Nicholas M. Andronicos , Malcolm R. Knox , Jody McNally , Peter W. Hunt
{"title":"寄主抵抗状况与接种巴氏疫苗控制绵羊混合寄生虫田间攻毒的直接比较","authors":"Nicholas M. Andronicos , Malcolm R. Knox , Jody McNally , Peter W. Hunt","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrated parasite management strategies including paddock rotations, pasture management, vaccination and parasite resistance genetics, may be used to control sheep parasitism whilst minimising anthelmintic treatment. However, the efficacy of host parasite resistance traits and/or vaccination to reduce reliance on anthelmintics to control haemonchosis from a mixed parasite field trial remains unknown. Animals from three flocks with different genetic backgrounds received a standard Barbervax vaccination schedule (5 vaccinations) and were grazed as a single mob, ensuring each cohort received the same parasite exposure during the field trial. Lambs received rescue treatments if their haemoglobin concentration was less than 85 g/dL and/or had worm egg count above 15,000 eggs/g. After three vaccinations, lambs from all lines produced significant H-gal-GP antibody titres which, for parasite-susceptible and parasite-unselected lines provided protection against haemonchosis (reduced anaemia and low <em>Haemonchus contortus</em> egg counts) compared to unvaccinated lambs. Barbervax also reduced the need to rescue treat lambs in the parasite-unselected and parasite-susceptible flocks by 73 % and 93 %, respectively, compared to unvaccinated lambs from the same lines. After three Barbervax vaccinations lambs from a parasite-unselected flock were protected from haemonchosis but not from scouring caused by <em>Trichostrongylus spp.</em>, whereas parasite-resistant line lambs were protected from haemonchosis and scouring, did not require rescue drenching and did not substantially benefit from Barbervax vaccination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"339 ","pages":"Article 110552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct comparison of host resistance status and Barbervax vaccination to control parasitism in sheep subjected to a mixed parasite field challenge\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas M. Andronicos , Malcolm R. Knox , Jody McNally , Peter W. Hunt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integrated parasite management strategies including paddock rotations, pasture management, vaccination and parasite resistance genetics, may be used to control sheep parasitism whilst minimising anthelmintic treatment. However, the efficacy of host parasite resistance traits and/or vaccination to reduce reliance on anthelmintics to control haemonchosis from a mixed parasite field trial remains unknown. Animals from three flocks with different genetic backgrounds received a standard Barbervax vaccination schedule (5 vaccinations) and were grazed as a single mob, ensuring each cohort received the same parasite exposure during the field trial. Lambs received rescue treatments if their haemoglobin concentration was less than 85 g/dL and/or had worm egg count above 15,000 eggs/g. After three vaccinations, lambs from all lines produced significant H-gal-GP antibody titres which, for parasite-susceptible and parasite-unselected lines provided protection against haemonchosis (reduced anaemia and low <em>Haemonchus contortus</em> egg counts) compared to unvaccinated lambs. Barbervax also reduced the need to rescue treat lambs in the parasite-unselected and parasite-susceptible flocks by 73 % and 93 %, respectively, compared to unvaccinated lambs from the same lines. After three Barbervax vaccinations lambs from a parasite-unselected flock were protected from haemonchosis but not from scouring caused by <em>Trichostrongylus spp.</em>, whereas parasite-resistant line lambs were protected from haemonchosis and scouring, did not require rescue drenching and did not substantially benefit from Barbervax vaccination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"volume\":\"339 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725001633\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725001633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct comparison of host resistance status and Barbervax vaccination to control parasitism in sheep subjected to a mixed parasite field challenge
Integrated parasite management strategies including paddock rotations, pasture management, vaccination and parasite resistance genetics, may be used to control sheep parasitism whilst minimising anthelmintic treatment. However, the efficacy of host parasite resistance traits and/or vaccination to reduce reliance on anthelmintics to control haemonchosis from a mixed parasite field trial remains unknown. Animals from three flocks with different genetic backgrounds received a standard Barbervax vaccination schedule (5 vaccinations) and were grazed as a single mob, ensuring each cohort received the same parasite exposure during the field trial. Lambs received rescue treatments if their haemoglobin concentration was less than 85 g/dL and/or had worm egg count above 15,000 eggs/g. After three vaccinations, lambs from all lines produced significant H-gal-GP antibody titres which, for parasite-susceptible and parasite-unselected lines provided protection against haemonchosis (reduced anaemia and low Haemonchus contortus egg counts) compared to unvaccinated lambs. Barbervax also reduced the need to rescue treat lambs in the parasite-unselected and parasite-susceptible flocks by 73 % and 93 %, respectively, compared to unvaccinated lambs from the same lines. After three Barbervax vaccinations lambs from a parasite-unselected flock were protected from haemonchosis but not from scouring caused by Trichostrongylus spp., whereas parasite-resistant line lambs were protected from haemonchosis and scouring, did not require rescue drenching and did not substantially benefit from Barbervax vaccination.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.