揭示碳中和之路:制度创新、知识与技术创新、话语权与问责制的作用

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Xiongfeng Pan;Li Jiang
{"title":"揭示碳中和之路:制度创新、知识与技术创新、话语权与问责制的作用","authors":"Xiongfeng Pan;Li Jiang","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3587499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grounded in organizational change theory, stakeholder theory, and innovation systems theory, this study explores how institutional innovation shapes carbon efficiency across 96 countries and regions. Drawing on insights from prior literature, we develop a conceptual framework that considers institutional innovation’s potential direct effect on carbon efficiency, its indirect influence through knowledge and technology innovation (including creation, impact, and diffusion), and the moderating role of voice and accountability. Using panel data analysis, our empirical findings confirm that institutional innovation significantly improves carbon efficiency, both directly and via the mediating pathway of knowledge and technology innovation. The positive moderating effect of voice and accountability is especially evident in developing countries and autocratic regimes. Our study extends existing research by providing robust empirical evidence on the multiple channels through which institutional innovation affects environmental outcomes, and by emphasizing how governance contexts condition these effects. Policy implications suggest that differentiated institutional reforms, promoting democratic participation and technology diffusion in developing nations, enhancing governance frameworks in developed economies, and introducing targeted adjustments in autocratic systems, are essential for accelerating carbon neutrality and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"3166-3181"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the Path to Carbon Neutrality: The Role of Institutional Innovation, Knowledge & Technology Innovation, and Voice & Accountability\",\"authors\":\"Xiongfeng Pan;Li Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2025.3587499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grounded in organizational change theory, stakeholder theory, and innovation systems theory, this study explores how institutional innovation shapes carbon efficiency across 96 countries and regions. Drawing on insights from prior literature, we develop a conceptual framework that considers institutional innovation’s potential direct effect on carbon efficiency, its indirect influence through knowledge and technology innovation (including creation, impact, and diffusion), and the moderating role of voice and accountability. Using panel data analysis, our empirical findings confirm that institutional innovation significantly improves carbon efficiency, both directly and via the mediating pathway of knowledge and technology innovation. The positive moderating effect of voice and accountability is especially evident in developing countries and autocratic regimes. Our study extends existing research by providing robust empirical evidence on the multiple channels through which institutional innovation affects environmental outcomes, and by emphasizing how governance contexts condition these effects. Policy implications suggest that differentiated institutional reforms, promoting democratic participation and technology diffusion in developing nations, enhancing governance frameworks in developed economies, and introducing targeted adjustments in autocratic systems, are essential for accelerating carbon neutrality and sustainable development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"3166-3181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11075527/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11075527/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以组织变革理论、利益相关者理论和创新系统理论为基础,探讨了制度创新如何影响96个国家和地区的碳效率。借鉴以往文献的见解,我们开发了一个概念框架,考虑制度创新对碳效率的潜在直接影响,通过知识和技术创新(包括创造、影响和扩散)产生的间接影响,以及声音和问责制的调节作用。通过面板数据分析,我们的实证结果证实了制度创新显著提高了碳效率,并通过知识创新和技术创新的中介途径直接提高了碳效率。话语权和问责制的积极调节作用在发展中国家和专制政权中尤为明显。我们的研究扩展了现有的研究,提供了关于制度创新影响环境结果的多种渠道的强有力的经验证据,并强调了治理背景如何制约这些影响。政策影响表明,差异化的制度改革、促进发展中国家的民主参与和技术扩散、加强发达经济体的治理框架以及在专制制度中引入有针对性的调整,对于加速碳中和和可持续发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling the Path to Carbon Neutrality: The Role of Institutional Innovation, Knowledge & Technology Innovation, and Voice & Accountability
Grounded in organizational change theory, stakeholder theory, and innovation systems theory, this study explores how institutional innovation shapes carbon efficiency across 96 countries and regions. Drawing on insights from prior literature, we develop a conceptual framework that considers institutional innovation’s potential direct effect on carbon efficiency, its indirect influence through knowledge and technology innovation (including creation, impact, and diffusion), and the moderating role of voice and accountability. Using panel data analysis, our empirical findings confirm that institutional innovation significantly improves carbon efficiency, both directly and via the mediating pathway of knowledge and technology innovation. The positive moderating effect of voice and accountability is especially evident in developing countries and autocratic regimes. Our study extends existing research by providing robust empirical evidence on the multiple channels through which institutional innovation affects environmental outcomes, and by emphasizing how governance contexts condition these effects. Policy implications suggest that differentiated institutional reforms, promoting democratic participation and technology diffusion in developing nations, enhancing governance frameworks in developed economies, and introducing targeted adjustments in autocratic systems, are essential for accelerating carbon neutrality and sustainable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信