对披露和寻求心理健康问题帮助的决策辅助工具的范围审查

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kassandra Hon , Mark Boyes , Penelope Hasking , Katrina Hon , Stephen P. Lewis
{"title":"对披露和寻求心理健康问题帮助的决策辅助工具的范围审查","authors":"Kassandra Hon ,&nbsp;Mark Boyes ,&nbsp;Penelope Hasking ,&nbsp;Katrina Hon ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, there is a large discrepancy between the prevalence of mental health concerns and the proportion of people who disclose or seek help for their mental health. As such, decision-aid tools have recently emerged in the mental health context to facilitate the disclosure and help-seeking process. Given recent developments in this field, a synthesis of the literature is needed to consolidate existing decision-aid tools and assess their effectiveness, particularly in facilitating the disclosure or help-seeking process. This scoping review aimed to capture and synthesise the growing literature on decision-aid tools designed to support people in the decision to disclose or seek help for their mental health concerns. The review considered empirical studies, including theses and dissertations that matched the following criteria: 1) focused on populations with a mental health concern, 2) reported the development and/or evaluation of a decision-aid tool, and 3) assessed a tool specifically designed to facilitate the disclosure or help-seeking process, or reported on at least one disclosure or help-seeking related outcome. The review was guided by Arksey and O’Malley's framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines for scoping reviews. The findings of the review indicate that decision-aid tools can support various cognitive-emotional processes relevant to decision-making. There was also evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of decision-aid tools in increasing the rates of disclosure and help-seeking behaviours for mental health concerns. Overall, decision-aid tools appear to be a promising approach to enhance the effectiveness of disclosure and help-seeking decisions in the mental health context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102628"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of decision-aid tools for disclosure and help-seeking of mental health concerns\",\"authors\":\"Kassandra Hon ,&nbsp;Mark Boyes ,&nbsp;Penelope Hasking ,&nbsp;Katrina Hon ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Globally, there is a large discrepancy between the prevalence of mental health concerns and the proportion of people who disclose or seek help for their mental health. As such, decision-aid tools have recently emerged in the mental health context to facilitate the disclosure and help-seeking process. Given recent developments in this field, a synthesis of the literature is needed to consolidate existing decision-aid tools and assess their effectiveness, particularly in facilitating the disclosure or help-seeking process. This scoping review aimed to capture and synthesise the growing literature on decision-aid tools designed to support people in the decision to disclose or seek help for their mental health concerns. The review considered empirical studies, including theses and dissertations that matched the following criteria: 1) focused on populations with a mental health concern, 2) reported the development and/or evaluation of a decision-aid tool, and 3) assessed a tool specifically designed to facilitate the disclosure or help-seeking process, or reported on at least one disclosure or help-seeking related outcome. The review was guided by Arksey and O’Malley's framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines for scoping reviews. The findings of the review indicate that decision-aid tools can support various cognitive-emotional processes relevant to decision-making. There was also evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of decision-aid tools in increasing the rates of disclosure and help-seeking behaviours for mental health concerns. Overall, decision-aid tools appear to be a promising approach to enhance the effectiveness of disclosure and help-seeking decisions in the mental health context.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000959\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,心理健康问题的普遍程度与披露或寻求心理健康帮助的人的比例之间存在很大差异。因此,最近在精神卫生方面出现了决策援助工具,以促进披露和寻求帮助的过程。鉴于这一领域的最新发展,需要综合文献,以巩固现有的辅助决策工具并评估其有效性,特别是在促进披露或寻求帮助过程方面。这项范围审查的目的是收集和综合越来越多的关于决策辅助工具的文献,这些工具旨在支持人们决定披露或寻求心理健康问题的帮助。本综述考虑了实证研究,包括符合以下标准的论文:1)关注有心理健康问题的人群,2)报告了决策辅助工具的开发和/或评估,以及3)评估了专门设计用于促进披露或寻求帮助过程的工具,或报告了至少一个披露或寻求帮助相关的结果。这次审查以Arksey和O 'Malley的框架和乔安娜布里格斯研究所的审查范围指南为指导。研究结果表明,决策辅助工具可以支持与决策相关的各种认知-情绪过程。也有证据表明,决策援助工具在提高心理健康问题的披露率和寻求帮助行为方面是有效的。总体而言,决策援助工具似乎是一种有希望的方法,以提高在精神卫生背景下披露和寻求帮助的决定的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of decision-aid tools for disclosure and help-seeking of mental health concerns
Globally, there is a large discrepancy between the prevalence of mental health concerns and the proportion of people who disclose or seek help for their mental health. As such, decision-aid tools have recently emerged in the mental health context to facilitate the disclosure and help-seeking process. Given recent developments in this field, a synthesis of the literature is needed to consolidate existing decision-aid tools and assess their effectiveness, particularly in facilitating the disclosure or help-seeking process. This scoping review aimed to capture and synthesise the growing literature on decision-aid tools designed to support people in the decision to disclose or seek help for their mental health concerns. The review considered empirical studies, including theses and dissertations that matched the following criteria: 1) focused on populations with a mental health concern, 2) reported the development and/or evaluation of a decision-aid tool, and 3) assessed a tool specifically designed to facilitate the disclosure or help-seeking process, or reported on at least one disclosure or help-seeking related outcome. The review was guided by Arksey and O’Malley's framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines for scoping reviews. The findings of the review indicate that decision-aid tools can support various cognitive-emotional processes relevant to decision-making. There was also evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of decision-aid tools in increasing the rates of disclosure and help-seeking behaviours for mental health concerns. Overall, decision-aid tools appear to be a promising approach to enhance the effectiveness of disclosure and help-seeking decisions in the mental health context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信