UVC光对室内空气化学影响的模拟研究

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Toby J. Carter, David R. Shaw, Ewan Eadie, Jose L. Jimenez, Paula J. Olsiewski, Zhe Peng, Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*, 
{"title":"UVC光对室内空气化学影响的模拟研究","authors":"Toby J. Carter,&nbsp;David R. Shaw,&nbsp;Ewan Eadie,&nbsp;Jose L. Jimenez,&nbsp;Paula J. Olsiewski,&nbsp;Zhe Peng,&nbsp;Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h<sup>–1</sup> for an air change rate of 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup>, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h<sup>–1</sup> at 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup> in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.</p><p >GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 31","pages":"16543–16555"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of UVC Light on Indoor Air Chemistry: A Modeling Study\",\"authors\":\"Toby J. Carter,&nbsp;David R. Shaw,&nbsp;Ewan Eadie,&nbsp;Jose L. Jimenez,&nbsp;Paula J. Olsiewski,&nbsp;Zhe Peng,&nbsp;Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h<sup>–1</sup> for an air change rate of 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup>, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h<sup>–1</sup> at 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup> in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.</p><p >GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 31\",\"pages\":\"16543–16555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杀菌紫外线(GUV)在空气消毒方面越来越受到关注,特别是在COVID-19大流行之后。GUV空气净化装置使用222或254 nm光去除室内环境中的空气和表面病原体,尽管它们对室内化学的影响受到的关注有限。本模型研究探讨了GUV光对室内空气污染物浓度的影响。在一个模拟教室中,使用222 nm的灯,房间平均辐照度为1 μW cm-2,预测臭氧产出率为0.33 mg h-1,空气变化率为0.5 h-1,导致与居住者和无生命表面相互作用,形成二次产物,包括壬醛,癸醛和4-氧戊二醛。相比之下,在254 nm、室内平均辐照度为15 μW cm-2的灯照射下,臭氧浓度在0.5 h-1下增加了0.19 mg h-1,主要是由于渗透作用。GUV光消毒的长期健康效益需要与GUV引起的污染造成的健康危害进行定量比较,以便更全面地评估该技术的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of UVC Light on Indoor Air Chemistry: A Modeling Study

Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm–2, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h–1 for an air change rate of 0.5 h–1, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h–1 at 0.5 h–1 in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm–2, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.

GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信