{"title":"推进循环直接单剪试验技术的发展:历史、现状、挑战和未来趋势","authors":"Xin Kang , Zi-Rui Ma , Louis Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 109705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the state of the art of cyclic direct simple shear Testing: Histories, current status, challenges and future trends\",\"authors\":\"Xin Kang , Zi-Rui Ma , Louis Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109705\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004981\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125004981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing the state of the art of cyclic direct simple shear Testing: Histories, current status, challenges and future trends
The Cyclic Direct Simple Shear (CDSS) test, designed to simulate in-situ stress-strain behaviors during seismic loading, has become a widely used tool for assessing liquefaction potential and soil constitutive properties. Recent advancements have broadened its applications in constitutive modeling, unsaturated soil mechanics, and shear wave velocity measurement. However, the CDSS apparatus suffers from inherent limitations, including the absence of complementary shear stresses on vertical boundaries, stress and strain concentrations at platen edges, incomplete stress component measurement, potential for inaccurate soil property assessment, and assumptions required for Mohr’ circle construction. These limitations, often overlooked by practitioners, can lead to unreliable results. This paper comprehensively reviews the histories, development, applications, and, critically, the limitations of CDSS testing. We examine the ongoing controversies surrounding its use, discuss future trends, and highlight both the appropriate engineering applications and the theoretical and experimental drawbacks. This review aims to provide a deeper understanding of CDSS testing and promote more informed interpretation of test results.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering.
Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.