in the context of the ‘preventable’ cluster of crisis types. To this end, we conducted an online experiment, adopting a 3 (crisis type) × 2 (crisis response source label) between-subjects design. The results indicate that scansis elicited greater moral outrage than other crisis types and that a crisis response from ChatGPT led to lower authenticity than a crisis response from a PR representative. Indirect effects analyses demonstrated that moral outrage, authenticity and forgiveness mediated the effects of crisis type and message source label on behavioural outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Crisis Communication From a Moral Angle: The Role of Moral Outrage, Authenticity, and Forgiveness\",\"authors\":\"Sungsu Kim,&nbsp;Myoung-Gi Chon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-5973.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aims to advance crisis communication by incorporating morality in understanding crisis communication and explicating effective strategies for using artificial intelligence (AI) technology (e.g., ChatGPT) in the context of the ‘preventable’ cluster of crisis types. To this end, we conducted an online experiment, adopting a 3 (crisis type) × 2 (crisis response source label) between-subjects design. The results indicate that scansis elicited greater moral outrage than other crisis types and that a crisis response from ChatGPT led to lower authenticity than a crisis response from a PR representative. Indirect effects analyses demonstrated that moral outrage, authenticity and forgiveness mediated the effects of crisis type and message source label on behavioural outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过在理解危机沟通中融入道德,并阐明在“可预防”的危机类型集群背景下使用人工智能(AI)技术(例如ChatGPT)的有效策略,从而促进危机沟通。为此,我们进行了在线实验,采用3(危机类型)× 2(危机反应源标签)的被试间设计。结果表明,扫描比其他危机类型引发更大的道德愤怒,ChatGPT的危机反应比公关代表的危机反应导致更低的真实性。间接效应分析表明,道德愤怒、真实性和宽恕介导了危机类型和信息来源标签对行为结果的影响。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Unpacking Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Crisis Communication From a Moral Angle: The Role of Moral Outrage, Authenticity, and Forgiveness

Unpacking Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Crisis Communication From a Moral Angle: The Role of Moral Outrage, Authenticity, and Forgiveness

This study aims to advance crisis communication by incorporating morality in understanding crisis communication and explicating effective strategies for using artificial intelligence (AI) technology (e.g., ChatGPT) in the context of the ‘preventable’ cluster of crisis types. To this end, we conducted an online experiment, adopting a 3 (crisis type) × 2 (crisis response source label) between-subjects design. The results indicate that scansis elicited greater moral outrage than other crisis types and that a crisis response from ChatGPT led to lower authenticity than a crisis response from a PR representative. Indirect effects analyses demonstrated that moral outrage, authenticity and forgiveness mediated the effects of crisis type and message source label on behavioural outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信