美国的荒地城市接口代码:国际代码委员会和加利福尼亚州代码的比较

IF 2.4 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marcelo M. Hirschler
{"title":"美国的荒地城市接口代码:国际代码委员会和加利福尼亚州代码的比较","authors":"Marcelo M. Hirschler","doi":"10.1002/fam.3255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Two organizations in the United States have developed codes to protect against the hazards associated with wildfires: the International Code Council (ICC; a private not-for-profit organization) and the state of California. Both codes contain strict requirements that, when put into effect, do significantly improve fire safety. The ICC code (IWUIC) has been adopted (either as issued or with amendments) by several states in the USA while the California code (CA Chapter 7A) applies only in that state. There are many similarities between both sets of codes but there are also some clear differences. The most important difference is that CA Chapter 7A allows wood that has not been treated with fire retardants (untreated wood) to be used on decks and walls, while the IWUIC requires the use of materials with improved fire performance for those applications. On the other hand, there are also requirements in CA Chapter 7A that are more conducive to fire safety than the equivalent ones in the IWUIC. One example is the fact that CA Chapter 7A does not permit the use of coated wood materials, in view of the act that all wildland applications involve exterior use and that coatings on wood materials have been shown to be susceptible to suffer fire performance degradation when exposed to weather; IWUIC is silent on that issue, meaning that the use of coated wood materials is not prohibited. The two codes (in the USA only) will be compared and contrasted in this work with respect to delivering improved fire safety.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"49 5","pages":"824-834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wildland Urban Interface Codes in the USA: Comparison Between the Codes From the International Code Council and the State of California\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo M. Hirschler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fam.3255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Two organizations in the United States have developed codes to protect against the hazards associated with wildfires: the International Code Council (ICC; a private not-for-profit organization) and the state of California. Both codes contain strict requirements that, when put into effect, do significantly improve fire safety. The ICC code (IWUIC) has been adopted (either as issued or with amendments) by several states in the USA while the California code (CA Chapter 7A) applies only in that state. There are many similarities between both sets of codes but there are also some clear differences. The most important difference is that CA Chapter 7A allows wood that has not been treated with fire retardants (untreated wood) to be used on decks and walls, while the IWUIC requires the use of materials with improved fire performance for those applications. On the other hand, there are also requirements in CA Chapter 7A that are more conducive to fire safety than the equivalent ones in the IWUIC. One example is the fact that CA Chapter 7A does not permit the use of coated wood materials, in view of the act that all wildland applications involve exterior use and that coatings on wood materials have been shown to be susceptible to suffer fire performance degradation when exposed to weather; IWUIC is silent on that issue, meaning that the use of coated wood materials is not prohibited. The two codes (in the USA only) will be compared and contrasted in this work with respect to delivering improved fire safety.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"824-834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire and Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国有两个组织制定了防止与野火有关的危害的守则:国际守则理事会;一个私人非营利组织)和加利福尼亚州。这两个守则都有严格的规定,一旦实施,就会大大改善消防安全。国际商会法典(IWUIC)已被美国几个州采用(无论是发布还是修订),而加州法典(CA第7A章)仅适用于该州。两套代码之间有许多相似之处,但也有一些明显的差异。最重要的区别是CA第7A章允许未经阻燃剂处理的木材(未经处理的木材)用于甲板和墙壁,而IWUIC要求使用具有改进防火性能的材料用于这些应用。另一方面,CA Chapter 7A中的要求也比IWUIC中的同等要求更有利于消防安全。一个例子是CA第7A章不允许使用涂层木材材料,因为所有的荒地应用都涉及外部使用,并且木材材料上的涂层在暴露于天气时容易遭受防火性能下降;IWUIC在这个问题上保持沉默,这意味着不禁止使用涂层木质材料。这两个规范(仅在美国)将在提供改进的消防安全方面进行比较和对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wildland Urban Interface Codes in the USA: Comparison Between the Codes From the International Code Council and the State of California

Two organizations in the United States have developed codes to protect against the hazards associated with wildfires: the International Code Council (ICC; a private not-for-profit organization) and the state of California. Both codes contain strict requirements that, when put into effect, do significantly improve fire safety. The ICC code (IWUIC) has been adopted (either as issued or with amendments) by several states in the USA while the California code (CA Chapter 7A) applies only in that state. There are many similarities between both sets of codes but there are also some clear differences. The most important difference is that CA Chapter 7A allows wood that has not been treated with fire retardants (untreated wood) to be used on decks and walls, while the IWUIC requires the use of materials with improved fire performance for those applications. On the other hand, there are also requirements in CA Chapter 7A that are more conducive to fire safety than the equivalent ones in the IWUIC. One example is the fact that CA Chapter 7A does not permit the use of coated wood materials, in view of the act that all wildland applications involve exterior use and that coatings on wood materials have been shown to be susceptible to suffer fire performance degradation when exposed to weather; IWUIC is silent on that issue, meaning that the use of coated wood materials is not prohibited. The two codes (in the USA only) will be compared and contrasted in this work with respect to delivering improved fire safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire and Materials
Fire and Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals. Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信