灌溉甜菜水分利用和水分利用效率对不同耕作方式的响应

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
J.D. Jabro , W.B. Stevens , W.M. Iversen , U.M. Sainju , B.L. Allen , S.R. Dangi , C. Chen
{"title":"灌溉甜菜水分利用和水分利用效率对不同耕作方式的响应","authors":"J.D. Jabro ,&nbsp;W.B. Stevens ,&nbsp;W.M. Iversen ,&nbsp;U.M. Sainju ,&nbsp;B.L. Allen ,&nbsp;S.R. Dangi ,&nbsp;C. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is limited literature and information on effects of various tillage practices on crop water use (WU) and water use efficiency (WUE) for irrigated sugarbeet (<em>Beta vulgaris</em> L.) production. A field study was conducted to assess the effect of conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT) and strip tillage (ST) practices on WU and WUE of sugarbeet in a clay loam soil under over-head sprinkler irrigation in the northern Great Plains region (NGP) of the United States. Tillage treatments were replicated five times in a randomized block design. Seasonal WU for sugarbeet root yield was calculated based on the soil water balance equation for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons under CT, NT and ST practices. Crop WUE for root yield or sucrose yield under each tillage system and year were estimated by dividing root yield and sucrose yield by the amount of water used by the crop through the process of evapotranspiration (ET). No significant differences due to tillage treatment were found for WU, sugarbeet root yield, sucrose yield, and WUE for root yield, and WUE for sucrose yield in 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons. On average, total amounts of water required to produce one Megagram (Mg) of sugarbeet root were 60.6 m<sup>3</sup> for CT, 65.7 m<sup>3</sup> for NT and 61.3 m<sup>3</sup> for ST. The amount of water used to produce a given quantity of roots under NT was slightly greater than both CT and ST. Maximizing crop WUE is possible with innovative, and smart technologies along with appropriate land and irrigation management practices. While NT and ST offer economic and environmental advantages over CT for agricultural production, more studies are needed under various soils, environments, and farming practices prior to making any recommendation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 106776"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irrigated sugarbeet water use and water use efficiency responses to various tillage practices\",\"authors\":\"J.D. Jabro ,&nbsp;W.B. Stevens ,&nbsp;W.M. Iversen ,&nbsp;U.M. Sainju ,&nbsp;B.L. Allen ,&nbsp;S.R. Dangi ,&nbsp;C. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There is limited literature and information on effects of various tillage practices on crop water use (WU) and water use efficiency (WUE) for irrigated sugarbeet (<em>Beta vulgaris</em> L.) production. A field study was conducted to assess the effect of conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT) and strip tillage (ST) practices on WU and WUE of sugarbeet in a clay loam soil under over-head sprinkler irrigation in the northern Great Plains region (NGP) of the United States. Tillage treatments were replicated five times in a randomized block design. Seasonal WU for sugarbeet root yield was calculated based on the soil water balance equation for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons under CT, NT and ST practices. Crop WUE for root yield or sucrose yield under each tillage system and year were estimated by dividing root yield and sucrose yield by the amount of water used by the crop through the process of evapotranspiration (ET). No significant differences due to tillage treatment were found for WU, sugarbeet root yield, sucrose yield, and WUE for root yield, and WUE for sucrose yield in 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons. On average, total amounts of water required to produce one Megagram (Mg) of sugarbeet root were 60.6 m<sup>3</sup> for CT, 65.7 m<sup>3</sup> for NT and 61.3 m<sup>3</sup> for ST. The amount of water used to produce a given quantity of roots under NT was slightly greater than both CT and ST. Maximizing crop WUE is possible with innovative, and smart technologies along with appropriate land and irrigation management practices. While NT and ST offer economic and environmental advantages over CT for agricultural production, more studies are needed under various soils, environments, and farming practices prior to making any recommendation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725003307\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725003307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于不同耕作方式对灌溉甜菜作物水分利用和水分利用效率的影响,文献资料有限。在美国北部大平原地区(NGP)进行了常规耕作(CT)、免耕作(NT)和条带耕作(ST)对土壤土壤水分利用率和水分利用效率的影响。在随机区组设计中重复5次耕作处理。基于土壤水分平衡方程,计算了2018、2019和2020三个生长季节在CT、NT和ST下甜菜根产量的季节WU。用根系产量和蔗糖产量除以作物通过蒸散发(ET)过程耗水量,估算出各耕作制度和年份下作物根系产量或蔗糖产量的水分利用效率。在2018年、2019年和2020年三个生长季,不同耕作方式对WU、甜菜根产量、蔗糖产量以及根产量的水分利用效率和蔗糖产量的水分利用效率无显著差异。平均而言,生产1毫克甜菜根所需的总水量为:连续栽培60.6 m3,新栽培65.7 m3,圣栽培61.3 m3。在连续栽培下,生产一定数量甜菜根所需的水量略大于连续栽培和圣栽培。通过创新、智能技术以及适当的土地和灌溉管理实践,可以实现作物水分利用效率的最大化。虽然NT和ST在农业生产方面比CT具有经济和环境优势,但在提出任何建议之前,需要在各种土壤、环境和耕作方式下进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Irrigated sugarbeet water use and water use efficiency responses to various tillage practices
There is limited literature and information on effects of various tillage practices on crop water use (WU) and water use efficiency (WUE) for irrigated sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) production. A field study was conducted to assess the effect of conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT) and strip tillage (ST) practices on WU and WUE of sugarbeet in a clay loam soil under over-head sprinkler irrigation in the northern Great Plains region (NGP) of the United States. Tillage treatments were replicated five times in a randomized block design. Seasonal WU for sugarbeet root yield was calculated based on the soil water balance equation for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons under CT, NT and ST practices. Crop WUE for root yield or sucrose yield under each tillage system and year were estimated by dividing root yield and sucrose yield by the amount of water used by the crop through the process of evapotranspiration (ET). No significant differences due to tillage treatment were found for WU, sugarbeet root yield, sucrose yield, and WUE for root yield, and WUE for sucrose yield in 2018, 2019, and 2020 growing seasons. On average, total amounts of water required to produce one Megagram (Mg) of sugarbeet root were 60.6 m3 for CT, 65.7 m3 for NT and 61.3 m3 for ST. The amount of water used to produce a given quantity of roots under NT was slightly greater than both CT and ST. Maximizing crop WUE is possible with innovative, and smart technologies along with appropriate land and irrigation management practices. While NT and ST offer economic and environmental advantages over CT for agricultural production, more studies are needed under various soils, environments, and farming practices prior to making any recommendation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信