健康科学教育中人工智能生成的多项选择题:利益相关者观点和实施考虑

IF 1.7 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Matthew Reid , Michelle French , Stavroula Andreopoulos , Christine Wong , Nohjin Kee
{"title":"健康科学教育中人工智能生成的多项选择题:利益相关者观点和实施考虑","authors":"Matthew Reid ,&nbsp;Michelle French ,&nbsp;Stavroula Andreopoulos ,&nbsp;Christine Wong ,&nbsp;Nohjin Kee","doi":"10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in health science education because they are an efficient way to evaluate knowledge from simple recall to complex clinical reasoning. The creation of high-quality MCQs, however, can be time-consuming and requires expertise in question composition. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs), offer the potential to allow for the rapid generation of high-quality, consistent, and course-specific MCQs. Here we discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of the use of this technology in the generation of MCQs, including ensuring the accuracy and fairness of questions, along with technical, ethical, and privacy considerations. We offer practical guiding principles for the implementation of AI-generated MCQs and outline future research areas related to their impact on student learning and educational quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72753,"journal":{"name":"Current research in physiology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-generated multiple-choice questions in health science education: Stakeholder perspectives and implementation considerations\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Reid ,&nbsp;Michelle French ,&nbsp;Stavroula Andreopoulos ,&nbsp;Christine Wong ,&nbsp;Nohjin Kee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in health science education because they are an efficient way to evaluate knowledge from simple recall to complex clinical reasoning. The creation of high-quality MCQs, however, can be time-consuming and requires expertise in question composition. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs), offer the potential to allow for the rapid generation of high-quality, consistent, and course-specific MCQs. Here we discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of the use of this technology in the generation of MCQs, including ensuring the accuracy and fairness of questions, along with technical, ethical, and privacy considerations. We offer practical guiding principles for the implementation of AI-generated MCQs and outline future research areas related to their impact on student learning and educational quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in physiology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944125000227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944125000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多项选择题在健康科学教育中被广泛应用,因为它是一种有效的评估知识的方式,从简单的回忆到复杂的临床推理。然而,创建高质量的mcq可能很耗时,并且需要在问题组成方面的专业知识。人工智能(AI)的进步,尤其是大型语言模型(llm),为快速生成高质量、一致的、特定课程的mcq提供了潜力。在这里,我们将讨论在生成mcq时使用该技术的潜在优点和缺点,包括确保问题的准确性和公平性,以及技术、道德和隐私方面的考虑。我们为人工智能生成的mcq的实施提供了实用的指导原则,并概述了与人工智能对学生学习和教育质量的影响相关的未来研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-generated multiple-choice questions in health science education: Stakeholder perspectives and implementation considerations
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in health science education because they are an efficient way to evaluate knowledge from simple recall to complex clinical reasoning. The creation of high-quality MCQs, however, can be time-consuming and requires expertise in question composition. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs), offer the potential to allow for the rapid generation of high-quality, consistent, and course-specific MCQs. Here we discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of the use of this technology in the generation of MCQs, including ensuring the accuracy and fairness of questions, along with technical, ethical, and privacy considerations. We offer practical guiding principles for the implementation of AI-generated MCQs and outline future research areas related to their impact on student learning and educational quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信