Toby J. Carter, David R. Shaw, Ewan Eadie, Jose L. Jimenez, Paula J. Olsiewski, Zhe Peng, Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*,
{"title":"UVC光对室内空气化学影响的模拟研究","authors":"Toby J. Carter, David R. Shaw, Ewan Eadie, Jose L. Jimenez, Paula J. Olsiewski, Zhe Peng, Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h<sup>–1</sup> for an air change rate of 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup>, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h<sup>–1</sup> at 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup> in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.</p><p >GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 31","pages":"16543–16555"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of UVC Light on Indoor Air Chemistry: A Modeling Study\",\"authors\":\"Toby J. Carter, David R. Shaw, Ewan Eadie, Jose L. Jimenez, Paula J. Olsiewski, Zhe Peng, Charles J. Weschler and Nicola Carslaw*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h<sup>–1</sup> for an air change rate of 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup>, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h<sup>–1</sup> at 0.5 h<sup>–1</sup> in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm<sup>–2</sup>, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.</p><p >GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 31\",\"pages\":\"16543–16555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c07414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of UVC Light on Indoor Air Chemistry: A Modeling Study
Germicidal ultraviolet light (GUV) is gaining attention for air disinfection, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. GUV air cleaning devices use 222 or 254 nm light to remove airborne and surface pathogens from indoor environments, although their impact on indoor chemistry has received limited attention. This modeling study investigates the impact of GUV light on indoor air pollutant concentrations. In a simulated, occupied classroom using a 222 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 1 μW cm–2, the predicted ozone production rate was 0.33 mg h–1 for an air change rate of 0.5 h–1, leading to surface interactions with occupants and inanimate surfaces that formed secondary products including nonanal, decanal, and 4-oxopentanal. By contrast, ozone concentration increased by 0.19 mg h–1 at 0.5 h–1 in the presence of a 254 nm lamp with an average room irradiance of 15 μW cm–2, primarily due to infiltration. The long-term health benefits of GUV light disinfection need to be quantitatively compared to the health harms due to GUV-induced pollution to allow a more complete assessment of the benefits of this technology.
GUV air-cleaning devices have excellent efficacy in the removal of some airborne and surface pathogens; however, the consequent indoor chemistry is relatively underexplored. This study reports the production of ozone and secondary oxidation products indoors during the use of GUV devices.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.