推进循环直接单剪试验技术的发展:历史、现状、挑战和未来趋势

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xin Kang , Zi-Rui Ma , Louis Ge
{"title":"推进循环直接单剪试验技术的发展:历史、现状、挑战和未来趋势","authors":"Xin Kang ,&nbsp;Zi-Rui Ma ,&nbsp;Louis Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 109705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the state of the art of cyclic direct simple shear Testing: Histories, current status, challenges and future trends\",\"authors\":\"Xin Kang ,&nbsp;Zi-Rui Ma ,&nbsp;Louis Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环直接单剪(CDSS)试验旨在模拟地震荷载作用下的原位应力-应变行为,已成为评估液化潜力和土壤本构特性的广泛工具。近年来,它在本构建模、非饱和土力学和剪切波速测量等方面的应用越来越广泛。然而,CDSS设备存在固有的局限性,包括垂直边界上缺乏互补剪应力,压板边缘的应力和应变集中,应力分量测量不完整,土壤性质评估可能不准确,以及莫尔圈构建所需的假设。这些限制常常被实践者所忽视,可能导致不可靠的结果。本文全面回顾了CDSS测试的历史、发展、应用,并批判性地指出了CDSS测试的局限性。我们研究了围绕其使用的持续争议,讨论了未来的趋势,并强调了适当的工程应用以及理论和实验的缺点。本文旨在加深对CDSS检测的了解,并促进对检测结果的更明智的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing the state of the art of cyclic direct simple shear Testing: Histories, current status, challenges and future trends
The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信