新生儿黄疸经皮胆红素测量技术及其与血清胆红素水平一致性的比较分析:一项前瞻性研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Merve Kucukoglu Keser, Evrim Alyamac Dizdar, Esra Beser, Esin Okman, Fatma Nur Sari
{"title":"新生儿黄疸经皮胆红素测量技术及其与血清胆红素水平一致性的比较分析:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Merve Kucukoglu Keser,&nbsp;Evrim Alyamac Dizdar,&nbsp;Esra Beser,&nbsp;Esin Okman,&nbsp;Fatma Nur Sari","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/1688130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> This prospective study aimed to assess the accuracy and agreement of two transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) devices—BiliCare and MBJ20—compared with serum total bilirubin (STB) in neonates with jaundice.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Eighty-eight infants born at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were included. TcB was measured from the auricle using BiliCare and from the sternum using MBJ20, concurrently with STB testing.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The median gestational age was 38 weeks and mean birth weight was 3108 g; 39% were delivered by cesarean section and 49% were male. Mean bilirubin levels were 14.6 mg/dL (MBJ20), 12.9 mg/dL (BiliCare), and 14.4 mg/dL (STB). Both devices showed strong correlation with STB (MBJ20: <i>r</i> = 0.756, BiliCare: <i>r</i> = 0.772; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Mean differences from STB were −0.12 mg/dL for MBJ20 and 1.54 mg/dL for BiliCare. BiliCare showed higher predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.814) than MBJ20 (AUC = 0.751). Optimal TcB cutoff values were 14.2 mg/dL (BiliCare) and 15.6 mg/dL (MBJ20). Regression analysis showed no significant bias for either device. Based on STB measurements, 15% of the infants required phototherapy (PT).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Both devices provide reliable noninvasive screening though BiliCare has a better accuracy in predicting the need for PT.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/1688130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Transcutaneous Bilirubin Measurement Techniques and Their Agreement With Serum Bilirubin Levels in Neonatal Jaundice: A Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Merve Kucukoglu Keser,&nbsp;Evrim Alyamac Dizdar,&nbsp;Esra Beser,&nbsp;Esin Okman,&nbsp;Fatma Nur Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/1688130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Aim:</b> This prospective study aimed to assess the accuracy and agreement of two transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) devices—BiliCare and MBJ20—compared with serum total bilirubin (STB) in neonates with jaundice.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Eighty-eight infants born at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were included. TcB was measured from the auricle using BiliCare and from the sternum using MBJ20, concurrently with STB testing.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> The median gestational age was 38 weeks and mean birth weight was 3108 g; 39% were delivered by cesarean section and 49% were male. Mean bilirubin levels were 14.6 mg/dL (MBJ20), 12.9 mg/dL (BiliCare), and 14.4 mg/dL (STB). Both devices showed strong correlation with STB (MBJ20: <i>r</i> = 0.756, BiliCare: <i>r</i> = 0.772; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Mean differences from STB were −0.12 mg/dL for MBJ20 and 1.54 mg/dL for BiliCare. BiliCare showed higher predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.814) than MBJ20 (AUC = 0.751). Optimal TcB cutoff values were 14.2 mg/dL (BiliCare) and 15.6 mg/dL (MBJ20). Regression analysis showed no significant bias for either device. Based on STB measurements, 15% of the infants required phototherapy (PT).</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Both devices provide reliable noninvasive screening though BiliCare has a better accuracy in predicting the need for PT.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/1688130\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/1688130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/1688130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本前瞻性研究旨在评估两种经皮胆红素(TcB)装置——bilicare和mbj20与黄疸新生儿血清总胆红素(STB)的准确性和一致性。方法:纳入88例≥34孕周出生的婴儿。使用BiliCare从耳廓测量TcB,使用MBJ20从胸骨测量TcB,同时进行STB测试。结果:中位胎龄38周,平均出生体重3108 g;39%为剖宫产,49%为男性。平均胆红素水平分别为14.6 mg/dL (MBJ20)、12.9 mg/dL (BiliCare)和14.4 mg/dL (STB)。两种设备与STB均有较强的相关性(MBJ20: r = 0.756, BiliCare: r = 0.772;p & lt;0.001)。MBJ20与STB的平均差异为- 0.12 mg/dL, BiliCare的平均差异为1.54 mg/dL。BiliCare的预测准确率(AUC = 0.814)高于MBJ20 (AUC = 0.751)。最佳TcB临界值分别为14.2 mg/dL (BiliCare)和15.6 mg/dL (MBJ20)。回归分析显示两种设备均无显著偏倚。根据STB测量,15%的婴儿需要光疗(PT)。结论:两种设备均提供可靠的无创筛查,但BiliCare在预测PT需求方面具有更好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Analysis of Transcutaneous Bilirubin Measurement Techniques and Their Agreement With Serum Bilirubin Levels in Neonatal Jaundice: A Prospective Study

Comparative Analysis of Transcutaneous Bilirubin Measurement Techniques and Their Agreement With Serum Bilirubin Levels in Neonatal Jaundice: A Prospective Study

Aim: This prospective study aimed to assess the accuracy and agreement of two transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) devices—BiliCare and MBJ20—compared with serum total bilirubin (STB) in neonates with jaundice.

Methods: Eighty-eight infants born at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were included. TcB was measured from the auricle using BiliCare and from the sternum using MBJ20, concurrently with STB testing.

Results: The median gestational age was 38 weeks and mean birth weight was 3108 g; 39% were delivered by cesarean section and 49% were male. Mean bilirubin levels were 14.6 mg/dL (MBJ20), 12.9 mg/dL (BiliCare), and 14.4 mg/dL (STB). Both devices showed strong correlation with STB (MBJ20: r = 0.756, BiliCare: r = 0.772; p < 0.001). Mean differences from STB were −0.12 mg/dL for MBJ20 and 1.54 mg/dL for BiliCare. BiliCare showed higher predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.814) than MBJ20 (AUC = 0.751). Optimal TcB cutoff values were 14.2 mg/dL (BiliCare) and 15.6 mg/dL (MBJ20). Regression analysis showed no significant bias for either device. Based on STB measurements, 15% of the infants required phototherapy (PT).

Conclusion: Both devices provide reliable noninvasive screening though BiliCare has a better accuracy in predicting the need for PT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信