Yue Yang , Lu Liu , Hui-Hui Wang , Yan Lu , Jiang-Ping Li , Ping Liu , Zi-Cheng Hu , Xiao Yang
{"title":"基于基本临床和实验室参数的疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变早期诊断方法的发展和评估","authors":"Yue Yang , Lu Liu , Hui-Hui Wang , Yan Lu , Jiang-Ping Li , Ping Liu , Zi-Cheng Hu , Xiao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study is to construct a predictive model for the onset of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The clinical and laboratory data of 783 patients with DPN were retrospectively analyzed to form the modeling group. A Douleur Neuropathique 4 score of ≥4 was used to identify neuropathic pain (NP), and such patients were categorized into the PDPN group. Potential predictive variables were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression was subsequently used to construct a predictive model for PDPN. The discriminatory power and calibration of the model were assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration plots. For validation, the model was tested on an independent group of 350 patients with DPN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final modeling and validation groups comprised of 359 and 162 patients with PDPN, respectively. The inclusion of five clinical variables resulted in an optimal predictive model: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.173, P < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) (OR = 1.813, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.081, P = 0.002), disease duration (OR = 1.066, P < 0.001), and 24-hour urine microalbumin (UMA) (OR = 1.003, P < 0.001). The areas under the ROC curve for the modeling and validation groups were 0.812 and 0.850, respectively. The calibration plot demonstrated a close fit between the calibration curve and the ideal curve, with Hosmer–Lemeshow P values of 0.4153 for the modeling group and 0.8413 for the validation group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings indicate that our nomogram can effectively predict the occurrence of PDPN in patients with DPN, thereby assisting clinicians in identifying patients at risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 112847"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and assessment of an early diagnostic approach for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy using basic clinical and laboratory parameters\",\"authors\":\"Yue Yang , Lu Liu , Hui-Hui Wang , Yan Lu , Jiang-Ping Li , Ping Liu , Zi-Cheng Hu , Xiao Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study is to construct a predictive model for the onset of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The clinical and laboratory data of 783 patients with DPN were retrospectively analyzed to form the modeling group. A Douleur Neuropathique 4 score of ≥4 was used to identify neuropathic pain (NP), and such patients were categorized into the PDPN group. Potential predictive variables were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression was subsequently used to construct a predictive model for PDPN. The discriminatory power and calibration of the model were assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration plots. For validation, the model was tested on an independent group of 350 patients with DPN.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final modeling and validation groups comprised of 359 and 162 patients with PDPN, respectively. The inclusion of five clinical variables resulted in an optimal predictive model: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.173, P < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) (OR = 1.813, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.081, P = 0.002), disease duration (OR = 1.066, P < 0.001), and 24-hour urine microalbumin (UMA) (OR = 1.003, P < 0.001). The areas under the ROC curve for the modeling and validation groups were 0.812 and 0.850, respectively. The calibration plot demonstrated a close fit between the calibration curve and the ideal curve, with Hosmer–Lemeshow P values of 0.4153 for the modeling group and 0.8413 for the validation group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings indicate that our nomogram can effectively predict the occurrence of PDPN in patients with DPN, thereby assisting clinicians in identifying patients at risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的建立糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)患者疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)发病的预测模型。方法回顾性分析783例DPN患者的临床和实验室资料,形成模型组。采用Douleur neuropathque 4评分≥4分来判断神经性疼痛(NP),并将此类患者分为PDPN组。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归筛选潜在的预测变量。随后采用Logistic回归构建PDPN的预测模型。采用接收算子特征(ROC)曲线分析和校正图评估模型的判别能力和校正能力。为了验证,该模型在350名DPN患者的独立组中进行了测试。结果最终建模组359例,验证组162例。纳入5个临床变量得出最佳预测模型:血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)(优势比[OR] = 1.173, P <;0.001),甘油三酯(TG) (OR = 1.813, P <;0.001)、体重指数(BMI) (OR = 1.081, P = 0.002)、病程(OR = 1.066, P <;0.001), 24小时尿微量白蛋白(UMA) (OR = 1.003, P <;0.001)。建模组和验证组的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.812和0.850。校正图显示校正曲线与理想曲线的拟合非常接近,建模组的Hosmer-Lemeshow P值为0.4153,验证组的P值为0.8413。结论本研究的nomogram PDPN可以有效预测DPN患者PDPN的发生,从而帮助临床医生识别高危患者。
Development and assessment of an early diagnostic approach for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy using basic clinical and laboratory parameters
Objective
The objective of this study is to construct a predictive model for the onset of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
Methods
The clinical and laboratory data of 783 patients with DPN were retrospectively analyzed to form the modeling group. A Douleur Neuropathique 4 score of ≥4 was used to identify neuropathic pain (NP), and such patients were categorized into the PDPN group. Potential predictive variables were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression was subsequently used to construct a predictive model for PDPN. The discriminatory power and calibration of the model were assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration plots. For validation, the model was tested on an independent group of 350 patients with DPN.
Results
The final modeling and validation groups comprised of 359 and 162 patients with PDPN, respectively. The inclusion of five clinical variables resulted in an optimal predictive model: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.173, P < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) (OR = 1.813, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.081, P = 0.002), disease duration (OR = 1.066, P < 0.001), and 24-hour urine microalbumin (UMA) (OR = 1.003, P < 0.001). The areas under the ROC curve for the modeling and validation groups were 0.812 and 0.850, respectively. The calibration plot demonstrated a close fit between the calibration curve and the ideal curve, with Hosmer–Lemeshow P values of 0.4153 for the modeling group and 0.8413 for the validation group.
Conclusion
These findings indicate that our nomogram can effectively predict the occurrence of PDPN in patients with DPN, thereby assisting clinicians in identifying patients at risk.